Abstract
The normative figure in Western feminism remains the liberal autonomous individual of modernity. ‹Other’ women are those who have their freedom to choose restricted. Typically, ‹other’ women are those burdened by culture and hindered by their communities from entering modernity. If we remain in the terrain of thinking about women as vulnerable or imperilled, and some women as particularly imperilled, as we generally do of Muslim women, we remain squarely within the framework of patriarchy understood as abstracted from all other systems. A modernity/premodernity distinction will continue to invade any projects intending to help Muslim women. This paper shows the persistence of the modernity/premodernity distinction in contemporary debates around applying Sharia law to the settlement of family law disputes under the Arbitration Act in Ontario, Canada. I argue below that in their concern to curtail conservative and patriarchal forces within the Muslim community, Canadian feminists (both Muslim and Non-Muslim) utilized frameworks that installed a secular/religious divide that functions as a colour line, marking the difference between the modern, enlightened West, and tribal, religious Muslims. I suggest that feminist responses might have helped to sustain a new form of governmentality, one in which the productive power of the imperilled Muslim woman functions to keep in line Muslim communities at the same time that it defuses more radical feminist and anti-racist critique of conservative religious forces. I end by exploring how this effect could have been restricted.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Hibri A. (1999) Is Western Patriarchal Feminism Good for Third World/Minority Women? In: J. Cohen, M. Howard, M.C. Nussbaum (eds.) Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? New Jersey: Princeton University Press, pp 41–46
Anthias F. (2002) Beyond Feminism and Multiculturalism: Locating Difference and the Politics of Location. Women’s Studies International Forum 25 3:275–286
Armstrong S. (2004) Criminal Justice. Commentary. Chatelaine 77:152–157
Asad T. (2003) Formations of the Secular. Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford, Stanford University Press
Asad, T., “Reflections on Laicite and the Public Sphere” (Keynote address), Beirut Conference on Public Spheres (22–24 October 2004). http://www.islamamerica.org/articles.cfm/article_id/94
Berlant L. (1997) The Queen of America Goes to Washington City. Durham, N.C., Duke University Press
Boyd, M., “Dispute Resolution in Family Law: Protecting Choice, Promoting Inclusion” (December 2004). http: www.attorneygeneral.jus.gov.on.ca/english/about/pubs/boyd/executivesummary. pdf
Brunet, A., in Montreal Gazette, C.P. (14 April 2005)
Canada Council for Muslim Women, “An Open Letter to Premier Dalton McGuinty and Attorney General Michael Bryant” (n.d.). http://www.ccmw.com/shariaincanda/ Letter%20to%20Ontario%20Premier%20Attorney%20General.htm
Delgado R., Stefancic J. (1996) Cosmopolitan Inside Out: International Norms and the Struggle for Civil Rights and Local Justice. Connecticut Law Review 27 3:773
De Sousa, M., “Keep Islamic Law out of Canada, Quebec Politicians Urge”, Montreal Gazette (11 March 2005), A1
Dimanno, R., “Sharia Solution a fair one, and not racist”, Toronto Star (16␣September 2005), A2
Elgert, K., “Islamic Law a Step Toward Legal Apartheid”, Edmonton Journal (4␣December 2003), A19
Ezekiel J. (2005) Magritte Meets Maghreb: This is Not a Veil. Australian Feminist Studies 20 47:231–243
Fekete L. (2004) Anti-Muslim Racism and the European Security State. Race & Class 46 1:3–29
Fournier, P. (for The Canadian Council of Muslim Women), “The Reception of Muslim Family Law in Western Liberal States” (2004). http://www.ccmw.com/Position%20Papers/Pascale%20paper.doc
Gokariksel B., Mitchell K. (2005) Veiling, Secularism, and the Neo-liberal Subject: National Narratives and Supranational Desires in Turkey and France. Global Networks 5/2:147–165
Grewal I. (1999) Women’s Rights as Human Rights: Feminist Practices, Global Feminism and Human Rights Regimes in Transnationality. Citizenship Studies 3 3:337–354
Grewal I. (2005) Transnational America. Feminisms, Diasporas, Neoliberalisms. Durham, N.C., Duke University Press
Hage G. (2000) White Nation: Fantasies of White Supremacy in a Multicultural Society. London: Routledge
Harris, G., “Sharia is not a Law by Canadian standards”, Vancouver Sun (15 December 2003), A15
Honig B. (1999) ‹My Culture Made me Do it’: Response to Okin. In: J. Cohen, M. Howard, M.C. Nussbaum (eds.) Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? New Jersey: Princeton University Press, pp. 35–40
Hurst, L., “Distortions and Red Herrings”, Toronto Star (17 September 2005), A6
Jamal A. (2005) Transnational Feminism as Critical Practice: A Reading of Feminist Discourses in Pakistan. Meridians 5 2:57–82
Kampmark B. (2003) Islam, Women and Australia’s Cultural Discourse of Terror. Hecate 29 1:86–105
Narayan U. (1997) Dislocating Cultures. Identities, Traditions, and Third World Feminism. New York: Routledge
Peritz, I., “Ebadi Decries Islamic Law for Canada”, Globe and Mail (14 June 2005), A7
Public Meeting, “International Campaign Against Sharia Courts in Canada”, Oriole Community Centre, 2975 Don Mills Rd., Toronto, ON (26 June 2004)
Quillen C. (2001) Reply to Rey Chow and Martha Nussbaum. Signs 27 1: 87–124
Rajagopal B. (2003) International Law from Below: Development, Social Movements and Third World Resistance. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Ray S. (2003), Against Earnestness: Performing the Political in Feminist Theory. Journal of Practical Feminist Philosophy 3 1:68–79
Razack S.H. (2004a) Imperilled Muslim Women, Dangerous Muslim Men and Civilised Europeans: Legal and Social Responses to Forced Marriages. Feminist Legal Studies 12 2:129–174
Razack S.H. (2004b) Dark Threats and White Knights: The Somalia Affair, Peacekeeping and the New Imperialism. Toronto, University of Toronto Press
Razack, S. “‹Your Client Has a Profile’: Race and Security in Canada”, Working paper, Court Challenges Program (May 2006)
Siddiqui, H., “Sharia is Gone but Fear and Hostility Remain”, Toronto Star (15␣September 2005), A25
Singh, S.H., “Religious Law Undermines Loyalty to Canada”, Vancouver Sun (10␣December 2003), A23
Sivanandan A. (2006) Race, Terror and Civil Society. Race & Class 47 3: 1–8
Volpp L. (2001) Feminism Versus Multiculturalism. Columbia Law Review 101:1181–1218
Warren, D., “Multiculturalism – From Britannia to Sharia”, National Post (8␣December 2003), A14
Wikan, U., “Honour Killings and the Problem of Justice in Modern-day Europe”, Paper Presented at the Conference “Social Development, Social Inequalities and Social Justice” (Toronto: Jean Piaget Society, 4 June 2004)
Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund, “Submission to Marion Boyd in Relation to her Review of the Arbitration Act” (17 September 2004). http://www.leaf.ca/legal-pdfs/Ontario%20Arbitration%20Act%20–%20Submission%20to %20Ontario%20Government.pdf
Women Living under Muslim Laws, “Call for Action: Support Canadian Women’s Struggle Against Sharia Courts” (7 April 2005). http://www.wluml.org/english/actionsfulltxt.shtml?cmd[156] = i-156-180177
Yelaja, P. & Benzie, R., “McGuinty: No Sharia Law”, Toronto Star (12 September 2005), A1
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Razack, S.H. The ‘Sharia Law Debate’ in Ontario: The Modernity/Premodernity Distinction in Legal Efforts to Protect Women from Culture. Feminist Legal Stud 15, 3–32 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-006-9050-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-006-9050-x