Abstract
Until recently, little attention has been paid in the school classroom to creationism and almost none to intelligent design. However, creationism and intelligent design appear to be on the increase and there are indications that there are more countries in which schools are becoming battlegrounds over them. I begin by examining whether creationism and intelligent design are controversial issues, drawing on Robert Dearden’s epistemic criterion of the controversial and more recent responses to and defences of this. I then examine whether the notion of ‘worldviews’ in the context of creationism is a useful one by considering the film March of the Penguins. I conclude that the ‘worldviews’ perspective on creationism is useful for two reasons: first, it indicates the difficulty of using the criterion of reason to decide whether an issue is controversial or not; secondly, it suggests that standard ways of addressing the diversity of student views in a science classroom may be inadequate. I close by examining the implications of this view for teaching in science lessons and elsewhere, for example in religious education lessons and at primary level where subject divisions cannot be made in so clear-cut a manner.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aerts, D., Apostel, L., De Moor, B., Hellemans, S., Maex, E., Van Belle, H., & Van der Veken, J. (1994). World views: From fragmentation to integration. Brussels: VUB Press. Available at http://www.vub.ac.be/CLEA/pub/books/worldviews.pdf
Baker, S. (2003). Bone of contention: Is evolution true? (3rd ed.). Rugby: Biblical Creation Society.
Barbour, I. G. (1990). Religion in an age of science: The Gifford lectures 1989–1991 (Vol. 1). London: SCM.
Behe, M. J. (1996). Darwin’s black box: The biochemical challenge to evolution. New York: Free Press.
Bennett, T. (2004). Pasts beyond memory: Evolution, museums, colonialism. London: Routledge.
Blancke, S., Hjermitslev, H. H., & Kjærgaard, P. C. (Eds.). (2014). Creationism in Europe. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Brickhouse, N. W., & Letts, W. J., IV. (1998). The problem of dogmatism in science education. In J. T. Sears & J. C. Carper (Eds.), Curriculum, religion, and public education: Conversations for an enlarging public square (pp. 221–230). New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Bridges, D. (1986). Dealing with controversy in the curriculum: A philosophical perspective. In J. J. Wellington (Ed.), Controversial issues in the curriculum (pp. 19–38). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
California Department of Education. (1990). Science framework for California public schools. Sacramento: California Department of Education.
Claire, H., & Holden, C. (Eds.). (2007). The challenge of teaching controversial issues. Trentham: Stoke-on-Trent.
DCSF. (2007). Guidance on creationism and intelligent design. Available at www.teachernet.gov.uk/docbank/index.cfm?id=11890
Dearden, R. F. (1984). Theory and practice in education. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Dembski, W. A. (1998). The design inference: Eliminating chance through small probabilities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Good, R. G., Trowbridge, J. E., Demastes, S. S., Wandersee, J. H., Hafner, M. S., & Cummins, C. L. (Eds.). (1992). Proceedings of the 1992 evolution education research conference. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University.
Graebsch, A., & Schiermeier, Q. (2006). Anti-evolutionists raise their profile in Europe. Nature, 444, 406–407.
Hand, M. (2008). What should we teach as controversial? A defense of the epistemic criterion. Educational Theory, 58, 213–228.
Helms, M. (n.d.). Movie review: March of the Penguins. http://www.christiananswers.net/spotlight/movies/2005/marchofthepenguins2005.html
Hermann, R. S. (2008). Evolution as a controversial issue: A review of instructional approaches. Science & Education, 17, 1011–1032.
Hess, D. E. (2009). Controversy in the classroom: The democratic power of discussion. New York: Routledge.
Interacademy Panel on International Issues. (2006). IAP statement on the teaching of evolution. Available at http://www.interacademies.net/File.aspx?id=6150
Jackson, R. (2004). Rethinking religious education and plurality: Issues in diversity and pedagogy. Abingdon: Routledge.
Johnson, P. E. (1999). The wedge: Breaking the modernist monopoly on science. Touchstone, 12(4), 18–24.
Jones, L., & Reiss, M. J. (Eds.). (2007). Teaching about scientific origins: Taking account of creationism. New York: Peter Lang.
Kitcher, P. (1983). Abusing science: The case against creationism. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Koperski, J. (2008). Two bad ways to attack intelligent design and two good ones. Zygon, 43, 433–449.
Laats, A., & Siegel, H. (2016). Teaching evolution in a creation nation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levinson, R. (2006). Towards a theoretical framework for teaching controversial socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1201–1224.
Long, D. (2011). Evolution and religion in American education: An ethnography. Dordrecht: Springer.
Marples, R. (Ed.). (1999). The aims of education. London: Routledge.
Matthews, M. (Ed.). (2009). Science, worldviews and education: Reprinted from the journal science & education. Dordrecht: Springer.
McLaughlin, T. (2003). Teaching controversial issues in citizenship education. In A. Lockyer, B. Crick, & J. Annette (Eds.), Education for democratic citizenship: Issues of theory and practice (pp. 149–160). Avebury: Aldershot.
Meyer, S. C., Nelson, P. A., Moneymaker, J., Minnich, S., & Seelke, R. (2009). Explore evolution: The arguments for and against neo-Darwinism. Melbourne: Hill House.
Midgley, M. (2007). Impact no. 15: Intelligent design theory and other ideological problems. London: Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain.
Miller, J. D., Scott, E. C., & Okamoto, S. (2006). Public acceptance of evolution. Science, 313, 765–766.
Moore, R. (2007). The history of the creationism/evolution controversy and likely future developments. In L. Jones & M. Reiss (Eds.), Teaching about scientific origins: Taking account of creationism (pp. 11–29). New York: Peter Lang.
Nagel, T. (2008). Public education and intelligent design. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 36, 187–205.
National Academy of Sciences and Institute of Medicine. (2008). Science, evolution, and creationism. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Parker, G. E. (2006). Creation: Facts of life – how real science reveals the hand of God. Los Angeles: New Leaf Press.
QCA. (2006). How can we answer questions about creation and origins? Learning from religion and science: Christianity, Hinduism, Islam and Humanism – Year 9. http://www.qcda.gov.uk/libraryAssets/media/qca-06-2728_y9_science_religion_master.pdf
Reiss, M. J. (2008a). Should science educators deal with the science/religion issue? Studies in Science Education, 44, 157–186.
Reiss, M. J. (2008b). Teaching evolution in a creationist environment: An approach based on worldviews, not misconceptions. School Science Review, 90(331), 49–56.
Reiss, M. J. (2009). Imagining the world: The significance of religious worldviews for science education. Science & Education, 18, 783–796.
Reiss, M. J. (2011). How should creationism and intelligent design be dealt with in the classroom? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45, 399–415.
Reiss, M. J., & White, J. (2013). An aims-based curriculum: The significance of human flourishing for schools. London: IOE Press.
Rosenblith, S., & Bindewald, B. (2014). Between mere tolerance and robust respect: Mutuality as a basis for civic education in pluralist democracies. Educational Theory, 64, 589–606.
Scott, M. (2007). Rethinking evolution in the museum. Abingdon: Routledge.
Selkirk, D. R., & Burows, F. J. (Eds.). (1987). Confronting creationism: Defending Darwin. Kensington: New South Wales University Press.
Smith, M. U., & Siegel, H. (2004). Knowing, believing, and understanding: What goals for science education? Science & Education, 13, 553–582.
Stradling, R. (1984). Controversial issues in the classroom. In R. Stradling, M. Noctor, & B. Baines (Eds.), Teaching controversial issues (pp. 1–12). London: Edward Arnold.
Trollinger, S. L., & Trollinger, W. V. (2016). Righting America at the creation museum. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
Wellington, J. (Ed.). (1986). Controversial issues in the curriculum. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Williams, J. D. (2008). Creationist teaching in school science: A UK perspective. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1, 87–95.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reiss, M.J. (2018). Creationism and Intelligent Design. In: Smeyers, P. (eds) International Handbook of Philosophy of Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72761-5_86
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72761-5_86
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72759-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72761-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)