Abstract
This chapter considers whether the approach of the justice system to women who manifest their faith through the wearing of the niqab (face veil) serves to marginalise this group. Court decisions in cases where women have wished to retain their niqab whilst giving evidence have often recognised the importance of the religious right but then treated it as being subservient to the right of the opposing party to a fair trial. This chapter will argue that this argument is misplaced as the niqab does not obstruct the ability of the court to assess the credibility of the witness. Whilst judges deciding on such cases have limited discretion to interfere with existing practices, governments do, and there should be clear guidance to ensure that religious minorities are not deterred from asserting their legal rights in the courts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahmed v Ahad (Deceased). (2011).
BBC. (2006). Lawyers ‘Can Wear Veils in Court’. [Online]. Retrieved March 9, 2022, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6134804.stm
BBC. (2015). Top Judge Calls for Respect for Veiled Women in Court. [Online]. Retrieved March 9, 2022, from https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-32347761
BBC. (2018). Boris Johnson Faces Criticism Over Burka ‘Letter-Box’ Jibe. [Online]. Retrieved March 18, 2022, from https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-45083275
Bingham, L. (2011). The Business of Judging. Oxford University Press.
Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. (2015). General Recommendation on Women’s Access to Justice. s.l.:s.n.
Council of Europe. (1952). The European Convention on Human Rights. Directorate of Information.
Criminal Justice and Public Order Act. (1994). s.l.:s.n.
de Jong, J., & Rizvi, G. (2008). The Castle and the Village; The Many Faces of Limited Access. In J. de Jong & G. Rizvi (Eds.), The State of Access:Success and Failure of Democracies to Create Equal Opportunities. Brookings Institution Press.
Evening Standard. (2014). Top Judge Calls for Rules Which Force Women to Take Off Veils When Giving Evidence in Court. [Online]. Retrieved March 9, 2022, from https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/top-judge-calls-for-rules-which-force-women-to-take-off-veils-when-giving-evidence-in-court-9920224.html
Fecher, N., & Watt, D. (2011). Speaking Under Cover: The Effect of Face-concealing Garments on Spectral Properties of Fricatives. Hong Kong, Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences.
Gardner, C. (2013). Even in a Niqab a Defendant Must Be Heard. [Online]. Retrieved March 9, 2022, from https://www.headoflegal.com/2013/09/19/even-in-a-niqab-the-defendant-must-be-heard/
Gibb, F. (2013). Ban the Veil in Courts, Say Barristers. The Times, 2 November.
Hale, B. (2019). Supreme Court. [Online]. Retrieved March 23, 2022, from https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-190228.pdf
Hewson, B. (2013). Veils in Court—Should They Be Allowed? Legal Week, 19 September.
Human Rights Act. (1998). Human Rights Act. s.l.:s.n.
Judicial College. (2021). Equal Treatment Benchbook. s.l.:s.n.
Judiciary. (2013a). [Online]. Retrieved March 9, 2022, from https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/JCO/Documents/lcj-press-conference-2013.pdf
Judiciary. (2013b). The Queen v D. [Online]. Retrieved March 18, 2022, from https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/JCO/Documents/Judgments/The+Queen+-v-+D+(R).pdf
Judiciary. (2015). Transcript of the Lord Chief Justice’s Annual Press Conference 2015. [Online]. Retrieved March 9, 2022, from https://www.judiciary.uk/announcements/transcript-of-the-lord-chief-justices-annual-press-conference-2015/
Judicial Communications Office. (2008). News Release 29/06. Guidance on the wearing of veils by representatives in courts and tribunals.
Kadri, S. (2005). The Trial: A History from Socrates to OJ Simpson (1st ed.). Harper Collins.
Kelly, L., Temkin, J., & Griffiths, S. (2006). Section 41: An Evaluation of New Legislation Limiting Sexual History Evidence in Rape Trials. Home Office.
Leach, A.-M., et al. (2016). Less Is More? Detecting Lies in Veiled Witnesses. Law and Human Behavior, 40(4), 401–410.
Mill, J. (1859). On Liberty.
Ministry of Justice. (2022). Delivering Justice for Victims: A Consultation on Improving Victims’ Experiences of the Justice System. [Online]. Retrieved March 18, 2022, from https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/delivering-justice-for-victims-a-consultation-on-improving-victims-experiences-of-the-justice-system/
Nussbaum, M. C. (2008). Liberty of Conscience. In Defense of America’s Tradition of Religious Equality. Basic Books.
Onassis v Vergottis. (1968). Lloyds Report.
Police v Razmajoo. (2005).
R v Lubemeba. (2014).
R v N.S. (2012).
Robson, J. (2016a). The Niqaab and the Myth of Pinocchio’s Nose: Is the Niqaab an Impediment to Fact Finding in an Adversarial Trial? An Analysis of R v D. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, 5(2), 319–343.
Robson, J. (2016b). The Veiled Lodger—A Reflection on the Status of R v D. Nottingham Law Journal, 105–111.
Schwartzbaum, A. (2010). Comment: The Niqab in the Courtroom: Protecting Free Exercise of Religion in a Post-Smith World. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1533. (cited in text)
Sheurich, J. J., & Young, M. D. (1991). The Racial Crisis in American Higher Education. State University of New York.
SL v MJ. (2006).
Supreme Court. (2015). Response to Media Coverage of Lord Neuberger’s Lecture “Fairness in the Courts”. [Online]. Retrieved March 9, 2022, from https://www.supremecourt.uk/news/response-to-media-coverage-of-lord-neubergers-lecture-fairness-in-the-courts.html
Tell MAMA. (2018). Interim Report 2018: Gendered Anti-Muslim Hatred and Islamophobia, Street Based Aggression in Cases Reported to Tell MAMA Is Alarming. [Online]. Retrieved March 18, 2022, from https://tellmamauk.org/gendered-anti-muslim-hatred-and-islamophobia-street-based-aggression-in-cases-reported-to-tell-mama-is-alarming/
Tell MAMA. (2019). Tell Mama Annual Report 2018. [Online]. Retrieved March 18, 2022, from https://tellmamauk.org/tell-mama-annual-report-2018-_-normalising-hate/
The Daily Mail. (2013). You Must Take Off Your Veil: Judge Rules that Muslim Defendant Can Wear Niqab During Trial But NOT When Giving Evidence. [Online]. Retrieved March 9, 2013, from https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2421893/Judge-Peter-Murphy-rules-Muslim-woman-REMOVE-face-veil-evidence.html
The Independent. (2016). Cameron Will Back UK Muslim Veil Ban. [Online]. Retrieved March 18, 2022, from https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/cameron-will-back-uk-muslim-veil-bans-as-he-announces-new-measures-to-tackle-segregation-a6820491.html
The Independent. (2017). Theresa May Backs Muslim Women’s Right to Wear the Veil. [Online]. Retrieved March 18, 2022, from https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/theresa-may-muslim-hijab-ban-pmqs-a7557126.html
The Sun. (2013). Unveiled. [Online]. Retrieved March 9, 2022, from https://www.thesun.co.uk/archives/news/1017838/unveiled/
The Telegraph. (2013). David Cameron Supports Muslim Veil Ban in Schools and Courts. [Online]. Retrieved March 9, 2022, from https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/david-cameron/10342501/David-Cameron-supports-Muslim-veil-ban-in-schools-and-courts.html
The Times. (2016). Letter to the Times. [Online].
Vrij, A., & Hartwig, M. (2021). Deception and Lie Detection in the Courtroom: The Effect of Defendants Wearing Medical Face Masks. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 10(3).
Walker, J. (2011). “I will not take off my clothes” the Application of International Obligations and the Wearing of the Niqab in Australian Court. s.n.
Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act s41 c23. (1999). s.l.:s.n.
Zempi, I. (2020). Veiled Muslim Women’s Responses to Experiences of Gendered Islamophobia in the UK. International Review of Victimology, 26(1), 96–111.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Robson, J. (2024). Removal of the Niqab in Court: A Structural Barrier to Equality. In: Easat-Daas, A., Zempi, I. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Gendered Islamophobia. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52022-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52022-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-52021-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-52022-8
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)