Abstract
In H.M. Advocate v. Grimmond 1 the judge in a Scottish High Court trial refused permission for expert psychological evidence to be admitted on behalf of the Crown in a prosecution involving sexual offences against two children. The Crown had sought to lead an expert witness to explain to the jury about patterns of disclosure in child sexual abuse cases. The case was remarkable, not so much for the strict application of the longstanding rule in R. v. Turner that constrains the use in the courtroom of expert evidence from the behavioural sciences, but for the way in which the arguments presented by the Crown in Grimmond resonate with enduring feminist critiques regarding the treatment of women in rape trials. The theoretical issues raised by the decision include the quest for context to counter rigid evidential frameworks, and the choice of a child sexual abuse case as the medium for challenging the boundaries of the admissibility of expert evidence in the courtroom. The ramifications of Grimmond are tangible as legislation intended to benefit children and women has already been enacted by the Scottish Parliament to ameliorate the effects of the decision. This article suggests that while this legislation should be given a cautious welcome it remains to be seen whether the heralded benefits will actually materialise.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
REFERENCES
Allen, H., Justice Unbalanced: Gender, Psychiatry and Judicial Decisions (Buckingham: Open University Press, 1987).
Bristow, A., "State v. Marks: An Analysis of Expert Testimony on Rape Trauma Syndrome", Victimology 9 (1984), 273–281.
Brown, B., Burman, M. & Jamieson, L., Sex Crimes on Trial (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1993).
Eisen, M., Quas, J. & Goodman, G., Memory and Suggestibility in the Forensic Interview (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002).
Gordon, G., Editorial Commentary to H.M. Advocate v Grimmond 2001 S.C.C.R. 708 at 713–714.
Hutchby, I. & Moran-Ellis, J., Children and Social Competence (London: Falmer Press, 1998).
Kibble, N., "The Sexual History Provisions: Charting a Course between Inflexible Legislative Rules and Wholly Untrammelled Judicial Discretion?", Criminal Law Review [2000], 274–292.
Lauderdale, H., "The Admissibility of Rape Trauma Syndrome", Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 75 (1984), 1366–1416.
Lees, S., Carnal Knowledge on Trial (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1996).
Memon, A. & Bull, R., eds., Handbook of the Psychology of Interviewing (Chichester, Wiley, 1999).
Monahan, J. & Walker, L., "Social Science Research in Law: A New Paradigm", American Psychologist 43 (1988), 465–472.
Murphy, S., "Assisting the Jury in Understanding Victimization: Expert Psychological Testimony Battered Women Syndrome and Rape Trauma Syndrome", Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems 25 (1992), 277–312.
Nicolson, D., "Truth, Reason and Justice: Epistemology and Politics in Evidence Discourse", Modern Law Review 57 (1994), 726.
O'Donovan, K., "Law's Knowledge: the Judge, the Expert, the Battered Woman, and Her Syndrome", Journal of Law and Society 20 (1993), 427–437.
Page, M. & Precey, G., "Child Protection Concerns When Questioning Children", in H. Westcott, G. Davies and R. Bull eds., Children's Testimony: A Handbook of Psychological Research and Forensic Practice (Chichester: Wiley Series in the Psychology of Crime, Policing and Law, 2002).
Raitt, F. & Zeedyk, S., The Implicit Relation of Psychology and Law: Women and Syndrome Evidence (London: Routledge, 2000).
Sebba, L., "Victims' Rights and Legal Strategies: Israel as a Case Study", Criminal Law Forum 11 (2000), 47–100.
Spencer, J. & Flin, R., The Evidence of Children (London: Blackstone, 1992).
The Home Office, Speaking Up for Justice: Report of the Interdepartmental Working Group on the treatment of Vulnerable or Intimidated Witnesses in the Criminal Justice System (London: Home Office, 1998).
Temkin, J., "Prosecuting and Defending Rape: Perspectives from the Bar", Journal of Law and Society 27(2) (2000), 219–248.
Temkin, J., Rape and the Legal Process (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2nd edn. 2003).
Tetreault, P., "Rape Myth Acceptance: A Case for Providing Educational Expert Testimony in Rape Jury Trials", Behavioral Sciences and the Law 7 (1989), 243–257.
Twining, W., Re-Thinking Evidence: Exploratory Essays (Oxford: Blackwell, 1990).
Walker & Walker, The Law of Evidence in Scotland (Edinburgh: Butterworth, 2nd edn., M. Ross with J. Chalmers, 2000).
Wells, C., "Battered Woman Syndrome and Defences to Homicide: Where Now?", Legal Studies 14 (1994), 266–276.
Westcott, H., Davies, G. & Bull, R., Children's Testimony: A Handbook of Psychological Research and Forensic Practice (Chichester: Wiley Series in the Psychology of Crime, Policing and Law, 2002).
Wigmore, J.H., Wigmore on Evidence, volume IIIA (Boston: Little, Brown, 1937. Reprinted and edited by Chadbourne, Boston: Little, Brown, 1970).
Williams, G., "Child Witnesses" in Criminal Law Essays in Honour of J.C. Smith, ed. P. Smith (London: Butterworth, 1987).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Raitt, F.E. Expert Evidence As Context: Historical Patterns and Contemporary Attitudes in the Prosecution of Sexual Offences. Feminist Legal Studies 12, 233–244 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FEST.0000043340.62448.d6
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FEST.0000043340.62448.d6