Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing employee responses to teamworking and organisational change

  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper surveys recent case study evidence addressing the implications of task-based teamworking for front-line employees. It refers primarily to three manufacturing companies in Britain. All three companies faced significant external challenges deriving from increased competition, and in each case teamworking was perceived as a key aspect of organisational restructuring. The paper illustrates the complexity of employee responses, arguing that there is no ‘one best way’ to implement teamworking, but at the same time suggesting what some of the necessary conditions might be for teamworking to be ‘successful’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cutcher-Gershenfeld, J. et al. (1994). “Japanese team-based work systems in North America: explaining the diversity”,California Management Review, 37, 42–64

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dale, B.G. and Cooper, C. (1992).Total Quality and Human Resources: An Executive Guide, Oxford, Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Delbridge, R. and Turnbull, P. (1992). Human resource maximisation: the management of labour under just-in-time manufacturing systems, in P. Blyton and P. Turnbull (eds)Reassessing Human Resource Management. London: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  4. Edwards, P.K., Collinson, M. and Rees, C. (1998). “The determinants of employee responses to TQM: six case studies”.Organization Studies. (forthcoming)

  5. Elger, T. (1990). “Technical Innovation and work reorganisation in British manufacturing in the 1980s: continuity, intensification or transformation?”Work, Employment and Society, (special issue, May) 4, 67–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Elger, T. and Fairbrother, P. (1992). Inflexible flexibility: a case study of modularization, in N. Gilbert, R. Burrows and A. Pollert (eds.)Fordism and Flexibility: Divisions and Change, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Garibaldo, F. (1997). “Knowledge, Competition and Employment”, paper presented atWork and Technology Consortium Conference on “Real Change in Organisations”, Bologna, 9–10 June.

  8. Geary, J. (1993). “Work practices: the structure of work, in P.K. Edwards (ed.)Industrial Relations, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Godfrey, G., Wilkinson, A., Marchington, M. and Dale, B. (1996). “Competitive advantage through people?: human resource policies in forms introducing total quality management”, paper presented atOpen University Business School Conference on “HRM: the Inside Story”, Milton Keynes, 1–2 April.

  10. Hill, S. and Peccei, R. (1996). “Checking out service: evaluating HRM and TQM in retailing”, paper presented atOpen University Business School Conference on “HRM: the Inside Story”, Milton Keynes, 1–2 April.

  11. Marchington, M., Wilkinson, A., Ackers, P. and Goodman, J. (1994). “Understanding the meaning of participation”,Human Relations, 47, 867–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. McArdle, L., Rowlinson, M., Proctor, S., Hassard, J. and Forrester, P. (1995). Total quality management and participation: employee empowerment or the enhancement of exploitation?, in A. Wilkinson and H. Willmott (eds)Making Quality Critical: New Perspectives on Organisational Change. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  13. O’Connell Davidson, J. (1990). “The road to functional flexibility: white collar work and employment relations in a privatised public utility”,The Sociological Review, 38(4), 689–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Oliver, N. and Wilkinson, B. (1992).The Japanization of British Industry (Second Edition), Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Parker, M. and Slaughter, J. (1993). “Should the labour movement buy TQM?”Journal of Organisational Change Management, 6(4), 43–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pollert, A. (1996). “Team work” on the assembly line: contradiction and the dynamics of union resilience, in P. Ackers, C. Smith and P. Smith (eds)The New Workplace and Trade Unionism, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rees, C. (1995). “Quality management and HRM in the service industry: some case study evidence,”Employee Relations, 17(3), 99–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rees, C. (1996). Employee Involvement in Quality Management Strategies: A Case Study Based Analysis, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Warwick.

  19. Rees, C., Scarbrough, H. and Terry, M. (1996). The People Management Implications of Leaner Ways of Working: The Warwick Report.IPD Issues in People Management No. 15, London: Institute of Personnel and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rosenthal, P., Hill, S. and Peccei, R. (1997). “Checking out service: evaluating excellence, HRM and TQM in retailing”,Work, Employment and Society.

  21. Scott, A. (1994).Willing Slaves? British Workers Under Human Resource Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sewell, G. and Wilkinson, B. (1992). “Someone to watch over me”: surveillance, discipline and the just-in-time labour process”,Sociology, 26, 271–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Storey, J. (ed.) (1994).New Wave Manufacturing Strategies: Organizational and Human Resource Management Dimensions, London: Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Thompson, P., Wallace, T., Flecker, J. and Ahlstrand, R. (1995). “In ain’t what you do, it’s the way that you do it: production organisation and skill utilisation in commercial vehicles”Work, Employment and Society, 9, 719–42.

    Google Scholar 

  25. TUC (1996). Partners for Progress: Next Steps for the New Unionism, London: Trades Union Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Waldman, D.A. (1994). “The contribution of total quality management to a theory of work performance”,Academy of Management Review, 19(3), 510–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Walton, R.E. (1985). “From control to commitment at the workplace”,Harvard Business Review, 63, 77–84.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Webb, J. (1996). “Vocabularies of motive and the “new” management”,Work, Employment and Society, 10, 251–72.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wickens, P. (1987).The Road to Nissan: Flexibility, Quality and Teamwork, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wilkinson, A., Godfrey, G. and Marchington, M. (1997) “Bouquets, brickbats and blinkers: total quality management and employee involvement in practice”,Organizational Studies, 18(5), 799–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Williamson, H. (1989). “Back to the melting pot?: re-thinking trade union perspectives on Japanese motor industry investment in Britain and Japanese-style industrial relations”, paper presented atConference of Socialist Economists.

  32. Winchester, D. and Bach, S. (1995). “The state: the public sector, in P. K. Edwards (ed.)Industrial Relations, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Womack, J., Jones, D.T. and Roos, D. (1990).The Machine that Changed the World, New York: Rawson.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wright, M. and Edwards, P.K. (1998). “Does teamworking work, and if so, why?: a case study in the aluminium industry”,Economic and Industrial Democracy. (forthcoming)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Rees.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rees, C. Assessing employee responses to teamworking and organisational change. AI & Soc 11, 218–230 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02812449

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02812449

Keywords

Navigation