Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Confucianism between Tradition and Modernity, Religion, and Secularization: Questions to Tu Weiming

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The article discusses central assumptions of Tu Weiming’s program of overcoming the “enlightenment mentality” and throws a critical light on his conceptions of religious or spiritual Confucianism, of a Confucian modernity, and of the “multiple modernities” theory in general. It defends a unitary rather than multiple concept of modernity in terms of the realization of a morally controlled “principle of free subjectivity” and tries to show how Confucianism, understood as a secular ethics, could contribute to this goal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apel, Karl-Otto. 1988. Diskurs und Verantwortung (Discourse and Responsibility). Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Daniel A., David Brown, and Kanishka Jayasuriya, eds. 1995. Towards Illiberal Democracy in Pacific Asia. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, Robert M. 1983. “Cultural Identity and Asian Modernization.” In Cultural Identity and Modernization in Asian Countries: Proceedings of Kokugakuin University Centennial Symposium. Institute for Japanese Culture and Classics, Kokugakuin University.

  • Berger, Peter L. 1988. “An East Asian Development Model?” In In Search of an East Asian Development Model. Ed. by P. L. Berger and Hsin-Huang Michael Hsiao. New Brunswick and Oxford: Transaction.

  • Eisenstadt, S. N. 2000. “Multiple Modernities.” In Daedalus 129/1: 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fingarette, Herbert. 1972. Confucius. The Secular as the Sacred. New York: Harper Torchbook

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermans, Jürgen. 1985. Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne (The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity). Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1992. Texte und Kontexte. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1998. “Konzeptionen der Moderne. Ein Rückblick auf zwei Traditionen” (Conceptions of Modernity: A look back on two traditions). In Habermas, Die postnationale Konstellation (The Post-National Constellation). Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G.W.F. 1970. Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts (Philosophy of Law). Werke in zwanzig Bänden, 7. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Yong. 2007. “Confucian Theology: Three Models.” Religion Compass 1.4: 455–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, Herman. 1979. World Economic Development. Boulder: Westview press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küng, Hans, and Karl J. Kuschel. 1993. Erklärung zum Weltethos. Die Deklaration des Parlaments der Weltreligionen (The Declaration of the Parliament of World Religions). München, Zürich: Piper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Ming-huei 李明輝. 1990. Confucianism and Kant 儒家與康德. Taipei 臺北: Lianjing 聯經.

  • _____. 1991. Confucianism and Modern Consciousness 儒學與現代意識. Taipei 臺北: Wenjin 文津.

  • _____. 1994. The Self Transformation of Contemporary Confucianism 當代儒學之自我轉化. Taipei 臺北: Academia Sinica 中央研究院.

  • _____. 2001. A Reinterpretation of Mencius 孟子重探. Taipei 臺北: Lianjing 聯經.

  • _____. 2006. “Xu Fuguan on Confucianism and Religion” 徐复观论儒家与宗教. In Renwen luncong 人文论丛.

  • Li, Ruiquan 李瑞全. 1999. Confucian Bioethics 儒家生命倫理學. Taipei 臺北: Ehu 鵝湖.

  • Lunyu. 1972. Harvard-Yenching Institute Sinological Index Series. A Concordance to the Analects. Reprint Taipei.

  • MacFarquhar, Roderick. 1980. “The Post-Confucian Challenge.” The Economist Feb. 9, 1980: 67–72.

  • Makeham, John. 2008. Lost Soul: “Confucianism” in Contemporary Chinese Academic Scene Discourse. Cambridge: Harvard University Asian Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mengzi. 1980. Harvard-Yenching Sinological Index Series, A Concordance to Meng Tzu. Reprint Taipei.

  • Mou, Zongsan. 1961. The Way of Politics and the Way of Government 政道與治道. Taipei 臺北: Guangwen Shuju 廣文書局.

  • Parsons, Talcott. 1951. The Social System. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qiu, Renzong, ed. 2004. Bioethics: Asian Perspectives. A Quest for Moral Difference. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 2006. “Cloning Issues in China.” In Cross-Cultural Issues in Bioethics: The Example of Human Cloning. Ed. by Heiner Roetz. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roetz, Heiner. 1993. Confucian Ethics of the Axial Age. A Reconstruction of the Breakthrough towards Postconventional Thinking. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 2001. “Europa und die asiatischen Werte” (Europe and the Asian Values). In Werte im 21. Jahrhundert. Ed. by Walter Schweidler. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 2002. “Tu Wei-ming als Anwalt und Kritiker der Aufklärung” (Tu Weiming as Advocate and Critic of the Enlightenment). In In All Sincerity. Festschrift für Monika Übelhör. Ed. by Denise Gimpel et. al. Hamburg: Hamburger Sinologische Schriften 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 2002a. “Albert Schweitzer über das chinesische Denken. Eine sinologische Anmerkung” (Albert Schweitzer on Chinese Thought. A Sinological Note). In Albert Schweitzer, Geschichte des chinesischen Denkens, Werke aus dem Nachlass (History of Chinese Thought. Works From the Literary Bequest). München: Beck. (Abbreviated English translation in Journal of Ecumenical Studies XL.1–2 [2003], and abbreviated Chinese translation in Contemporary Confucianism and Western Culture 當代儒學與西方文化: 會通與轉化. Ed. by Lee Minghui 李明輝 and Lin Weijie 林維杰. Tapei: Academia Sinica [2007])

  • _____. 2005. “Normativity and History in Warring States Thought. The Shift towards the Anthropological Paradigm.” In Historical Truth, Historical Criticism, and Ideology. Chinese Historiography and Historical Culture from a New Comparative Perspective. Ed. by Helwig Schmidt-Glintzer, Achim Mittag and Jörn Rüsen. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 2006. “China—eine andere Moderne?” (China—Another Modernity?). In Die Vielfalt und die Einheit der Moderne (The multiplicity and unity of modernity). Ed. by Thomas Schwinn. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 2008. “Mengzi’s Political Ethics and the Question of Its Modern Relevance.” In The Book of Mencius and Its Reception in China and Beyond. Ed. by Huang Chun-chieh, Gregor Paul, and Heiner Roetz. Wiesbaden: Harrasowitz.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 2008a. “On Nature and Culture in Zhou China.” In Concepts of Nature in Traditional China: Comparative Approaches. Ed. by Günter Dux and Hans Jochen Vogel. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, H. H. 1956. Prophecy and Religion in Ancient China and Israel. London: University of London, Athlone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles. 1999. “Two Theories of Modernity.” In Public Culture 11/1: 153–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, Yenzen. 2008. “Selfhood and Fiduciary Community: A Smithian Reading of Tu Weiming’s Confucian Humanism.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy VII.4 (in this issue).

  • Tu, Weiming. 1989. Centrality and Commonality, Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1990. “Der industrielle Aufstieg Ostasiens aus konfuzianischer Sicht” (The industrial ascendancy of East Asia from a Confucian perspective). In Konfuzianismus und die Modernisierung Chinas (Confucianism and the modernization of China). Ed. by Silke Krieger and Rolf Trauzettel. Mainz: v. Hase & Köhler.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1993. Way, Learning and Politics. Essays on the Confucian. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1994. “Beyond the Enlightenment Mentality.” In Worldviews and Ecology: Religion, Philosophy, and The Environment. Ed. by M. E. Tucker and J. A. Grimm. Maryknoll: Orbis Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 1996. “Family, Nation, and the World: The Global Ethic as a Modern Confucian Quest.” 3rd Reischauer Lecture, Fairbank Center for East Asian Research, Harvard University, April 1996. Http://tuweiming.com/lecture.3.html.

  • _____. 1998. “A Confucian perspective on Human Rights.” Harvard International Review. 20.3: 44–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 2000. “Implications of the Rise of ‘Confucian’ East Asia.” Daedalus 129/1: 195–218

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 2001. “The Ecological Turn in New Confucian Humanism.” Daedalus 130/4: 243–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Yangming 王陽明. 1976. Complete Works of W ang Yangming 王陽明全集. Taipei 臺北: Zhengzhong 正中.

  • Weber, Max. 1972. Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie I (Collected Essay on the Sociology of Religion). Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weede, Erich. 1996. “Die Entwicklung Ostasiens als kapitalistische Herausforderung für die westlichen Demokratien” (The development of East Asia as a capitalistic challenge to the Western democracies). In Vor dem pazifischen Jahrhundert? (Before the pacific century?). Ed. by Adolf Kimmel. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

  • Weiss, Johannes. 1986. “Wiederverzauberung der Welt? Bemerkungen zur Wiederkehr der Romantik in der gegenwärtigen Kulturkritik” (Reenchantment of the world? Remarks on the return of Romanticism in contemporary cultural criticism). In Kultur und Gesellschaft, Sonderheft 27.

  • Xu, Fuguan 徐復觀. 1963. A History of Chinese Conceptions of Human Nature: The Pre-Qin Period 中國人性論史: 先秦篇. Taizhong 臺中: Donghai Daxue 東海大學.

  • Zhang, Zhidong 張之洞. 1959. On Learning 勸學篇. In A Sourcebook of Chinese Philosophy: The Period of Qing Dynasty 中國哲學史資料選集 情代之部. Ed. by Zhongguo Shehui Kexueyuan Zhexue Yanjiusuo 中國社會科學院哲學研究所. Beijing 北京: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ruhr University, 44780, Bochüm, Germany

    Heiner Roetz

Authors
  1. Heiner Roetz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heiner Roetz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roetz, H. Confucianism between Tradition and Modernity, Religion, and Secularization: Questions to Tu Weiming. Dao 7, 367–380 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-008-9086-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-008-9086-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation