Sémiotique 2021 : l’année en revue

Références

Augustyn, Prisca. 2021. Solar energy discourse in the Sunshine State. Sign Systems Studies 49(1/2). 63–85. https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2021.49.1-2.03.Search in Google Scholar

Bakrim, Noury. 2021. Pragmatic impacts, representations, and regulation. Semiotica 239(1/4). 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2018-0107.Search in Google Scholar

Bankov, Kristian. 2021. Face and trust: A semiotic inquiry into influencers, money, and amygdala. Sign Systems Studies 49(3–4). 527–542. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2021.49.3-4.14.Search in Google Scholar

Barnlund, Dean C. 1970. A transactional model of communication. In Johnnye Akin, Alvin Goldberg, Jospeh Stewart & Gail Myers (eds.), Language behavior: A book of readings in communication, 43–61. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783110878752.43Search in Google Scholar

Beattie, Geoffrey & Laura McGuire. 2021. Personality and climate change mitigation: A psychological and semiotic exploration of the sustainable choices of optimism. Semiotica 241(1/4). 237–273. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2019-0056.Search in Google Scholar

Beckett, Samuel. 1984. The collected shorter plays. New York: Grove Press.Search in Google Scholar

Biggio, Federico. 2021. Augmented facets: A semiotics analysis of augmented reality facial effects. Sign Systems Studies 49(3/4). 509–526. https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2021.49.3-4.13.Search in Google Scholar

Broden, Thomas F. 2021. A. J. Greimas in the world: Travels, translations, transmissions. Semiotica 243(1/4). 187–228. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2020-0040.Search in Google Scholar

Broden, Thomas & Stéphanie Walsh Matthews (eds.). 2017a. A. J. Greimas–life and semiotics/La vie et la sémiotique d’A. J. Greimas. Special issue. Semiotica 214(1/4). xiv, 438.Search in Google Scholar

Broden, Thomas & Stéphanie Walsh Matthews (eds.). 2017b. La sémiotique post-gramassienne/Semiotics post-Greimas. Special issue. Semiotica 219(1/4). x, 586.Search in Google Scholar

Candel, Daniel. 2021. Systematizing evil in literature: Twelve models for the analysis of narrative fiction. Semiotica 242(1/4). 141–168. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2020-0071.Search in Google Scholar

Cerrone, Mirko & Nelly Mäekivi. 2021. A zoosemiotic approach to the transactional model of communication. Semiotica 242(1/4). 39–62. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2020-0052.Search in Google Scholar

Ciecierski, Tadeusz. 2017. Jerzy Pelc. Studia Semiotyczne 31(1). 5–18.Search in Google Scholar

Ciecierski, Tadeusz. 2021a. Editorial. An introduction: Use and meaning – a special issue of Semiotica devoted to Jerzy Pelc. Semiotica 240(1/4). 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2021-0033.Search in Google Scholar

Ciecierski, Tadeusz. 2021b. Indexicality, meaning, use. Semiotica 238(1/4). 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2018-0056.Search in Google Scholar

Clemmer, Richard. 2021. Operationalizing Peirce’s syllabus in terms of icons and stereotypes. Semiotica 239(1/4). 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2018-0152.Search in Google Scholar

Dalvesco, Rebecca. 2021. The imagination, the conscious, and the unconscious in Jean Cocteau’s La belle et la Bête. Semiotica 238(1/4). 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2019-0047.Search in Google Scholar

Degani-Raz, Irit. 2021. Spatial diagrams and geometrical reasoning in the theater. Semiotica 239(1/4). 177–200. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2019-0052.Search in Google Scholar

Delante, Nimrod L. 2021. Surviving a natural disaster as a semiotic reformation of self and worldview. Semiotica 243(1/4). 353–386. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2018-0130.Search in Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles & Félix Guattari. 1987. A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

Demuru, Paulo. 2021. Hyper(in)visibility and urban-mediatic populism in São Paolo: A sociosemiotic approach. Semiotica 239(1/4). 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2019-0092.Search in Google Scholar

Due, Brian L. 2021. Semiotic resources for achieving face-to-screenface formation with a telepresence robot. Semiotica 238(1/4). 253–278. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2018-0148.Search in Google Scholar

Eagleton, Terry. 2010. On evil. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

El Shazly, Reham. 2021. Splits on Instagram: A case study of young adults’ selfies. Semiotica 241(1/4). 185–218. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2019-0099.Search in Google Scholar

Farias, Priscilla Lena & João Queiroz. 2004. “10cubes” and “3N3”: Using interactive diagrams to investigate Charles Peirce’s classification of signs. Semiotica 151(1/4). 41–63.10.1515/semi.2004.072Search in Google Scholar

Feil, Sebastian. 2021. Trajectories of anticipation: Preconceptuality and the task of reading habit. Sign Systems Studies 49(1/2). 191–215. https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2021.49.1-2.08.Search in Google Scholar

Floch, Anne-Marie. 1995. Identités visuelles. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Search in Google Scholar

Fuks, Orit. 2021. The distribution of handshapes in the established lexicon of Israeli Sign Language (ISL). Semiotica 242(1/4). 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2019-0049.Search in Google Scholar

Goguen, Joseph. 1999. An introduction to algebraic semiotics, with application to user interface design. In Chrystopher L. Nehanive (ed.), Computation for metaphors, analogy, and agents, 242–291. Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/3-540-48834-0_15Search in Google Scholar

Goguen, Joseph & Douglas Fox Harrell. 2005. Information visualization and semiotic morphisms. In Malcolm Grant (ed.), Studies in multidisciplinarity, vol. 2, 83–97. Amsterdam: Elsevier B. V.10.1016/S1571-0831(04)80035-2Search in Google Scholar

Gramigna, Remo & Cristina Voto. 2021. Notes on the semiotics of face recognition. Sign Systems Studies 49(3/4). 338–360. https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2021.49.3-4.05.Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas J. 1983[1966]. Structural semantics. Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas J. 1986. Sémantique structurale. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas J. 1987. On meaning: Selected writings in semiotic theory. London: Frances Pinter.Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas J. & Jacques Fontanille. 1991. Sémiotique des passions : Des états de choses aux états d’âmes. Paris: Seuil.Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas J. & Joseph Courtés. 1982. Semiotic and language: An analytical dictionary. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Greimas, Algirdas J. & François Rastier. 1968. The interaction of semiotic constraints. Yale French Studies 41. 86–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/2929667.Search in Google Scholar

Hammad, Manar. 1986. Expression spatiale de l’enonciation. Cruzeiro Semiótico 5. 38–79.Search in Google Scholar

He, Yufei. 2021. Towards a stratified metafunctional model of animation. Semiotica 239(1/4). 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2019-0078.Search in Google Scholar

Hébert, Louis. 2011. Semiotique et bouddhisme : Carré sémiotique et tétralemme (catuṣkoṭi). In Louis Hébert & Lucie Guillemette (eds.), Performances et objets culturels, 103–128. Québec: Presses de l’Université Laval.Search in Google Scholar

Hébert, Louis & Arthur Poirier-Roy. 2021. Modèles logiques de la structure élémentaire de la signification : Templum, prisme sémiotique, carré sémiotique, cube sémiotique et autres. Semiotica 238(1/4). 91–124. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2019-0096.Search in Google Scholar

Ibri, Ivo I. 2021. On the bottomless lake of firstness: Conjectures on the synthetic power of consciousness. Semiotica 243(1/4). 129–152. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2021-0120.Search in Google Scholar

Idone Cassone, Vincenzo. 2021. Gotta face ‘em all: Pokémon, Japanese animated characters, and the emergence of playful visual animism. Sign Systems Studies 49(3/4). 543–565. https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2021.49.3-4.15.Search in Google Scholar

Jadacki, Jacek & Witold Strawiński (eds.). 1996. W świecie znaków [In the world of signs]. Warsaw: PTF.Search in Google Scholar

Jardim, Marilia. 2021. The plastic of clothing and the construction of visual communication and interaction: A semiotic examination of the eighteenth-century French dress. Semiotica 242(1/4). 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2020-0050.Search in Google Scholar

Jing, Yi. 2021. Visual affect in films: A semiotic approach. Semiotica 239(1/4). 99–124. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2019-0081.Search in Google Scholar

Kendon, Adam. 2008. Some reflections on the relationship between “gesture” and “sign”. Gesture 8(3). 348–366. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.8.3.05ken.Search in Google Scholar

Konderak, Piotr. 2021. Towards an integration of semiosis – a cognitive semiotic perspective. Sign Systems Studies 49(1/2). 132–165. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2021.49.1-2.06.Search in Google Scholar

Kull, Kalevi & Timo Maran. 2013. Journals of semiotics in the world. Sign Systems Studies 41(1). 140–145. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2013.41.1.08.Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lenninger, Sara. 2021. Narratives and the semiotic freedom of children. Sign Systems Studies 49(1–2). 216–234. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2021.49.1-2.09.Search in Google Scholar

Leone, Massimo. 2021. Introduction: Studying the “facesphere”. Sign Systems Studies 49(3/4). 270–278. https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2021.49.3-4.01.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, David. 1973. Counterfactuals. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mantello, Peter. 2021. Fatal portraits: The selfie as agent of radicalization. Sign Systems Studies 49(3/4). 566–589. https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2021.49.3-4.16.Search in Google Scholar

Marino, Gabriele. 2021. Cultures of the (masked) face. Sign Systems Studies 49(3/4). 318–337. https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2021.49.3-4.04.Search in Google Scholar

Marshall, Guy Clarke & André Freitas. 2021. Measuring diagram quality through semiotic morphisms. Semiotica 239(1/4). 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2019-0029.Search in Google Scholar

McCrae, Robert R. & Paul T. Costa. 2013. Introduction to the empirical and theoretical status of the five-factor model of personality traits. In Thomas A. Widiger & Paul T. Costa (eds.), Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality, 15–27. Washington: American Psychological Association.10.1037/13939-002Search in Google Scholar

Midgley, Mary. 1984. Wickedness. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Nesher, Dan. 2021. Epistemic logic: All knowledge is based on our experience, and epistemic logic is the cognitive representation of our experiential confrontation in reality. Semiotica 238(1/4). 153–179. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2019-0026.Search in Google Scholar

Nešetřil, Jaroslav. 2005. Aesthetic for computers or how to measure a harmony. In Michel Emmer (ed.), The visual mind II, 35–59. Boston, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nuessel, Frank. 2018. The Greimas centennial in review. The American Journal of Semiotics 34(3/4). 431–451. https://doi.org/10.5840/ajs2018343/442.Search in Google Scholar

Nöth, Winfried. 2021. Peirce’s legacy for contemporary consciousness studies, the emergence of consciousness from qualia, and its evanescence in habits. Semiotica 243(1/4). 49–103. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2021-0117.Search in Google Scholar

Ojha, Amitash, Charles Forceville & Bippin Indurkyya. 2021. An experimental study of the effect of emotion lines in comics. Semiotica 243(1/4). 305–324. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2019-0079.Search in Google Scholar

Oliveira, Ana Claudia. 2004. Semiótica plástica. São Paolo: Hacker.Search in Google Scholar

Oliveira, Ana Claudia. 2008. Visualidade processual da apaarencia. In Ana Claudia Oliveira & Kathia Castilho (eds.), Corpo e moda: por uma comprensão di contemporaâneo, 93–104. São Paolo, Brasil: Estação das Letras e Cores Editora.Search in Google Scholar

Paulhus, Delroy L. & Kevin M. Williams. 2002. The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality 36. 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-6566(02)00505-6.Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1998. An outline classification of the sciences. In Peirce Edition Project (eds.), The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, vol. 2, 1893–1913. 258–262. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pelc, Jerzy. 1969. Meaning as an instrument. Semiotica 1(1). 26–48. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1969.1.1.26.Search in Google Scholar

Pelkey, Jamin. 2017. Greimas embodied: How kinesthetic opposition grounds the semiotic square. Semiotica 214(1/4). 277–305. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0188.Search in Google Scholar

Poulsen, Søren Vigild. 2021. Face off – a semiotic technology study of software for making deepfakes. Sign Systems Studies 49(3/4). 489–508. https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2021.49.3-4.12.Search in Google Scholar

Pärn, Katre. 2021. Towards the semiotics of the future: From anticipation to premediation. Sign Systems Studies 49(1/2). 108–131. https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2021.49.1-2.05.Search in Google Scholar

Ranta, Michael. 2021. The role of schemas and scripts in narration. Semiotica 241(1/4). 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2019-0071.Search in Google Scholar

Raposa, Michael L. 2021. Toward a Peircean logic of meditation. Semiotica 243(1/4). 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2021-0119.Search in Google Scholar

Rowlands, Mark. 2010. The new science of the mind: From extended mind to embodied phenomenology. Cambridge: MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262014557.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Sahakyan, Inna. 2021. Metaphor, induction and innovation: Getting outside the box. Sign Systems Studies 49(1/2). 166–190. https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2021.49.1-2.07.Search in Google Scholar

Santaella, Lucia. 2021. Consciousness and mind in Peirce: Distinctions and complementarities. Semiotica 243(1/4). 105–128. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2021-0118.Search in Google Scholar

Santangelo, Antonio. 2021. Culturally significant symbolic faces: For a sociosemiotics of faces in films. Sign Systems Studies 49(3/4). 418–436. https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2021.49.3-4.09.Search in Google Scholar

Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1916. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.Search in Google Scholar

Schiller, Devon. 2021. The face and the faceness: Iconicity in the early faciasemiotics of Paul Ekman, 1957–1978. Sign Systems Studies 49(3/4). 361–382. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2021.49.3-4.06.Search in Google Scholar

Secord, James A. 2004. Knowledge in transit. Isis 95(4). 654–672. https://doi.org/10.1086/430657.Search in Google Scholar

Sonneson, Göran. 1999. The signs of life in society – and out of it. Sign Systems Studies 27. 88–127. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.1999.27.05.Search in Google Scholar

Soro, Elsa. 2021. Urban-human faces and the semiotic right to the city: From the USSR propaganda machinery to the participatory city. Sign Systems Studies 49(3/4). 590–607. https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2021.49.3-4.17.Search in Google Scholar

Stano, Simona. 2021. The face of health in West and the East: A semio-cultural analysis. Sign Systems Studies 49(3/4). 298–317. https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2021.49.3-4.03.Search in Google Scholar

Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2000. Diagrams as a centerpiece of a Peircean epistemology. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 36(3). 357–384.Search in Google Scholar

Surace, Bruno. 2021. Semiotics of the pornographic face: From traditional porno to beautiful agony. Sign Systems Studies 49(3/4). 400–417. https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2021.49.3-4.08.Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, Evan. 2007. Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology and the sciences of mind. London: Belknap Press.Search in Google Scholar

Torres-Martínez, Sergio. 2021a. Vers une sémiotique sadienne. Semiotica 241(1/4). 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2017-0115.Search in Google Scholar

Torres-Martínez, Sergio. 2021b. Complexes, rule-following, and language games: Wittgenstein’s philosophical method and its relevance to semiotics. Semiotica 242(1/4). 63–100. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2019-0113.Search in Google Scholar

Tønnessen, Morten. 2021. Anticipating the societal transformation required to solve the environmental crisis in the 21st century. Sign Systems Studies 49(1/2). 12–62. https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2021.49.1-2.02.Search in Google Scholar

Varela, Francisco, Evan Thompson & Eleanor Rosch. 1991. The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/6730.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Vickers, Paul, Joe Faith & Nick Rossiter. 2013. Understanding visualization: A formal approach using category theory and semiotics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19(6). 1048–1061. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2012.294.Search in Google Scholar

Volli, Ugo. 2021. The transcendence of the face: A semiotic-linguistic path. Sign Systems Studies 49(3/4). 279–297. https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2021.49.3-4.02.Search in Google Scholar

von Uexküll, Jakob. 1909. Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere. Berlin: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

von Uexküll, Jakob. 1921. Umwelt und Innenwelt der Tiere 2: Vermehrte und verbesserte Auflage. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-24819-5Search in Google Scholar

Vygotsky, Lev S. 1997 [1931]. Mastering attention. In Robert Rieberd (ed.), The history and development higher mental functions (Collected works of Vygotsky 4). 153–177. Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4615-5939-9_9Search in Google Scholar

West, Donna E. 2021a. The dialogic nature of double consciousness and double stimulation: Implications from Peirce and Vygotsky. Sign Systems Studies 49(1/2). 235–261. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2021.49.1-2.10.Search in Google Scholar

West, Donna E. 2021b. The element of surprise in Peirce’s double consciousness paradigm. Semiotica 243(1/4). 11–47. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2021-0122.Search in Google Scholar

West, Donna E. 2021c. Peirce’s vocation for consciousness: An evolutionary account. Semiotica 243(1/4). 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2021-0123.Search in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1984 [1922]. Werkausgabe, Band 1: Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus/Tagebücher 1914–1916/Philosophische Untersuchungen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1984. Werkausgabe, Band 3: Philosophische Grammatik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Yanfei & Shojie Zhang. 2021. How Saussure is misinterpreted in cognitive grammar. Semiotica 239(1/4). 243–264. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2018-0102.Search in Google Scholar