Abstract
Pigeons received baseline training on an equal-valued multiple unsignaled variable-interval/signaled variable-interval schedule. This procedure resulted in high and low response rates during the unsignaled and signaled components, respectively. Behavior during each component was then separately extinguished. Extinction of the unsignaled component resulted in positive contrast in the signaled variable-interval component. When reinforcement was withheld during the signaled component, marked increases in responding during this component occurred, and responding in the presence of the signal was very resistant to extinction. Accompanying the breakdown of the discrimination during the signaled component was an increase in the rate of responding in the unsignaled variable-interval component (i.e., positive induction). The implications of these results for several theories of behavioral contrast are considered.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brownstein, A. J., & Hughes, R. G. The role of response sup-pression in behavior contrast: Signaled reinforcement. Psychonomic Science, 1970,18, 50–52.
Brownstein, A. J., & Newsom, C. Behavioral contrast in multiple schedules with equal reinforcement rates. Psychonomic Science, 1970,18,25–26.
Gamzu, E., & Schwartz, B. The maintenance of key pecking by stimulus contingent and response-independent food presentations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1973, 19, 65–72.
Pear, J. J., & Wilkie, D. M. Contrast and induction in rats on multiple schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1971,15,289–296.
Powell, R. W. Some effects of punishment shock intensity upon discriminative responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1971,15, 109–116.
Powell, R. W. Effects of stimulus control and deprivation upon discriminative responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1973, 19, 351–360.
Powell, R. W., & Palm, L. Further evidence of interaction between deprivation effects and stimulus control of responding: III. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 1977, 9, 307–310.
Rachlin, H. Contrast and matching. Psychological Review, 1973, 80, 217–234.
Reynolds, G. S. Behavioral contrast. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1961, 4, 57–71.
Terrace, H. S. Stimulus control. In W K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts 1966.
Terrace, H. S. Discrimination learning, the peak shift, and behavioral contrast. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of behavior, 1968,11,727–741.
Weisman, R. G. Some determinants of inhibitory stimulus control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1969, 12, 443–450.
Weisman, R. G. Factors influencing inhibitory stimulus control: Differential reinforcement of other behavior during discrimination training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1970,14,87–91.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Powell, R.W., Palm, L.J. Interaction effects in a multiple schedule of signaled and unsignaled reinforcement. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 16, 11–14 (1980). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03337080
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03337080