Abstract
An attempt is made to defend realism and the absence of space-like causation in quantum mechanics, by invoking indeterminism and a new necessary condition for stochastic causality, we term robustness. This condition is defended against recent critical attacks by Cartwright and Jones, and by Healey, and the violation of the robustness condition in Bell-type correlation experiments is shown to follow if an appropriate interpretation of the state vector is employed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
K. R. Popper,The Logic of Scientific Discovery Chap. 9 (Hutchinson, London, 1959).
K. R. Popper,Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics (Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa, New Jersey, 1982).
P. Suppes,A Probabilistic Theory of Causality (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1970).
B. Skyrms,Causal Necessity (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1980).
W. C. Salmon,Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1984).
N. Cartwright,Noûs 13, 419 (1979).
N. Cartwright,Nature's Capacities and Their Measurement (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1989).
E. Eells,Probabilistic Causality (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991).
D. Lewis,Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1986), p. 178.
M. L. G. Redhead, Relativity and quantum mechanics—Conflict or peaceful coexistence? inNew Techniques and Ideas in Quantum Measurement Theory [Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. D. M. Greenberger, ed.,480, 14 (1986)].
M. L. G. Redhead,Incompleteness, Nonlocality, and Realism, 2nd impression (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1989), Preface and Sec. 4.4.
M. L. G. Redhead, Nonfactorizability, Stochastic Causality and Passion-at-a-Distance, inPhilosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory, J. T. Cushing and E. McMullin, eds. (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana, 1989), p. 145.
M. L. G. Redhead,Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 40, 429 (1990).
M. L. G. Redhead, Explanation inExplanation and its Limits, D. Knowles, ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), p. 148.
P. M. Morse and H. Feshbach,Methods of Theoretical Physics, Part 1 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1953).
R. Healey, Causation, robustness and EPR,Phil. Sci. (forthcoming).
N. Cartwright, A Comparison of Healey and Cartwright/Jones on Robustness (private communication).
J. L. Mackie,The Cement of the Universe (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1974), p. 62.
D. R. Cox and H. D. Miller,The Theory of Stochastic Processes (Methuen, London, 1965).
H. Reichenbach,The Philosophy of Space and Time (Dover, New York, 1958), p. 135 ff.
N. Cartwright and M. Jones, How to hunt quantum causes,Erkenntnis (forthcoming).
J. N. Butterfield, David Lewis Meets John Bell,Phil. Sci. (forthcoming).
N. D. Mermin,Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3373 (1990).
D. M. Greenberger, M. A. Horne, and A. Zeilinger, inBell's Theorem, Quantum Theory, and Conceptions of the Universe, M. Kafatos, ed. (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1989), p. 69.
R. Clifton,Nonlocality in Quantum Mechanics: Signalling, Counterfactuals, Probability and Causation, Ph.D. thesis (Cambridge University, 1991), Chapter 4.
A. Shimony, Controllable and uncontrollable non-locality, inProceedings of the International Symposium: Foundations of Quantum Mechanics in the Light of New Technology, S. Kamefuchiet al., eds. (Physical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 1984), p. 225.
D. Bohm,Phys. Rev. 85, 166 (1952).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper is dedicated to Sir Karl Popper on the occasion of his 90th birthday.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Redhead, M. Propensities, correlations, and metaphysics. Found Phys 22, 381–394 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01883904
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01883904