What is the real issue at stake in discussions of "moralexplanation"? There isn't one; there are many. The standingof purported moral properties and problems about ourepistemic or semantic access to them are of concern bothfrom within and without moral practice. An account of theirpotential contribution to explaining our values, beliefs,conduct, practices, etc. can help in these respects. Byexamining some claims made about moral explanation inJudith Thompson's and Gilbert Harman's Moral Relativism andMoral Objectivity, I try to suggest a worthwhile account ofthis potential explanatory contribution.
CITATION STYLE
Railton, P., Harman, G., & Thomson, J. J. (1998). Moral Explanation and Moral Objectivity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 58(1), 175. https://doi.org/10.2307/2653637
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.