Skip to main content
Log in

How a Kantian Can Accept Evolutionary Metaethics

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contrary to widely held assumptions, an evolutionary metaethics need not be non-cognitivist. I define evolutionary metaethics as the claim that certain phenotypic traits expressing certain genes are both necessary and sufficient for explanation of all other phenotypic traits we consider morally significant. A review of the influential cognitivist Immanuel Kant‘s metaethics shows that much of his ethical theory is independent of the anti-naturalist metaphysics of transcendental idealism which itself is incompatible with evolutionary metaethics. By matching those independent aspects to an evolutionary metaethics a cognitivist Kantian evolutionary metaethical theory is a possibility for researchers to consider.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beck, Lewis White: 1960, A Commentary on Kant's ‘Critique of Practical Reason’, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradie, Michael: 1994, The Secret Chain: Evolution and Ethics, SUNY Press, Albany NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles: 1871, The Descent of Man, reprint Princeton University Press, 1981.

  • Gibbard, Alan: 1990, ‘Norms, Discussion, and Ritual: Evolutionary Puzzles’, Ethics 100, 787–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbard, Alan: 1992, Wise Choices, Apt Feelings, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, David: 1939–40, Treatise of Human Nature, ed. L.A. Selby-Bigge, rev. P.H. Nidditch, Oxford, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheson, Francis: 1725, Inquiry into the Original of our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue. Reprinted in Collected Works of Francis Hutcheson, Vol. I, Georg Olms Verlag, Hildesheim, 1971.

  • Kahane, Howard: 1995, Contract Ethics, Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel: 1781, Critique of Pure Reason. Page numbers refer to first (A) and second (B) editions. Translations are my own based upon Kritik der reinen Vernunft ed. R. Schmidt, Felix Meiner Verlag, Hamburg, 1926.

  • Kant, Immanuel: 1785, Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals. Page numbers refer to volume IV of Kants gesammelte Schriften, 29 vols., Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1902 and after. Translations are my own.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel: 1788, Critique of Practical Reason. Page numbers refer to volume V of Kants gesammelte Schriften, 29 vols., Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1902 and after. Translations are my own.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, Philip: 1985 Vaulting Ambition, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, Philip: 1993, ‘The Evolution of Human Altruism’, Journal of Philosophy 90, 497–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, Philip: 1994, ‘Four Ways of Biologicizing Ethics’, in Sober (eds.), Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology, MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 439–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsden, Charles and Wilson, E.O.: 1981, Genes, Mind, and Culture, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, Robert: 1981, Philosophical Explanations, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, Stephen, and Bloom, Paul: 1990, ‘Natural Language and Natural Selection’, Behavioural and Brain Sciences 13, 707–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachels, James: 1992, Created From Animals: The Moral Implications of Darwinism, Oxford.

  • Rauscher, Frederick: 1995, ‘Kant's Conflation of Pure Practical Reason and Will’, Proceedings of the Eighth International Kant Congress, Vol. II, Marquette University Press, Milwaukee, 579–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauscher, Frederick: 1996, ‘Pure Reason and the Moral Law: A Source of Kant's Critical Philosophy’, History of Philosophy Quarterly 13, 255–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John: 1971, A Theory of Justice, Belknap Press of the Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, Michael: 1986, Taking Darwin Seriously, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, Michael: 1990, ‘Evolutionary Ethics and the Search for Predecessors: Kant, Hume, and All the Way Back to Aristotle?’, Social Philosophy and Policy 8, 59–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, Michael, and Wilson, E.O.: 1986, ‘Moral Philosophy as Applied Science’, Philosophy 61, 173–192. Reprinted in Sober (ed.), Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology, MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 421–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, Elliott: 1984, The Nature of Selection, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, Elliott: 1993, Philosophy of Biology, Westview Press, Boulder CO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, Elliott: 1994a, ‘Models of Cultural Evolution’, in Sober (ed.), Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology, MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 477–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, Elliott: 1994b, ‘Prospects for an Evolutionary Ethics’, in From a Biological Point of View, Cambridge University Press, New York, 93–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Herbert: 1879, The Data of Ethics, Thomas Y. Crowell & Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uyenoyama, Marcy and Marcus Feldman: 1992, ‘Altruism: Some Theoretical Ambiguities’, in Keller and Lloyd (eds.), Keywords in Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O.: 1978, On Human Nature, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O.: 1984, Biophilia, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

RAUSCHER, F. How a Kantian Can Accept Evolutionary Metaethics. Biology & Philosophy 12, 303–326 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006521907071

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006521907071

Navigation