Abstract
This paper deals with Heraclitus’ political thought. First, in discussing the conception of cosmic justice, it argues that it is a mistake to separate Heraclitus’ political thought from his cosmological thought. Second, the paper works out two basic principles of Heraclitean political thinking by offering a close analysis of fragment B 114 as well as related texts. According to Heraclitus, (1) there is a standard common and relevant to all human beings in the political realm, namely, the logos, and (2) ruling well is a matter of grasping the logos and using it as a guide in all things political. Finally, the paper tackles the notoriously difficult question of whether there are certain forms of political order towards which Heraclitean thought is more or less inclined. According to what may be called the traditional view, Heraclitus is seen as a supporter of an aristocratic political order, while according to what may be called the revisionist view, Heraclitus is classified as a supporter of a democratic political order. The paper concludes that while Heraclitean philosophy is compatible with a plethora of different forms of political order, including democratic ones, the two basic principles of Heraclitean politics that were distinguished above are more conducive to aristocratic forms of political order.
References
Almeida, Joseph. 2003. Justice as an Aspect of the Polis Idea in Solon’s Political Poems: A Reading of the Fragments in the Light of the Researches of New Classical Archeology. Brill: Leiden and Boston.10.1163/9789047402138Search in Google Scholar
Baldry, H.C. 1965. The Unity of Mankind in Greek Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511735851Search in Google Scholar
Barnes, Jonathan. 2000 [1982]. The Presocratic Philosophers. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203007372Search in Google Scholar
Battegazzore, Antonio. 1979. “Contributo alla nozione eraclitea di guistizia come limite (frr. B 11 e B 114 DK).” Sandalion 2: 5–17.Search in Google Scholar
Bernays, Jacob. 1869. Die Heraklitischen Briefe. Berlin: Wilhelm Hertz.Search in Google Scholar
Bise, Pierre. 1925. La Politique d’Héraclite d’Éphèse. Paris: Félix Alcan.Search in Google Scholar
Blass, Heinrich. 1958. Gott und die Gesetze. Ein Beitrag zur Frage des Naturrechts bei Heraklit (Fragment 114). Bonn: Bouvier.Search in Google Scholar
Boudouris, Konstantine. 1989. “Heraclitus and the Dialectical Conception of Politics.” In Ionian Philosophy. Ed. by K. Boudouris. 58–79. Athens: Kardamitsa.Search in Google Scholar
Cordero, Néstor-Luis. 1977. “La dinámica del polis in Heráclito.” Cudaernos de filosofía 17: 15–25.Search in Google Scholar
Diels, Hermann, and Walther Kranz. 1922. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Vol. 3. Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.Search in Google Scholar
Dilcher, Roman. 1995. Studies in Heraclitus. Hildesheim: Olms.Search in Google Scholar
Ellinger, Winfried. 1985. Ephesos: Geschichte Einer Weltstadt. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Search in Google Scholar
Evans, James. 1970. Heraclitus and Parmenides as Moral Philosophers. PhD thesis. Yale.Search in Google Scholar
Fränkel, Hermann. 1938. “A Thought Pattern in Heraclitus.” American Journal of Philology 59: 309–337.10.2307/291582Search in Google Scholar
Frère, Jean. 1994. “Les idées politiques d’Héraclite d’Éphèse.” Ktema 19: 231–238.10.3406/ktema.1994.2117Search in Google Scholar
Fronterotta, Francesco. 2013. Frammenti. Milan: BUR Classici greci e latini.Search in Google Scholar
Jaeger, Werner. 1936. The Theology of the Early Greek Philosophers. Oxford: Clarendon.Search in Google Scholar
Kahn, Charles. 1960. Anaximander and the Origins of Greek Cosmology. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/kahn90334Search in Google Scholar
Kahn, Charles. 1979. The Art and Thought of Heraclitus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511627392Search in Google Scholar
Käppel, Lutz. 2017. “Heraklits Kosmologie als Praxis von Modellierung.” In Heraklit im Kontext. Ed. by Enrica Fantino et al. 211–230. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110421323-011Search in Google Scholar
Kessides, Theocharis. 1983. “The Socio-Political Views of Heraclitus of Ephesus.” Philosophia 13–14: 92–108.Search in Google Scholar
Kirk, G.S. 2010 [1962]. The Cosmic Fragments. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kirk, G.S., et al. 2011 [1983]. The Presocratic Philosophers. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813375Search in Google Scholar
Kurzová, Helena. 2014. Interpretationen zu Heraklit. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachen und Literaturen der Universität Innsbruck.Search in Google Scholar
Laertius, Diogenes. 2005 [1931]. Lives of Eminent Philosophers. Vol. 2. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Marcovich, Miroslav. 1968. “Herakleitos.” Paulys Real-Enzyklopädie der Klassischen Altertumswissenschaft. Supplementband X: 246–320.Search in Google Scholar
Meier, Christian. 1983 [1980]. Die Entstehung des Politischen bei den Griechen. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.Search in Google Scholar
Menzel, Adolf. 1932. “Heraklits Rechtsphilosophie.” Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht 12: 177–220.Search in Google Scholar
Mourelatos, Alexander. 1965. “Heraclitus, Fr. 114.” American Journal of Philology 86: 258–266.10.2307/293533Search in Google Scholar
Noussia-Fantuzzi, Maria. 2010. Solon the Athenian, the Poetic Fragments. Leiden and Boston: Brill.10.1163/ej.9789004174788.i-580Search in Google Scholar
Ostwald, Martin. 1969. Nomos and the Beginnings of Athenian Democracy. Oxford: Clarendon.Search in Google Scholar
Pindar. 1997. Olympian Odes. Pythian Odes. Ed. by William Race. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.10.4159/DLCL.pindar-pythian_odes.1997Search in Google Scholar
Raaflaub, Kurt, et al. 2007. Origins of Democracy in Ancient Greece. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California.10.1525/california/9780520245624.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Robinson, T.M. 2003 [1991]. Heraclitus. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Search in Google Scholar
Senzasono, Luigi. 1996. “Eraclito e la legge.” Gerion 14: 53–75.Search in Google Scholar
Sider, David. 2013. “Heraclitus’ Ethics.” In Doctrine and Doxography: Studies on Heraclitus and Pythagoras. Ed. by D. Sider and D. Obbink, 321–334. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110331370.321Search in Google Scholar
Spanar, Julius. 1983. “Herakleitos von Ephesos Und Seine Politische Einstellung.” Listy Filologické 106: 146–150.Search in Google Scholar
Vlastos, Gregory. 1947. “Equality and Justice in Early Greek Cosmologies.” Classical Philology 42: 156–178.10.1086/363029Search in Google Scholar
Vlastos, Gregory. 1953. “Isonomia.” American Journal of Philology 74(4): 337–366.10.2307/292054Search in Google Scholar
West, Martin. 1971. Early Greek Philosophy and the Orient. Oxford: Clarendon.Search in Google Scholar
Wisniewski, Bohdan. 1973. “Héraclite sur la meilleure forme du gouvernement.” Rivista di studi classici 21: 177–180.Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter Inc., Boston/Berlin
