Teed Rockwell
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
I propose a semi-eliminative reduction of Fodor's concept of module to the concept of attractor basin which is used in Cognitive Dynamic Systems Theory (DST). I show how attractor basins perform the same explanatory function as modules in several DST based research program. Attractor basins in some organic dynamic systems have even been able to perform cognitive functions which are equivalent to the If/Then/Else loop in the computer language LISP. I suggest directions for future research programs which could find similar equivalencies between organic dynamic systems and other cognitive functions. This type of research could help us discover how (and/or if) it is possible to use Dynamic Systems Theory to more accurately model the cognitive functions that are now being modeled by subroutines in Symbolic AI computer models. If such a reduction of subroutines to basins of attraction is possible, it could free AI from the limitations that prompted Fodor to say that it was impossible to model certain higher level cognitive functions.
- Bechtel, W. (1998). 'Representations and Cognitive Explanations: Assessing the Dynamieist Challenge in Cognitive Science'. Cognitive Science 22. pp. 295-318. Also available at http: www.artsci.wustl.edu/~bill/REPRESENT.htmlGoogle Scholar
Cross Ref
- Bickle, J. (1998). Psychoneural Reduction: the New Wave , Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Churchland, P. (1989). A Neurocomputational Perspective , Cambridge MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
- Clark, P. (1999). 'Startup Implements Silicon Neural: Net in Learning Processor' in EE Times , Also available at 〈http://www.eetimes.com/storyOEG19990914S0033〉Google Scholar
- Dennett, D. (1991). Consciousness Explained , Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Dreyfus, H.L. (1972-1994). What Computers Still Can't Do , Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
- Dreyfus, H.L. (1996). 'The Current Relevance of Merleau-Ponty's Phenomenology of Embodiment'. http://hci.stanford.edu/cs378/reading_dreyfusembodiment.htmGoogle Scholar
- Dewey (1896). 'The Reflex Arc Concept in Psychology'. http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Dewey reflex.htmGoogle Scholar
- Eliasmith, C. (1996). 'The Third Contender: A Critical Examination of the Dynamicist Theory of Cognition'. Philosophical Psychology , 9(4), pp. 441-463. Reprinted in P. Thagard (ed) (1998). Mind Readings: Introductory Selections in Cognitive Science . MIT Press.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Finger. S., ed. (1978). Recovery from Brain Damage . New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
- Fodor, J. (1983). The Modularity of Mind . Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Fodor, J. (1985). ' Precis of The Modularity of Mind ' published in Minds Brains and Computers (2000) Edited by Cummins and Cummins. Blackwell Publishers. London. first published in Behavior and Brain Sciences , 8, 1985.Google Scholar
- Fodor, J. and Pylyshyn Z. (1988). 'Connectionism and Cognitive Architecture: A Critical Analysis'. in Haugeland 1997.Google Scholar
- Freeman, W. (2000). How Brains Make up their Minds . New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Haugeland, J., ed. (1985). Artificial Intelligence: The Very Idea , Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
- Haugeland, J. ed. (1997) Mind Design II . Cambridge. MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
- Kandel. F., Schwartz. J., and Jessel. T. (2000). Priciples of Neuroscience . New York, NY: Mc Graw-Hill Appleton & Lange.Google Scholar
- Kelso. J.A. Scott (1995). Dynamic Patterns , Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Laurence and Stein (1978) 'Recovery after Brain Damage and the Concept of Localization of Function'. in Finger (1978).Google Scholar
- MacKay, W.A. (1980) 'The Motor Program: Back to the Computer'. in Trends in Neurosciences April 1980, pp. 97-100.Google Scholar
- McCarthy, J. (1960). Recursive Functions of Symbolic Expressions and Their Computation by Machine. Part I Communications of the ACM (Association for Computing Machinery). April. Google Scholar
- Minsky (1985). 'The Society of Mind'. New York, Simon and Schuster. Google Scholar
- Port, R.F. and Van Gelder, T. eds. (1995). Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition . Cambridge. MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
- Ramsey, Stich and Garon (1991). 'Connectionism, Eliminativism and the Future of Folk Psychology'. in S. Stich, D. Rumelhart and W. Ramsey. ed. Philosophy and Connectionist Theory . Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Also reprinted in Raugeland, J. ed. (1997).Google Scholar
- Rockwell, W. T. (1995) 'Can Reductionism be Eliminated?'. presented at the American Philosophy Association Meeting (Pacific division) in San Francisco (with commentary by John Bicklet, rewirtten as 'Beyond Eliminative Materialism'. http://www.california.com /~memf/beyondem.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Stehouwer, D.J. and Farel, P.B. (1983). 'Development of Hindlimb Locomotor Activity in the Bullforg'. Development Psychobiology 17, pp. 217-232.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Taylor, R.C. (1978). 'Why Change Gaits? Recruitment of Muscles and Muscle Fibers as a Function of Speed and Gait'. American Zoologist 18, 153-161.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Thelen, E. and Smith, L. (1994). 'A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action'. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Unal, W.R. (2001). The New Phrenology , Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Van Gelder, T. (1991). 'What is the 'D' in 'PDP'? An Overview of the Concept of Distribution', in S. Stich, D. Rumelhart and W. Ramsey. eds., Philosophy and Connectionist Theory Hiillsdale NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Van Gelder, T. (1995) 'What Might Cognition Be If Not Computation?' Journal of Philosophy 92. 345-381. Reprinted as: The Dynamical Alternative. in Johnson. D. & Erneling. C. eds., Reassessing the Cognitive Revolution: Alternative Futures , Oxford: Oxford University Press: 1996. Google ScholarCross Ref
- Van Gelder, T. (1996). "The Dynamical Hypothesis in Cognitive Science" and "Authors Response" Behavior and Brain Sciences .Google Scholar
- Watson, S.J. and Beckoff, A. (1990). 'A Kinematic Analysis of Hindlimb Mobility in 9- and 10-day Old Chick Embryos'. Journal of Neurobiology 21. pp. 651-660.Google ScholarCross Ref
Comments