Skip to main content
Log in

Temporal and spatial dimensions of knowledge: Implications for sustainable agriculture

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scholars have recognized the importance of local and indigenousknowledge in less industrialized countries. Few studies havebeen done on the diversity of knowledge communities in moreindustrialized countries, however, because of researcherassumptions about the spatial and temporal dimensions of localand scientific knowledge. A distinguishing feature of knowledgecommunities is the way that time and space are perceived. Thesedifferences are reflected in farmers' decision-making.Depending on farmers' knowledge orientations, they may utilizequite different criteria to determine the reliability andapplicability of new information. Advocates of sustainableagriculture, and proponents of on-farm research will benefit byrecognizing the diverse ways that farmers know and understandtheir farming systems in both less and more industrializedcountries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, K. & Bernhardt, K. (1995). Farming practices and adherenceto an alternative-conventional agricultural paradigm,Rural Sociology 60: 297–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M. (1989). Agroecology: A new research and development paradigm for world agriculture, in Paoletti, Stinner, & Lorenzoni (eds.), Agricultural ecology and environmen(pp. 37–46). New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M., ed. (1987). Agroecology: The scientific basis of alternative agriculture. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banuri, T. & Marglin, F.A., eds. (1993). Who will save the forests? Knowledge, power and environmental destruction. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlett, P., ed. (1980). Agricultural decision making: Anthropological contributions to Rural development. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J.W. (1982). Of time and enterprise: North American family farm management in a context of resource marginality. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benvenuti, B. (1962). Farming in cultural change. Assen: Royal Van Gorcum and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, W. (1977). The unsettling of America: Culture and agriculture. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beus, C. & Dunlap, R. (1990). Conventional versus alternative agriculture: The paradigmatic roots of debate, Rural Sociology 55: 590–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezdicek, D. & DePhelps, C. (1994). Innovative approaches for integrated research and educational programs, American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 9: 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggelaar, C. den (1991). Farming systems development: Synthesizing indigenous and scientific knowledge systems, Agriculture and Human Values 8 (1-2): 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1997). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brokensha, D., Warren, D.M. & Werner, O. (1980). Indigenous knowledge systems and development. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browder, J. (1995). Redemptive communities: Indigenous knowledge, colonist farming systems, and conservation of tropical forests, Agriculture and Human Values 12 (1): 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bultena, G., Hoiberg, E., Jarnagin, S. & Exner, R. (1992). Transition to a more sustainable agriculture in Iowa. Ames, IA: Department of Sociology, Sociological Report 166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch, L. (1978). On understanding understanding: Two views of communication, Rural Sociology 43: 450–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch, L., Lacy, W., Burkhardt, J. & Lacy, L. (1991). Plants, power, and profit. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bye, P. & Fonte, M. (1993). New functions of rural space in Western Europe: A challenge for agricultural techniques, International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 3: 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R., Pacey, A. & Thrupp, L.A. (1989). Farmer first: Farmer innovation and agricultural research. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglass, G. (1984). Agricultural sustainability in a changing world order. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitchen, J. (1991). Endangered spaces, enduring places. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • FitzSimmons, M. (1986). The new industrial agriculture: The regional integration of specialty crop production, Economic Geography 62 (4): 334–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. & Gordon, C., eds. (1972). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenberger, C.D. (1984). Food for tomorrow? Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, R.P. & Cordray, S.M. (1994). Making sense of sustainability: Nine answers to 'What should be sustained?', RuraSociology 59: 311–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladwin, C. (1989). Indigenous knowledge systems, the cognitive revolution, and agricultural decision making, Agriculture and Human Values 6 (3): 32–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottdiener, M. (1993). A Marx for our time: Henri Lefebvre and the production of space, Sociological Theory 11: 129–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greider, T. & Garkovich, L. (1994). Landscapes: The social construction of nature and the environment, Rural Sociology 59: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1990). The condition of postmodernity. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, R.R. (1979). Small farm development: Understanding and improving farming systems in the humid tropics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassaein, N. & Kloppenburg Jr, J.R. (1995). Where the grass grows again: Knowledge exchange in the sustainable agriculture movement, Rural Sociology 60: 721–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howes, M. & Chambers, R. (1980). Indigenous technical knowledge: Analysis, implications and issues, in D. Brokensha, D.M. Warren & O. Werner (eds.), Indigenous knowledge systems and development(pp.323–334). Landham, MD: University of America Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, W. (1980). New roots for agriculture. San Francisco: Friends of the Earth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloppenburg Jr, J. (1988). First the seed: The political economy of plant biotechnology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloppenburg Jr, J. (1991). Social theory and the de/reconstruction of agricultural science: Local knowledge for an alternative agriculture, Rural Sociology 56: 519–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluckhohn, F. & Strodbeck, F. (1961). Variations in valueorientations: A theory tested in five cultures. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverely Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. ([1974] 1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logsdon, G. (1994). At nature's pace: Farming and the American dream. New York: Patheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, N. & Long, A. (1992). Battlefields of knowledge. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyden, F. (1988). Value orientations in public decision making, Policy Studies Journal 16: 843–856.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, S. & Dickinson, J.M. (1978), Obstacles to the development of a capitalist agriculture, Journal of Peasant Studies5: 466–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, T., Lowe, P. & Whatmore, S., eds. (1990). Rural restructuring: Global processes and their responses. London: David Fulton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, R. & Titilola, S.T. (1992). Social and economic dimensions of local knowledge systems in African sustainable agriculture, Sociologia Ruralis 32: 264–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCorkle, C. (1989). Toward a knowledge of local knowledge and its importance for agricultural RD and E, Agriculture and Human Values 6 (3): 4–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mormont, M. (1987). Rural nature and urban natures, Sociologia Ruralis27: 3-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newby, H. (1990). Urbanization and the rural class structure, in W. Friedland, L. Busch, F. Buttel & A. Rudy (eds.), Toward a New Political Economy of Agriculture(pp. 255–283). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raedeke, A., Rikoon, J.S. & Heffernan, W. (1994). Nitrogen fertilizer management: A qualitative examination of the decision making process. Paper presented at the Southern Rural Sociological Association annual meeting, Nashville, Tennesse.

  • Rhoades, R.E. & Booth, R.H. (1982). Farmer-back-to farmer: A model for generating acceptable agricultural technology, Agricultural Administration 11: 127–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, P. (1993). Cultivation: Knowledge or performance?' in M. Hobart (ed.), An Anthropological Critique of Development: The Growth of Ignorance(pp. 61–78). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, P. (1985). Indigenous agricultural revolution: Ecology and food production in West Africa. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rikoon, J.S. (1995). Conflicts of knowledge and the cultural construction of the environment: Implications for the mediation of ecology and democracy, Zemědělskå Ekonomika 41: 161–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rikoon, J.S. (1992). Sociological factors affecting farmers' adoption of alternative farming practices for water quality protection and improvement, in Missouri MESA Project Plan, Vol. 2: Research(pp. 225–240). Columbia: USDAAgricultural Research Service, University of Missouri, and US Geological Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M. (1983). Diffusions of innovations. NewYork: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosmann, R. (1994). Farmer initiated on-farm research, American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 9: 34–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, J. (1987). Knowledge and power: Toward a political philosophy of science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swidler, A. & Arditi, J. (1994). The new sociology of knowledge, Annual Review of Sociology 20: 305–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. & Scoones, I. (1994). Challenging the populist perspective: Rural people's knowledge, agricultural research, and extension practice, Agriculture and Human Values 11 (2-3): 58–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, D.M. (1994). Indigenous agricultural knowledge, technology, and social change, in G, McIsaac & W.R. Edwards (eds.), Sustainable agriculture in the American midwest(pp. 35–53). Urbana: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raedeke, A.H., Rikoon, J.S. Temporal and spatial dimensions of knowledge: Implications for sustainable agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values 14, 145–158 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007346929150

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007346929150

Navigation