Abstract
Mamardašvili did not develop a systematic philosophy that treats separately the various traditional disciplines of philosophy such as epistemology, logic, ethics, aesthetics etc. On the contrary, isolated from the direct influences of other currents of thought that might otherwise have given his own a different direction, Mamardašvili concentrated his attention on the very act of thought, the vitality of which had been undermined in philosophical understandings, including both Hegelian-Marxist attempts to situate the subject in history and re-appropriations of the Cartesian cogito. In this paper I will outline the most pertinent elements of Mamardašvili’s attempt to find a unified subject of knowledge and action and attempt to show how in his view consciousness and conscience are indissoluble.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
I would like to express my sincere thanks to Tapani Laine who generously shared both his acumen as a philosopher and his vast knowledge of the work of Mamardašvili in comments on a draft of this paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Regnier, D. Consciousness and Conscience: Mamardašvili on the Common Point of Departure for Epistemological and Moral Reflection. Stud East Eur Thought 58, 141–160 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-006-9000-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-006-9000-9