Abstract
When discussing the distinction between referential and attributive uses of definite descriptions, Keith Donnellan also mentions cases such as ‘Smith’s murderer is insane’, uttered in a scenario in which Smith committed suicide. In this essay, I defend a two-fold thesis: (i) the alleged intuition that utterances of ‘Smith’s murderer is insane’ are true in the scenario in question is independent from the phenomenon of referential uses of definite description, and, most importantly, (ii) even if such intuition is granted semantic relevance, the evidence it presents is compatible with a Russellian treatment of definite descriptions. I thus present a Russellian analysis of ‘Smith’s murderer is insane’ which, when coupled with certain independently plausible hypotheses, explains the presumed intuition that certain utterances of this sentence are indeed true, at least as long as the intended individual is insane.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barwise, J. and Perry, J. 1983: Situations and Attitudes, Cambridge, Ma.: The MIT Press.
Bertolet, R. 1984: ‘On a Fictional Ellipsis’, Erkenntnis 21, 189–194.
Bonomi, A. 1998: ‘Indices and contexts of discourse’, Lingua e Stile 33, 471–485.
Donnellan, K. 1966: ‘Reference and definite descriptions’, Philosophical Review 75, 281–304. Reprinted in A. P. Martinich (ed.): The Philosophy of Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985: 236–248.
Donnellan, K. 1968: ‘Putting Humpty Dumpty back together again’, Philosophical Review 77, 203–215.
Enç, M. 1986: ‘Towards a referential analysis of temporal expressions’, Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 405–426.
Kaplan, D. 1977: ‘Demonstratives’, In J. Almog, J. Perry, and H. Wettstein (eds.): Themes from Kaplan, New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.
Kripke, S. 1977: ‘Speaker’s reference and semantic reference’, In P. A. French, T. E. Uehling, and H. K. Wettstein (eds.): Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 6–27. Reprinted in A. P. Martinich (ed.): The Philosophy of Language, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985, 249–268.
Lamarque, P. 1987: ‘The Puzzle of the Flash Stockman: A Reply to David Lewis’, Analysis 47, 93–5.
Neale, S. 1990: Descriptions, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Phillips, J. 2000: ‘Two Theories of Fictional Discourse’, American Philosophical Quarterly 37, 107–118.
Predelli, S. 1997: ‘Talk About Fiction’, Erkenntnis 46: 69–77.
Recanati, F. 1996: ‘Domains of discourse’, Linguistics and Philosophy 19, 445–475.
Recanati, F. 2000: Oratio Obliqua, Oratio Recta: An Essay on Metarepresentation, Cambridge, Ma.: The MIT Press.
Reimer, M. 1998: ‘Quantification and context’, Linguistics and Philosophy 21, 95–115.
Richard, M. 1981: ‘Temporalism and Eternalism’, Philosophical Studies 39, 1–13.
Richard, M. 1982: ‘Tense, Propositions, and Meanings’, Philosophical Studies 41, 337–351.
Russell, B. 1905: ‘On Denoting’, Mind 14, 479–493.
Salmon, N. 1982: ‘Assertion and incomplete definite descriptions’, Philosophical Studies 42, 37–45.
Salmon, N. 1991: ‘The pragmatic fallacy’, Philosophical Studies 63, 83–97.
Strawson, P. F. 1956: ‘On referring’, In A. Flew (ed.): Essays in Conceptual Analysis, London: McMillan and Co., Ltd.
Wettstein, H. 1981: ‘Demonstrative reference and definite descriptions’, Philosophical Studies 40, 241–257.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Predelli, S. Russellian description and Smith’s suicide. Acta Anal 18, 125–141 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-003-1017-9
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-003-1017-9