Skip to main content
Log in

Response to "ordinary reasonable care is not the minimum for engineers" (M. Davis)

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Harris, C. E., Pritchard, M.S. and Rabins, M.J. (2000) Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases. Wadsworth, Belmont, California.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davis, M. (2001) Comment on the Case Study “Doing the Minimum”: Ordinary Reasonable Care is Not the Minimum for Engineers, Science and Engineering Ethics: 7(2): 286–290.

    Google Scholar 

  3. May, W.F. (1988) Professional Virtue and Self-Regulation, in: Joan Callahan, (ed.) Ethical Issues in Professional Life Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, p. 408.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hume, D. (1777) Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, 3rd ed., with text revised and notes by P.H. Nidditch (Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK), reprinted from the 1777 edition.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael S. Pritchard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pritchard, M.S. Response to "ordinary reasonable care is not the minimum for engineers" (M. Davis). SCI ENG ETHICS 7, 291–297 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-001-0052-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-001-0052-4

Keywords

Navigation