Skip to main content
Log in

An ethical perspective on caregiving in the family

  • Published:
The Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The emphasis on intra-family caregiving that prevailed from ancient until relatively recent times, in both philosophy and practice, was substantially displaced under the influence of the Eighteenth Century Enlightenment by an emphasis on individual independence. The ethics of familial relationships ceased to be at the center of philosophical interest. A consequence was growing inattention to the social conditions and practical arrangements needed to support family efforts to take care of the very young, the very old, the physically or mentally ill or disabled, and others in need of care. The myth of the self-sufficient family must be exploded to permit the development of a public policy that will make such support possible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference notes

  1. Hauerwas, Stanley.Truthfulness and Tragedy Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. 1977, p. 172.

    Google Scholar 

  2. From Roger Wertheimer, “Philosophy on Humanity,” as cited by Hauerwas, p. 277.

  3. Alasdair MacIntyre.After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre-Dame Press, 1981, p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ibid., p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ibid., p. 177.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Christina Hoff Sommers, “Filial Morality,”Journal of Philosophy, vol. LXXXIII/8, August, 1986, p. 443.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid., p. 443.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ibid., p. 445.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Adam Ferguson,Principles of Moral and Political Science, In Louis Schneider, ed.,The Scottish Moralists: On Human Nature and Society Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967, p. 82.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ibid., p. 82.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibid., p. 85.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ibid., p. 82.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cicero,De Officibus, as cited by C.S. Lewis,The Abolition of Man. New York: Macmillan, 1947, p. 102.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ibid., p. 107.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thomas Aquinas.The Summa Theologica. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc., 1950, II–II, Q. 32, Art. 9, p. 549.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Augustine.The City of God, trans. Marcus Dods New York: Modern Library, 1950, Bk. XIX, Ch. 14, p. 693.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Butler, Bishop. “Fifteen Sermons.” InThe British Moralists: 1650–1800, ed. D.D. Raphael Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1969, vol. 1, p. 374.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Henry Sidgwick.The Methods of Ethics. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1981, p. 242.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ibid., p. 259.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ibid., pp. 259–260.

    Google Scholar 

  21. English, Jane. “What Do Grown Children Owe Their Parents?” InHaving Children: Philosophical and Legal Reflections on Parenthood, Onora O'Neill and William Ruddick (eds.) New York, Oxford University Press, 1979, p. 351.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Slote, Michael A. “Obedience and Illusions.” InHaving Children: Philosophical and Legal Reflections on Parenthood, p. 319.

  23. Ibid., p. 321.

  24. Lewis, C.S.The Abolition of Man. New York: Macmillan, 1947, p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ibid., p. 104.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sidgwick, op. cit., p. 260.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nisbet, Robert A.,Community and Power. New York: Oxford University Press, 1962, p. 60.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Skolnick, Jerome H. & Arlene,Family in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1980, p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Haring, Bernard.The Law of Christ. Trans. E.G. Kaiser Westminster Maryland: The Newman Press, 1966, pp. 3 & 112.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Post, S. An ethical perspective on caregiving in the family. J Med Hum 9, 6–16 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01115239

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01115239

Keywords

Navigation