Skip to main content
Log in

Propensities, correlations, and metaphysics

  • Part IV. Invited Papers Dedicated To Sir Karl Popper
  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An attempt is made to defend realism and the absence of space-like causation in quantum mechanics, by invoking indeterminism and a new necessary condition for stochastic causality, we term robustness. This condition is defended against recent critical attacks by Cartwright and Jones, and by Healey, and the violation of the robustness condition in Bell-type correlation experiments is shown to follow if an appropriate interpretation of the state vector is employed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. R. Popper,The Logic of Scientific Discovery Chap. 9 (Hutchinson, London, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. R. Popper,Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics (Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa, New Jersey, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Suppes,A Probabilistic Theory of Causality (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. Skyrms,Causal Necessity (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  5. W. C. Salmon,Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  6. N. Cartwright,Noûs 13, 419 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  7. N. Cartwright,Nature's Capacities and Their Measurement (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Eells,Probabilistic Causality (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Lewis,Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1986), p. 178.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. L. G. Redhead, Relativity and quantum mechanics—Conflict or peaceful coexistence? inNew Techniques and Ideas in Quantum Measurement Theory [Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. D. M. Greenberger, ed.,480, 14 (1986)].

  11. M. L. G. Redhead,Incompleteness, Nonlocality, and Realism, 2nd impression (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1989), Preface and Sec. 4.4.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. L. G. Redhead, Nonfactorizability, Stochastic Causality and Passion-at-a-Distance, inPhilosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory, J. T. Cushing and E. McMullin, eds. (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana, 1989), p. 145.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. L. G. Redhead,Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 40, 429 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. L. G. Redhead, Explanation inExplanation and its Limits, D. Knowles, ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge), p. 148.

  15. P. M. Morse and H. Feshbach,Methods of Theoretical Physics, Part 1 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Healey, Causation, robustness and EPR,Phil. Sci. (forthcoming).

  17. N. Cartwright, A Comparison of Healey and Cartwright/Jones on Robustness (private communication).

  18. J. L. Mackie,The Cement of the Universe (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1974), p. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. R. Cox and H. D. Miller,The Theory of Stochastic Processes (Methuen, London, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. Reichenbach,The Philosophy of Space and Time (Dover, New York, 1958), p. 135 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  21. N. Cartwright and M. Jones, How to hunt quantum causes,Erkenntnis (forthcoming).

  22. J. N. Butterfield, David Lewis Meets John Bell,Phil. Sci. (forthcoming).

  23. N. D. Mermin,Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3373 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  24. D. M. Greenberger, M. A. Horne, and A. Zeilinger, inBell's Theorem, Quantum Theory, and Conceptions of the Universe, M. Kafatos, ed. (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1989), p. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. Clifton,Nonlocality in Quantum Mechanics: Signalling, Counterfactuals, Probability and Causation, Ph.D. thesis (Cambridge University, 1991), Chapter 4.

  26. A. Shimony, Controllable and uncontrollable non-locality, inProceedings of the International Symposium: Foundations of Quantum Mechanics in the Light of New Technology, S. Kamefuchiet al., eds. (Physical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 1984), p. 225.

    Google Scholar 

  27. D. Bohm,Phys. Rev. 85, 166 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper is dedicated to Sir Karl Popper on the occasion of his 90th birthday.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Redhead, M. Propensities, correlations, and metaphysics. Found Phys 22, 381–394 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01883904

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01883904

Keywords

Navigation