Skip to main content
Log in

Debating point

Alternative medicine in Slovenia: Some social-medical views

  • Feature
  • Published:
Health Care Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This article analyses the viewpoints of doctors, patients and the state of the phenomenon of unconventional methods of treatment/alternative medicine in Slovenia. The doctors’ viewpoints are taken from the official documents of the Medical Chamber of Slovenia and the Slovene Medical Association. The patients’ viewpoints are established on the basis of public opinion and epidemiological research, carried out in 1994 and 1996 on two representative samples of the Slovene population from the Celje area. The estimation of the attitude of the state is based on legislation and other regulations connected with alternative medicine. The findings of our analysis show a strongly negative attitude of doctors to any form of alternative medicine. In contrast, as many as half the patients express a favourable opinion on alternative methods of treatment, and more than a third of them actually make use of them. From existing laws it is evident that the state in general does not deal with alternative medicine, except for possibilities in such cases when a doctor or some other healthcare professional uses alternative (non-verified) methods of treatment. Alternative medicine is, from the point of view of social medicine, a phenomenon that should be followed, analysed and controlled. Dangerous as well as protective factors which accompany the exceution of alternative methods should be recognised so as to be able to inform the public of the results in a timely and accurate manner. Because of the need for the legal and healthcare security of Slovene citizens, the state should regulate existing unconventional treatments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zdravniska zbornica Slovenije. Kodeks medicinske deontologije Slovenije. Zbornicni akti—ponatis. 2. November 1995.

  2. Angelski, R., Godec, M., Lokar and Rozman, B. (1989). Sklepi 9. redne skupscine ZZD—Slovenskega zdravniskega drustva in 126. rednega letnega srecanja slovenskih zdravnikov.Zdrav. Vestn. 58, 209–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rozman, P. (1993) Nekonvencionalne medicinske metode. Polozaj in perspektive.Zdrav. Vestn. 62, 479–485.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Godec, M. (1989). Akupunktura.Zdrav. Vestn. 58, 131–133.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Anon. (1982). Enotni seznam zdravstvenih storitev. Zavod SR Slovenije za zdravstveno varstvo Ljubljana.

  6. Pope-Toth, K. (1994).Homeopatija, Ljubljana, Mladinska knjiga.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Debevc, M. (1996). Alternativno zdravljenje raka: zdravljenje ali ‘zdravljenje’?ISIS 5, 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tos, N. (1994) Slovensko javno mnenje—Stalisce Slovencev o zdravju in zdravstvu.

  9. Frankic, D. (1996). Vrednotenje pravilne uporabe zdravil v konceptu kvalitete zlvljenja: doktorska disertacija, Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za Farmacijo Ljubljana, 82–85.

  10. Rajtmajer, M. (1997). Odnos bolnikov zdravstvenega doma Celje do uporabe in ucinkovitosti alternativnih metod zdravljenja.Zdrav. Var. 36, 255–265.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zakon o zdravstveni dejavnosti. Uradni list 9/92.

  12. Ŝetinc, M. (1996). Poslanska pobuba. Drzavni zbor Republike Slovenije. Ljubljana, 24 June 1996.

  13. Dubos, R. (1960).Mirage of Health, Allen&Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cochran, A.L. (1972).Effectiveness and Efficiency, Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust, London.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Navaro, V. (1976).Medicine Under Capitalism, Prodist, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Illich, I. (1976).Limits to Medicine, Calder&Boyars, London.

    Google Scholar 

  17. McKeown, T. (1988).The Origins of Human Disease, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Premik, M. (1994). Promocija zdravja. Zbornik predavanj ‘Rantovi dnevi’. Ljubljana: Slovensko ortodontsko drustvo, 1–6.

  19. Selic, P. (1994). Biopsihosocialni model zdravja.Anthropos 4(6), 150–169.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Polic, M. (1993). Dejavniki ohranjanja in spreminjanja (ne)zdravih zivljenskih navad.Adrav. Var. 32, 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Freidson, E. (1970).The Profession of Medicine, Dodd, Mead & Co. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  22. WHO (1996).Traditional Medicine, Fact Sheet No. 134, September, 1–2.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Premik, M. Debating point. Health Care Anal 6, 59–64 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02678083

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02678083

Keywords

Navigation