Abstract
This study discusses the results of a survey of 1,800 articles published in American medical journals from 1985--1996. The study finds 9% of these articles reported research that uses only male subjects to examine medical conditions that affect both sexes; the ratio of research on female to male conditions among these articles was greater than 5:1; but 76.5% of the articles reported research that includes both male and female subjects. The study also discusses evidence that sex biases against women (and men) are decreasing. This study also offers some possible psychological, institutional, medical, and economic explanations of the sex biases in medical research published in American journals, and discusses some policy implications of sex biases in medical research. The study concludes by urging others to conduct more empirical research on sex biases in medical research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Dresser R. Wanted: single, white male for research.Hast. Cen. Rep, 1992 (Jan.–Feb.): 24–29.
Cotton P. Examples abound of gaps in medical knowledge. JAMA, 1990, 263: 1051–55.
Purvis A. A perilous gap. Time, Special Issue On Women, 1990 (Fall): 66–67.
Pinn V. Women's health research; prescribing change and addressing the issues. JAMA, 1992, 268: 1921–1922.
Arras J and Steinbock B, eds. Ethical Issues In Modern Medicine. 4th edn. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield, 1995.
Longino H. Gender and racial biases in research. In: Shrader-Frechette K, ed., Ethics of Scientific Research. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 1994: 139–151.
U.S. General Accounting Office. National Institutes of Health: problems in implementing policy on women in study populations. 18 June, 1990.
Kadard A. The sex-bias myth in medicine. The Atlantic Monthly, 1994 (August), 274: 66–70.
JAMA, April 12, 1995, 273: 1071–1156.
JAMA, 1985, 253: 1–1830; 1986, 255: 1–1472; 1987, 257: 1–1771; 1988, 259: 1– 2005; 1989, 261: 1–1457; 1990, 263: 1–2013; 1991, 265: 1117–2710; 1992, 268: 1– 1965; 1993, 269: 1–1296; 1994, 271: 1–636, 1129–1504; 1995, 273: 1–1156; 1996, 275: 1–890. N. Eng. J. Med., 1985, 312: 1–804; 1986, 314: 1–677; 1987, 316: 1–718; 1988, 318: 265–1076; 1989, 320: 1–676; 1990, 322, 1–864; 1991, 324: 1–830; 1002, 326: 1–736; 1993, 328: 1–820; 1994, 330: 1–819; 1995, 332: 1–976; 1181–1192, 1996: 334: 1–814. Ann. Int. Med., 1985, 102: 1–592; 1986, 104: 1–553; 1987, 106: 1–670; 1988, 108: 1–680; 1989. 110: 1–676; 1990, 112: 1–710; 1991, 114: 1–661; 1992, 116: 1–623; 1993: 118: 1–609; 1994, 120: 1–625; 1995, 122: 1–592, 1996: 1–458.
Fiebach N, Viscoli C, Hortwitz R. Differences between men and women in survival after myocardial infarction. JAMA, 1990, 263: 1092–1096.
Liao Y, Cooper R, Ghali J, Szocka A. Survival rates for coronary artery disease for black women compared with black men. JAMA, 1992, 268: 1867–1871.
Weisner C, Schmidt L. Gender disparities in treatment for alcohol problems. JAMA, 1992, 268: 1872–1876.
Pearson M et al. Differences in quality of care for hospitalized elderly men and women. JAMA, 1992, 268: 1883–1889.
Office of Research on Women's Health, National Institutes of Health. Recruitment and retention of women in clinical studies. NIH Publication No. 95-3756.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Resnik, D.B. Sex Biases in Subject Selection: A Survey of Articles Published in American Medical Journals. Theor Med Bioeth 20, 245–260 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009989920426
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009989920426