Abstract
Smith proposes an account of how languages developed. He did so not as historian, but as a philosopher with a special concern about how a nominalist could account for general terms. Names for individuals are taken as fairly unproblematic – say ‘Thames’ and ‘Avon’ for each of the respective rivers. But whence the word ‘river,’ applicable to more than one, if all that exist are particular objects? Smith’s view is not the usual one, according to which people deploy a powerful ability to abstract mentally, and subsequently affix a label to a general concept. He resisted this because he granted that such robust mental processes themselves presuppose the use of words. Rather, what holds the class together is the word itself, a “single appellation.”
Text excerpted from: Bryce, J.C. ed. 1983. Adam Smith: Lectures on Rhetoric and Belle Lettres. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Origine de l’Inégalité, Partie Premiere, p. 376, 377. Edition d’Amsterdam des Oeuvres diverses de J. J. Rousseau. [The reference is to Discourse on the Origin and Foundation of Inequality among Humans by Jean Jaques Rousseau (1755), Pt.1, Sect. 23–31.]
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Powell, L. (2017). Adam Smith. In: Cameron, M., Hill, B., Stainton, R. (eds) Sourcebook in the History of Philosophy of Language. Springer Graduate Texts in Philosophy, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26908-5_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26908-5_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26906-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26908-5
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)