Jan Broersen
- Bartha, P. (2002). A Review of John Horty's Agency and Deontic Logic. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (2002.02.01). ndpr.icaap.org.]]Google Scholar
- Belnap, N., Perloff, M., and Xu, M. (2002). Facing the Future. Oxford University Press.]]Google Scholar
- Broersen, J. M., Dastani, M., Huang, Z., and van der Torre, L. W. N. (2002). Trust and Commitment in Dynamic Logic. In Shafazand, H. and Min Tjoa, A. (eds), Eurasia-ICT 2002: Information and Communication Technology, volume 2510 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 677-684. Springer.]] Google Scholar
- Castañeda, H.-N. (1981). The Paradoxes of Deontic Logic: The Simplest Solution to All of Them in One Fell Swoop. In Hilpinen, R. (ed.), New Studies in Deontic Logic: Norms, Actions and the Foundations of Ethics, 37-85. D. Reidel Publishing Company.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- Castañeda, H.-N. (1985). Aspectual Actions and Davidson's Theory of Events. In McLaughlin, B. P. and LePore, E. (eds.), Actions and Events: Perspectives on the Pholosophy of Donald Davidson, 294-310, Basil-Blackwell.]]Google Scholar
- Chellas, B. (1969). The Logical Form of Imparatives. Ph.D. thesis, Philosophy Department, Stanford University.]]Google Scholar
- Clarke, E. M., Emerson, E. A., and Sistla, A. P. (1986). Automatic Verification of Finite-State Concurrent Systems Using Temporal Logic Specifications. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 8(2).]] Google Scholar
- Czelakowski, J. (2003). John F. Horty, Agency and Deontic Logic. Erkenntnis 58(1): 116-126.]]Google Scholar
- Danielsson, S. (2002). A Review of John Horty's Agency and Deontic Logic. The Philosophical Quarterly, pp. 408-410.]]Google Scholar
- Emerson, E. A. (1990). Temporal and Modal Logic. In van Leeuwen, J. (ed.), Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, volume B: Formal Models and Semantics, Chapter 14, 996-1072. Elsevier Science.]] Google Scholar
- Feldman, F. (1986). Doing the Best We Can. D. Reidel Publishing Company.]]Google Scholar
- Gibbard, A. (1965). Rule-Utilitarianism: Merely an Illusionary Alternative? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 43: 211-220.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- Goldman, H. (1976). Dated Rightness and Moral Imperfection. The Philosophical Review 85: 449-487.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hanks, S. and Dermott, D.M. (1986). Default Reasoning, Nonmonotonic Logics, and the Frame Problem. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artifical Intelligence (AAAI86), 328-333, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.]]Google Scholar
- Humberstone, I. (1983). The Background of Circumstances. Pacific Philosophic Quarterly 64: 19-34.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jackson, F. and Pargetter, R. (1986). Oughts, Options and Actualism. Philosophical Review 99: 233-255.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kautz, H. (1986). The Logic of Persistence. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artifical Intelligence (AAAI86), 401-405, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.]]Google Scholar
- Lang, J., van der Torte, L. W. N., and Weydert, E. (2002). Utilitarian Desires. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 5(3): 329-363.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- McNamara, P. (2003). Agency and Deontic Logic by John Horty. Mind 112(448).]]Google Scholar
- Regan, D. (1980). Utilitarianism and Co-operation. Clarendon Press.]]Google Scholar
- Savage, L. (1954). The Foundations of Statistics. John Wiley and Sons.]]Google Scholar
- Sobel, J. H. (1968). Rule-utilitarianism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 46: 146-165.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thomason, R. (1981). Deontic Logic as Founded on Tense Logic. In Hilpinen, R. (ed.), New Studies in Deontic Logic, 165-176. D. Reidel Publishing Company.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- van der Torre, L. W. N. and Tan, Y. (1998). The Temporal Analysis of Chisholm's Paradox. In Proceedings of 15th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'98), 650-655.]] Google Scholar
- van der Torte, L. W. N. and Tan, Y. (1999a). Diagnosis and Decision Making in Normative Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law 7:51-67.]]Google ScholarDigital Library
- van der Torte, L. W. N. and Tan, Y. H. (1999b). Contrary-to-Duty Reasoning with Preference-Based Dyadic Obligations. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 27: 49-78.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- von Wright, G. H. (1951). Deontic Logic. Mind 60: 1-15.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wansing, H. (2003). A Review of John Horty's 'Agency and Deontic Logic'. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, to appear.]] Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Review of "Agency and deontic logic by John Horty" Oxford university press 2001
Recommendations
Stonebraker receives IEEE John von Neumann Medal
In December 2004, Michael Stonebraker was selected to receive the 2005 IEEE John von Neumann Medal for his "contributions to the design, implementation, and commercialization of relational and object-relational database systems." Mike is the first ...
An interview with Stanford University president John Hennessy
Stanford University President John Hennessy discusses his academic and industry experiences in Silicon Valley with UC Berkeley CS Professor David Patterson.
A Joint Review of "A History of Pi, by Petr Beckmann", St. Martins's Press, 1976, Barnes and Noble Books, 1989; "The Joy of Pi, by David Blatner", Walker & Co., 1997; "The Nothing That Is, by Robert Kaplan", Oxford University Press, 1999; "e: The Story of a Number, by Eli Maor", Princeton University Press, 1998; "An Imaginary Tale, by Paul Nahin", Princeton University Press, 1998; "Zero: The Biography of a Dangerous Idea, by Charles Seife", Viking Press, 2000.
We are in the midst of an onslaught of books devoted to particular numbers. In this article we will be concerned with several recent and not-so-recent books about pi, e, i, and 0; of the quantities in the famous equation e(pi)i + 1 = 0, only 1 does not ...
Comments