Abstract
This study tested whether situations defined as conflictual by the subject evoke more intense conflict, as measured by response time, than do situations defined as conflictual by the experimenter. The subjects were 22 undergraduate students, and paired adjectives were used as conflict trials. The results indicated that subject-defined conflicts are experienced as more intense than experimenter-defined conflict, and it is submitted that this can be interpreted most meaningfully within an interactional framework.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arkoff, A. Resolution of approach-approach and avoidance-avoidance conflicts. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1957, 55, 402–404.
Bowers, K. S. Situationism in psychology: An analysis and a critique. Psychological Review, 1973, 80, 307–336.
Hovland, C. I., & Sears, R. R. Experiments on motor conflict. I. Types of conflict and their modes of resolution. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1938, 23, 477–503.
Murray, E. J. Resolution of complex decisional conflicts as a function of degree of avoidance. Journal of Research in Personality, 1976, in press.
Ringuette, E. L. Mode of conflict resolution: A replication and extension. American Psychologist, 1965, 20, 548.
Ringuette, E. L. The stability of individual differences in behavior across experimental conflict situations. Journal of Research in Personality, 1976, 10, 177–182.
Schill, T. R. The effects of type and strength of induced conflict on conflict generalization and later preference for conflict stimuli. Journal of Personality, 1966, 34, 35–54.
Worell, L. Conflict experience and conflict to tolerance. American Psychologist, 1962, 17, 300–301.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ringuette, E.L., Schill, T.R. Subject-defined vs. experimenter-defined conflict. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 9, 181–182 (1977). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03336967
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03336967