Skip to main content
Log in

Physical dimensions and covariance

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The nonadditive properties of mass make it desirable to abandon mass as a basis unit in physics and to replace it by a unit of the dimension of the quantum of action [h]. The ensuing four-unit system of action, charge, length, and time [h, q, l, t] interacts in a much more elucidating fashion with experiment and with the fundamental structure of physics. All space-time differential forms expressing fundamental laws of physics are forms of physical dimensions, h, h/q, or q. Their occurrence as periods (residues) of period integrals of forms makes h and q topological invariants in space-time and stresses in general the global nature of quantization. The coordinate dimensions [l] and [t] only come into play for the form-coefficients, the metric tensor, and their tensorial relatives. One thus obtains a very natural guidance for implementing the principle of general covariance, when coordinate-based descriptions are necessary. The consequences for the general theory of relativity are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. Kretschmann,Ann. Phys. 53, 575 (1917).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Einstein,Ann. Phys. 55, 241 (1918).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A general exposition of Bridgman's views on the principle of general covariance can be found on pp. 80–83 of P. W. Bridgman,The Nature of Physical Theory (Princeton University Press, 1936); also in Dover reprint, New York. There are several parenthetical references to the subject in Bridgman's other writings; see, for instance, the comparison between observability in quantum mechanics and covariance in relativity on p. 109 of P. W. Bridgman,Reflections of a Physicist (Philosophical Library, New York, 1949).

  4. C. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler,Gravitation (Freeman, San Francisco, 1973); also W. T. Ni and M. Zimmerman,Phys. Rev. D. 17, 1473 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Hilbert,Göttingen Nachrichten, p. 395 (1915) and p. 477 (1917).

  6. F. Klein,Göttingen Nachrichten, p. 469 (1917) and p. 481 (1917).

  7. E. Noether,Göttingen Nachrichten, p. 235 (1918); for a discussion of Hilbert's statement see Section 6, p. 253.

  8. E. J. Post,Phys. Lett. A 79, 288 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. B. Dorgelo and J. A. Schouten,Amsterdam Ac. 48, 124, 282, 393 (1946).

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Cartan,Ann. l'Ecole Norm. Sup. 41, 1 (1924).

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. J. Post,Phys. Rev. D, forthcoming.

  12. The following three classics deal, in the given order, with the algebraic, the local-analytic, and the global-analytic aspects of the mathematical theory of covariance: M. Bôcher,Higher Algebra (Macmillan, New York, 1912), J. A. Schouten,Ricci Calculus, 2nd edn. (Springer, Berlin, 1954). G. de Rham,Variétés Differentiables, 2nd edn. (Hermann, Paris, 1960).

  13. J. A. Schouten,Tensor Analysis for Physicists (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1951), Ch. V.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. L. Ericksen,Handbuch der Physik, III/I (Springer, Berlin, 1960), see pp. 797–805.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. A. Toupin, Centro Internationale Matematico Estivo (summer School 1965), p. 266 and following.

  16. E. J. Post,Formal Structure of Electromagnetics (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Except Refs. 13–16, no recent texts have been found with discussions of the Dorgelo-Schouten distinction between absolute and relative dimensions (Ref. 9). For comparison consult recent treatments: R. C. Parkhurst,Dimensional Analysis and Scale Factors (The Institute of Physics and The Physical Society, London 1964); E. S. Taylor,Dimensional Analysis for Engineers (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1974); E. De St. Q. Isaacson and M. de St. Q. Isaacson,Dimensional Analysis in Engineering and Physics (Wiley, New York, 1975). Prior to the D.S. distinction there is, of course, the classic P. W. Bridgman,Dimensional Analysis (Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, 1931).

  18. A. K. Schultz, Thesis, University of Houston (1979).

  19. A. K. Schultz et al.,Phys. Lett. A 74, 384 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Post, E.J. Physical dimensions and covariance. Found Phys 12, 169–195 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00736847

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00736847

Keywords

Navigation