Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Discussion The Importance of Continuity: A Reply to Chris Eliasmith

  • Published:
Minds and Machines Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The notion of continuity of dynamic representations serves as a beacon for an integrative neuroscience to emerge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Eliasmith, C. (2001), ‘Attractive and In-Discrete: A Critique of Two Putative Virtues of the Dynamicist Theory of Mind',’ Minds and Machines 11, pp. 417-426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, W.J. (2000), ‘Brain Dynamics: Brain Chaos and Intentionality',’ in E. Gordon, ed., Integrative Neuroscience, Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory for Dynamics of Emergent Intelligence, Brain Science Institute, RIKEN, Saitama, 351-0198, Japan

    Roman R. Poznanski

Authors
  1. Roman R. Poznanski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Poznanski, R.R. Discussion The Importance of Continuity: A Reply to Chris Eliasmith. Minds and Machines 12, 435 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016127125203

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016127125203

Keywords

Search

Navigation