Europe PMC
Do data resources managed by EMBL-EBI and our collaborators make a difference to your work?
If so, please take 10 minutes to fill in our survey, and help us make the case for why sustaining open data resources is critical for life sciences research.

This website requires cookies, and the limited processing of your personal data in order to function. By using the site you are agreeing to this as outlined in our privacy notice and cookie policy.

Abstract 


This article analyses the viewpoints of doctors, patients and the state of the phenomenon of unconventional methods of treatment/alternative medicine in Slovenia. The doctors' view-points are taken from the official documents of the Medical Chamber of Slovenia and the Slovene Medical Association. The patients' viewpoints are established on the basis of public opinion and epidemiological research, carried out in 1994 and 1996 on two representative samples of the Slovene population from the Celje area. The estimation of the attitude of the state is based on legislation and other regulations connected with alternative medicine. The findings of our analysis show a strongly negative attitude of doctors to any form of alternative medicine. In contrast, as many as half the patients express a favourable opinion on alternative methods of treatment, and more than a third of them actually make use of them. From existing laws it is evident that the state in general does not deal with alternative medicine, except for possibilities in such cases when a doctor or some other healthcare professional uses alternative (non-verified) methods of treatment. Alternative medicine is, from the point of view of social medicine, a phenomenon that should be followed, analysed and controlled. Dangerous as well as protective factors which accompany the execution of alternative methods should be recognised so as to be able to inform the public of the results in a timely and accurate manner. Because of the need for the legal and healthcare security of Slovene citizens, the state should regulate existing unconventional treatments.

References 


Articles referenced by this article (22)

  • Zdravniska zbornica Slovenije. Kodeks medicinske deontologije Slovenije. Zbornicni akti—ponatis. 2. November 1995.

  • Angelski, R., Godec, M., Lokar and Rozman, B. (1989). Sklepi 9. redne skupscine ZZD—Slovenskega zdravniskega drustva in 126. rednega letnega srecanja slovenskih zdravnikov.Zdrav. Vestn. 58, 209–9.

  • Rozman, P. (1993) Nekonvencionalne medicinske metode. Polozaj in perspektive.Zdrav. Vestn. 62, 479–485.

  • Godec, M. (1989). Akupunktura.Zdrav. Vestn. 58, 131–133.

  • Anon. (1982). Enotni seznam zdravstvenih storitev. Zavod SR Slovenije za zdravstveno varstvo Ljubljana.

  • Pope-Toth, K. (1994).Homeopatija, Ljubljana, Mladinska knjiga.

  • Debevc, M. (1996). Alternativno zdravljenje raka: zdravljenje ali ‘zdravljenje’?ISIS 5, 28–30.

  • Tos, N. (1994) Slovensko javno mnenje—Stalisce Slovencev o zdravju in zdravstvu.

  • Frankic, D. (1996). Vrednotenje pravilne uporabe zdravil v konceptu kvalitete zlvljenja: doktorska disertacija, Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za Farmacijo Ljubljana, 82–85.

  • Rajtmajer, M. (1997). Odnos bolnikov zdravstvenega doma Celje do uporabe in ucinkovitosti alternativnih metod zdravljenja.Zdrav. Var. 36, 255–265.

Show 10 more references (10 of 22)

Citations & impact 


Impact metrics

Jump to Citations

Article citations