Abstract
A view of evolution is presented in this paper (a two paper series), intended as a methodological infrastructure for modeling spatio-cultural systems (the design outline of such a model is presented in paper II). A motivation for the re-articulation of evolution as information dynamics is the phenomenologically discovered prerequisite of embedding a meaning-attributing apparatus in any and all models of spatio-cultural systems. An evolution is construed as the dynamics of a complex system comprised of memory devices, connected in an ordered fashion (not randomly) by information-exchanges. An information-exchange transpires when the recipient system adopts a strategy (a continuum of events) that eventually changes its structure; namely, after the exchange, it contains and conveys different information. These memory devices—sub-systems—are also similarly constructed complex system. Only a part of the information is retained by a system in its physical-memory storage, which eventually loses this function too, when the ability to retrieve a common enough structure is lost. The entire amount of information is a system’s structure of connections (information exchanges); it is contained (apparently stored) dynamically when a system is observed in a temporarily stable state. This temporary permanence—robustness and resilience—is attained dynamically; namely, enabled by changes taking place in its sub-systems and in each of their sub-systems. Therefore, for modeling such a system a multi-layer/multi-scale approach is preferable. It enables the addition and subtraction of an interim scale and the consideration of such a scale as a micro or a macro (thus initiating a maneuver up or down scale) according to an ad-hoc requirement of the model, which imitates an envisaged sub system (called an ‘Inner World’), to which a certain range of decisions is relegated. This dynamics is driven (in time) by dynamically originated information growth, as defined by Shannon; i.e. by the fact that each of certain state transitions have occurred sometime in the past of the system just so and not otherwise, and by the fact that they have occurred in a certain order. Therefore, each ‘history’ and memory retrieval availability of information is unique, and thus can be used to differentiate meanings. Hence, there cannot be a comprehensive solution to the meaning attribution model-design challenge. However, the observation that at the core of each envisaged complex system, moving in time according to a rounded logic, there is an information manipulating device, operating necessarily according to a Boolean logic, can be copied into the design of a model. This observation enables, therefore, the embedding of a specific, locally fitted, meaning attributing device, which is an information manipulating mechanism (it splices/attaches one segment of information to another—its meaning). However, this is just a framework; the actual solution has still to be found locally—for each subject system. Such a solution is demonstrated for the change in location or layout in the Israeli city in paper II.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CS:
-
Complex system/s
- EP:
-
Evolutionary path
- MM:
-
Mental map/s
- POV:
-
Point of view
- ITh:
-
Information-theory
- IW:
-
Inner world
- RA:
-
Reactive animation
- TA:
-
Tel Aviv
- VF:
-
Visual formalism
- SMV:
-
Space modeling vector
References
Alon U. (2007) An introduction to systems biology: Design principles of biological circuits. Chapman & Hall, CRC, London
Anderson P. W. (1972) More is different. Science 177: 393–396
Atlan H., Cohen R. I. (1998) Immune information, self-organization and meaning. International Immunology 10(6): 711–717
Axelrod R. (1997) The complexity of cooperation: Agent based models of competition and cooperation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Barbábasi A. L. (2003) Linked. PLUME, NY
Batty, M. (2008). Scaling, Interactions, Networks, Dynamics and Urban Morphologies. In The encyclopedia of complexity & system science. Berlin: Springer, DE. www.casa.ucl.ac.uk.
Ben Jacob, E., & Shapira, Y. (2010). Meaning-based natural intelligence vs. information-based. Artificial Intelligence (in press). http://star.tau.ac.il/~eshel/papers/meaning/20based.pdf.
Benguigui, L. (1999). Computer simulation. In Urban Geography, D. Stauffer (Ed.) Annual review of computational physics (Vol. VII, pp. 125–149).
Bohm D. (1992) Thought as a system. Routledge, London
Bohm D. (1996) On dialogue. Routledge, London
Brand S. (1997) How buildings learn: What happens to them after they’re built (revised edition). Phoenix Illustrated, London
Cohen R. I. (2004) Tending Adam’s garden: Evolving cognitive immune self. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Cohen R. I. et al (2006) Immune system computation and the immunological homunculus. In: Nierstrasz O. (Ed.) MoDELS 2006, LNCS 4199. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 499–512
Cohen R., Erez K., Ben-Avraham D., Havlin S. (2000) Resilience of the internet to random breakdowns. Physical Review Letters 85: 4626
Dendrinos D. S., Sonis M. (1990) Chaos and socio-spatial dynamics. Applied mathematical sciences no. 86. Springer, NY
Diamond J. (2005) Collapse: How societies choose to fail or succeed. Viking, New York
Efroni S., Harel D., Cohen I. R. (2007) Emergent dynamics of thymocyte development and lineage determination. PLoS Computational Biology 3(1): e13. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030013
Even-Zohar, I. (2005). Papers in culture research. www.tau.ac.il/~itamarez/works/books/ez-cr2004.pdf.
Gros C. (2008) Complex and adaptive dynamcial systems, chapter 7: Elements of cognitive system theory. Springer, Berlin
Hacking, I. (1987). Was there a scientific revolution 1800–1930?. In L. Krüger, L. Daston, & M. Heidelberger (Eds.), The probabilistic revolution (Vol. 1, pp. 45–58). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Hägerstrand T. (1967) Innovation diffusion as a spatial process. Chicago University Press, Chicago
Haken, H. (1999). Synergetic cities. Part IV self organization and the city. of J. Portugali et al. Berlin: Springer.
Hanson J. (1998) Decoding homes and houses. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Harel D. (1987) Statecharts: A visual formalism for complex systems. Science of Computer Programming 8: 231–274
Harel, D., & Gery, E. (1997). Executable object modeling with statecharts. Computer, 30(7), IEEE Press, pp. 31–42.
Hillier B. (1996) Space is the machine: A configurational theory of architecture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Holland J. H. (1995) Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity. Perseus, Cambridge, MA
Holland J. H. (1998) Emergence: From chaos to order. Perseus, Cambridge, MA
Jablonka E., Lamb J. (2004) Evolution in four dimensions: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral and symbolic variation in the history of life. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Kauffman S. (1995) At home in the universe: The search for the laws of self-organization and complexity. Oxford University Press, NY
Keller E. F. (2000) Models of, models for. Philosophy of Science 67(suppl): 72–86
Keller E. F. (2005) Revisiting “scale-free” networks. BioEssays Wiley Periodicals, Inc 27: 1060–1068
Kostof S. (1991) The city shaped: Urban patterns and meanings through history. Thames & Hudson, London
Kostof S. (1992) The city assembled: The elements of urban form through history. Thames & Hudson, London
Kuhn S. T. (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Lakoff G. (1987) Women fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. The University of Chicago Pres, Chicago
Lane, D. (2008). Artifacts and organization: A complexity perspective on innovation and social change. http://videolectures.net/eccs08/_lane/_aaoacpoi/.
Levin S. A. (2002) Complex adaptive systems: Exploring the known, the unknown and the unknowable. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 40(1): 3–19
Louzoun Y., Atlan H. (2006) The emergence of goals in a self-organizing network: A non-mentalist model of intentional actions. Neural Networks Elsevier 20: 156–171
Louzoun Y., Solomon S., Atlan H., Cohen R. (2003) Proliferation and competition in discrete biological systems. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology Elsevier 65: 375–396
Manson, S. M. (2000). Simplifying complexity: A review of complexity theory. Geoforum, 32(2001), 305–414, Pergamon.
Neuman Y., Orion I. (2006) Why are three-dimensional organisms composed of two-dimensional layers?. Foundations of Science Springer 12: 1–7
Posner Z. (2001) The past and the present of perfect future organization of urban space in American cities. Bar Ilan University/Geography, Ramat Gan
Pumain, D., Paulus, F., Vacchiani-Marcuzzo, C., & Lobo, J. (2006). An evolutionary theory for interpreting urban scaling laws. Cybergeo: Revue européenne de géographie. No 343 http://cybergeo.revues.org/index343.html.
Rabinovich, M. I., Varona, P., Selverston, A.I., & Abarbanel, H. D. I. (2006). Dynamical principles in neuroscience reviews of modern physics, 78, october–december 2006, The American Physical Society, pp. 1213–1264.
Schweber S., Wächter M. (2000) Complex systems, modelling and simulation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 31(4): 583–609
Shanon C. E., Weaver W. (1963) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Chicago
Simon H. A. (1997) Administrative behavior (4th ed.). The Free Press, NY
Sonis M., Hewing G. J. D. (2009) Tool kits in regional science: Theory, models and estimation. Springer, Dodrecht
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small world’ Networks. Nature, 393.
Watts D. J. (2003) Six degrees: The science of a connected age. W.W. Norton & Company, NY, London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Posner, Z. Spatio-Cultural Evolution as Information Dynamics: Part I. Found Sci 17, 125–162 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-011-9230-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-011-9230-2