Skip to main content
Log in

Openly Carrying Handguns for Self-Defense

  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The journal articles in the extant philosophical literature which argue in favor of carrying handguns for self-defense tend to assume that these weapons will be concealed and make no mention of carrying them openly. This paper aims to show that, since open-carry can be more effective for self-defense than concealed-carry, any argument for a moral right to carry a handgun for self-defense which relies on a claim of their effectiveness and which assumes concealed-carry, entails the moral right to carry them openly in public.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. One author who does mention open-carry, says only that his “discussion does not bear directly, it seems, on the question of carrying a gun outside of one’s home concealed, as opposed to openly.” Hall (2006: 308).

  2. Hsiao (2017: 660), citing Wheeler (1997), et al. at Hsiao (2017: 660 n. 4). Since Hsiao uses both “guns” and “firearms” to refer to handguns, whenever I quote him and he has used either of these terms I have changed them to “handguns” for consistency. Hsiao (2017: 659 n. 1).

  3. Hsiao (2017: 660); indeed, he thinks “the right to own a [hand]gun and the right to carry a [hand]gun are really just distinct parts of a single right” (2017: 661 n. 8).

  4. State v. Reid 1 Alabama 612, 619, 621 (1840), quoted in Meltzer (2014: 1519, 1514).

  5. “[T]he federal definition of a ‘mass killings’ [is] ‘3 or more killings in a single incident.’” Schwelt (2016: 3), quoting the Investigative Assistance for Violent Crimes Act of 2012, 28 USC 530C(b)(1)(M)(i). “The FBI does not include the shooter in the totals of killed and wounded.” Schwelt (2016: 3, n. 8)

  6. Alternatively, the concern might be that the person open-carrying will be targeted by the criminal precisely because the criminal wants to take the handgun. Like uniformed law enforcement officers, who regularly open-carry in close proximity to criminals and criminal suspects, those who intend to open-carry (as well as those who intend to concealed-carry) should use a retention holster and include weapon retention in their firearms training. See Harbison 2009.

  7. For discussion of the empirical evidence, as well as the intellectual history of rational choice theory and deterrence theory (in which Jeremy Bentham’s philosophy figures prominently), see Paternoster 2010.

  8. Thanks to J. Angelo Corlett and to an anonymous reviewer of this journal for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this article.

References

  • Bernstein, C., Hsiao, T., & Palumbo, M. (2015). The moral right to keep and bear firearms. Public Affairs Quarterly, 29(4), 345–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braga, A. A. (2007). Firearms: guns and the gun culture. In J. R. Greene (Ed.), The encyclopedia of police science (Vol. 1 of 2, 3rd ed., pp. 535–540). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, J. (2016). Texas’ new open-carry law unpopular among some gun owners. https://www.npr.org/2016/01/15/463184909/texas-new-open-carry-law-unpopular-among-some-gun-owners. Accessed 26 December 2017.

  • Hall, T. (2006). Is there a right to bear arms? Public Affairs Quarterly, 20(4), 293–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbison, J. (2009). Real world weapon retention, Police: the law enforcement magazine.” https://www.policemag.com/channel/weapons/articles/2009/04/real-world-weapon-retention.aspx. Accessed 17 March 2018.

  • Hsiao, T. (2017). The ethics of ‘gun-free zones.’ Philosophia, 45(2), 659–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huemer, M. (2003). Is there a right to own a gun? Social Theory and Practice, 29(2), 297–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lott Jr., J. R. (2000). More guns, less crime: understanding crime and gun-control laws (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzer, J. (2014). Open carry for all: Heller and our nineteenth-century second amendment. The Yale Law Journal, 123(5), 1486–1530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paternoster, R. (2010). How much do we really know about criminal deterrence? The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 100(3), 765–823.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwelt, K. W. (2016). Active shooter incidents in the United States in 2014 and 2015, Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.

  • Steele, R. (2016). How offenders make decisions: evidence of rationality. British Journal of Community Justice, 13(3), 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, S. (1997). Self-defense: rights and coerced risk-acceptance. Public Affairs Quarterly, 11(4), 431–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. D. and Rossi, P. H. (1985). The armed criminal in America: A survey of incarcerated felons, U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/Photocopy/97099NCJRS.pdf. Accessed 9 January 2018.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodney C. Roberts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roberts, R.C. Openly Carrying Handguns for Self-Defense. Philosophia 47, 499–503 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-018-9973-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-018-9973-x

Keywords

Navigation