Abstract
In the early and often ignored 1934 essay ‘Reflections on the Philosophy of Hitlerism’, Levinas identifies a historically dominant form of politics rooted in the ontological reduction of the other to the same that provides intellectual justification for physical violence against the other. The ethical relation aims to overcome this political violence by thinking from the alterity of the other. The turn away from the political to the ethical does, however, lead to a problem – the third (le tiers) – that cannot be resolved by the ethical relation and so necessitates a return to the political. The political returned to is not the same as that left, but privileges the ethical relation and involves decisions about how to realize a prior norm: justice. This has given rise to debate in the literature regarding the relationship between the ethical and political that pits an oppositional account against an entwined one. I defend the latter, but argue that it depends upon two issues that are problematic for Levinas’s attempted overcoming of ontological forms of violence. Specifically, his (1) claim that this form of politics entails a ‘good’ form of violence, and (2) insistence that the political decision required to realize the ethically inspired conception of politics is compatible with his theory of substitution. I argue that the former undermines his claim that an ethically inspired politics is fundamentally different to an ontologically inspired one, while the political decision upon which his ethically inspired politics depends is incompatible with his notion of substitution.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernasconi, R. (1999) The third party: Levinas on the intersection of the ethical and the political. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 30(1): 76–87.
Botwinick, A. (2014) Emmanuel Levinas and the Limits to Ethics: A Critique and a Re-Appropriation. Routledge: New York.
Caro, J. (2009) Levinas and the Palestinians. Philosophy and Social Criticism 35(6): 671–684.
Critchley, S. (1999) The Ethics of Deconstruction, 2nd edn. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Derrida, J. (2002) Violence and Metaphysics: An Essay on the Thought of Emmanuel Levinas, in Writing and Difference, trans. Alan Bass. London: Routledge, pp. 97–192.
De Vries, H. (2002) Religion and Violence: Philosophical Perspectives from Kant to Derrida. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Fagan, M. (2009) The Inseparability of Ethics and Politics: Rethinking the Third in Emmanuel Levinas. Contemporary Political Theory 8: 5–22.
Hägglund, M. (2008) Radical Atheism: Derrida and the Time of Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Levinas, E. (1969) Totality and Infinity, trans. Alphonso Lingis. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
Levinas, E. (1981) Otherwise than Being or Beyond Essence, trans. Alphonso Lingis. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
Levinas, E. (1985) Ethics and Infinity: Conversations with Philippe Nemo, trans. Richard A. Cohen. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
Levinas, E. and Kearney, R. (1986) Dialogue with Emmanuel Levinas. In: R. A. Cohen (ed.) Face to Face with Levinas. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 13–34.
Levinas, E. (1990) Reflections on the Philosophy of Hitlerism, trans. Seán Hand. Critical Inquiry 17(1): 62–71.
Levinas, E. (1996) Basic Philosophical Writings, trans. Adriaan T. Peperzak, Simon Critchley, and Robert Bernasconi. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Levinas, E. (1998a) Entre Nous: Thinking of the Other, trans. Michael B. Smith and Barbara Harshav. New York: Columbia University Press.
Levinas, E. (1998b) Of God Who Comes to Mind, trans. Bettina Bergo. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Levinas, E. (1999) Alterity and Transcendence, trans. Michael B. Smith. New York: Columbia University Press.
Levinas, E. (2000) God, Death, and Time, trans. Bettina Bergo, edited by Jacques Rolland. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Levinas, E. (2001a), Is it Righteous to Be? Interview with Levinas, ed. Jill Robbins, trans. Jill Robbins. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Levinas, E. (2001b), Existence and Existents, trans. Alphonso Lingis. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
Levinas, E. (2004) Unforeseen History, trans. Nidra Poller. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Levinas, E. (2006) Humanism of the Other, trans. Nidra Poller. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Loumansky, A. (2009) Reply to Fagan: Hanging God at Auschwitz: The Necessity of a Solitary Encounter with the Other as the Genesis of Levinasian Ethics. Contemporary Political Theory 8(1): 23–43.
Morgan, M.L. (2007) Discovering Levinas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Perpich, D. (2008) The Ethics of Emmanuel Levinas. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Rae, G. (2016) The Problem of Political Foundations in Carl Schmitt and Emmanuel Levinas. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Topolski, A. (2015) Arendt, Levinas and a Politics of Relationality. London: Rowman and Littlefield International.
Acknowledgements
This paper forms part of the activities for the Conex Marie Skłodowska-Curie Research Project ‘Sovereignty and Law: Between Ethics and Politics’ co-funded by the Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for Research, Technological Development and Demonstration (600371), The Spanish Ministry of the Economy and Competitivity (COFUND2013-40258), The Spanish Ministry for Education, Culture, and Sport (CEI-15-17), and Banco Santander. More information can be found at https://sovereigntyandlaw.wordpress.com/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rae, G. The politics of justice: Levinas, violence, and the ethical–political relation. Contemp Polit Theory 17, 49–68 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-017-0141-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-017-0141-z