Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Emotionen und ethische Beurteilung technologischer Risiken

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Technikethik

  • 6850 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Technologische Entwicklungen, zum Beispiel in der Energieerzeugung, Robotik und Biotechnologie, vollziehen sich in einem schnellen Tempo und können tiefgreifende Auswirkungen auf die Gesellschaft haben, indem sie unsere Lebensweise auf oft unvorhersehbare Weise verändern und unvorhergesehene Risiken hervorrufen. Wie von Risikoethikern argumentiert wurde, erfordert dies ethische Überlegungen und demokratische Deliberation (z. B. Shrader-Frechette 1991, Hansson 2004, Asveld/Roeser 2009, Roeser et al. 2012). Debatten über technologische Risiken sind jedoch häufig hitzig und münden in Pattsituationen. Dies ist auf die Komplexitäten dieser Debatten zurückzuführen, da sie wissenschaftliche Informationen und Unsicherheiten beinhalten sowie ethische Überlegungen und emotionale Reaktionen hervorrufen (Slovic 2010, Roeser 2010a, s. Kap. 41, 4 und 29).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Asveld, Lotte/Roeser, Sabine (Hg.): The Ethics of Technological Risk, London 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, Baruch/Lichtenstein, Sara/Slovic, Paul/Derby, Stephen L./Keeney, Ralph L.: Acceptable Risk. Cambridge 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frijda, Nico H.: The Emotions. Cambridge 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, Jonathan: The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. In: Psychological Review, 108/4 (2001), 814–833.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, Jonathan: The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, Sven Ove: Philosophical perspectives on risk. In: Techné 8 (2004), 10–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillerbrand, Rafaela/Peterson Martin: Nuclear power is neither right nor wrong: the case for a tertium datur in the ethics of technology. Science and Engineering Ethics. 20/2 (2014), 583–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahan, Dan: Cultural Cognition as a Conception of the Cultural Theory of Risk. In:Roeser, Sabine/Hillerbrand, Rafaela/Peterson, Martin/Sandin, Per (Hg.): Handbook of Risk Theory. Dordrecht 2012, 725–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel: Thinking Fast and Slow. New York 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingston, Rebecca: Public Passion: Rethinking the Grounds for Political Justice. Montreal/Kingston 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Künneke, Rolf/Mehos, Donna C./Hillerbrand, Rafaela/Hemmes, Kas: Understanding values embedded in offshore wind energy systems: Toward a purposeful institutional and technological design. In: Environmental Science & Policy 53/B (2015), 118–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krimsky, Sheldon/Golding, Dominic: Social theories of Risk. Westport 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiserowitz, Anthony: Climate Change Risk Perception And Policy Preferences: The Role Of Affect, Imagery, And Values. In: Climatic Change 77 (2006), 45–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha: Upheavals of Thought. Cambridge 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichle, Ingeborg: Art in the Age of Technoscience: Genetic Engineering, Robotics, and Artificial Life in Contemporary Art. Vienna/New York 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeser, Sabine (Hg.): Emotions and Risky Technologies. Dordrecht 2010a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeser, Sabine: Emotional Reflection about Risks. In: Sabine Roeser (Hg.): Emotions and Risky Technologies. Dordrecht 2010b, 231–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeser, Sabine: Moral Emotions and Intuitions. Basingstoke 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeser, Sabine: Risk Communication, Public Engagement, and Climate Change: A Role for Emotions. In: Risk Analysis 32 (2012), 1033–1040.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeser, Sabine: Risk, Technology, and Moral Emotions. Routledge 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabine Roeser (2019), »De kunst van maatschappelijk verantwoorde technologieontwikkeling«, in Mark Geels en Tim van Opijnen (eds.), Joris Luyendijk presenteert: Hoop – Hoe hou jij hoop? 100 wetenschappers, kunstenaars en ondernemers vertellen wat hun hoop geeft, Amsterdam: Maven Publishing B.V., pp. 220–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabine Roeser, Rafaela Hillerbrand, Martin Peterson and Per Sandin (eds.) (2012), Handbook of Risk Theory: Epistemology, Decision Theory, Ethics, and Social Implications of Risk, Springer (2 volumes, 1188pp)

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeser, Sabine/Pesch, Udo: An Emotional Deliberation Approach to Risk. In: Science, Technology and Human Values 41 (2016), 274–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeser, Sabine/Alfano, Veronica/Nevejan, Caroline: The Role of Art in Emotional-Moral Reflection on Risky and Controversial Technologies: The Case of BNCI. In: Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21 (2018), 275–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, W.David: The Right and the Good. Oxford 1967 [1930].

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrader-Frechette, Kristin S.: Risk and rationality: Philosophical foundations for populist reforms. Berkeley 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, Paul: The Feeling of Risk. London 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, Alexa/Pidgeon, Nick: Framing and Communicating Climate Change: The Effects of Distance and Outcome Frame Manipulations. In: Global Environmental Change 20 (2010), 656–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C.R. (2005a). Laws of fear. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Taebi, Behnam/Roeser, Sabine (Hg.): The Ethics of Nuclear Energy. Cambridge 2015.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands

    Sabine Roeser

Authors
  1. Sabine Roeser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. ITAS, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Baden-Württemberg, Deutschland

    Armin Grunwald

  2. ITAS, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Baden-Württemberg, Deutschland

    Rafaela Hillerbrand

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Roeser, S. (2021). Emotionen und ethische Beurteilung technologischer Risiken. In: Grunwald, A., Hillerbrand, R. (eds) Handbuch Technikethik. J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04901-8_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04901-8_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: J.B. Metzler, Stuttgart

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-476-04900-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-476-04901-8

  • eBook Packages: J.B. Metzler Humanities (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation