Skip to main content
Log in

Sorites

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Bibliography

  • Black, M.: 1937, ‘Vagueness: An Exercise in Logical Analysis’,Philosophy of Science 4. Reprinted in M. Black,Language and Philosophy, Cornell University Press, New York, 1949.

  • Black, M.: 1963, ‘Reasoning with Loose Concepts’,Dialogue.

  • Campbell, R.: 1974, ‘The Sorites Paradox’,Philosophical Studies 26.

  • Cargile, J.: 1969, ‘The Sorites Paradox’,British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 20.

  • Davidson, D.: 1970, ‘Mental Events’ in L. Foster and J. Swanson (eds.)Experience and Theory, University of Massachusetts Press.

  • Dummett, M.: 1975, ‘Wang’s Paradox’,Synthese 30.

  • Fine, K.: 1975, ‘Vagueness, Truth and Logic’,Synthese 30.

  • Goguen, J. A.: 1968–1969, ‘The Logic of Inexact Concepts’,Synthese 19.

  • Halldén, S.: 1949,The Logic of Nonsense, Uppsala Universitets Årsskrift.

  • Halldén, S.: 1961,Universum, döden och den logiska analysen, Gleerup, Lund.

  • Kamp, J. A. W.: 1975, ‘Two Theories about Adjectives’, in E.L. Keenan (ed.)Formal Semantics of Natural Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J. L.: 1979, ‘Bivalence and the Sorites Paradox’,American Philosophical Quarterly 16.

  • Körner, S.: 1966,Experience and Theory, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machina, K. F.: 1976, ‘Truth, Belief and Vagueness’,Journal of Philosophical Logic 5.

  • Morgan, C. G. and F. J. Pelletier: 1977, ‘Some Notes Concerning Fuzzy Logics’,Linguistics and Philosophy 1.

  • Odegard, D.: 1965, ‘Excluding the Middle from Loose Concepts’,Theoria 31.

  • Phalén, A.: 1931, ‘Our Common Notions and their Dialectic Movements in the History of Philosophy’,Proceedings of the 7th International Congress of Philosophy, Oxford.

  • Przelecki, M.: 1969,The Logic of Empirical Theories, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przelecki, M.: 1976, ‘Fuzziness as Multiplicity’,Erkenntnis 10.

  • Przelecki, M.: 1977, ‘The Concept of Truth in Empirical Languages’,Grazer Philosophische Studien 3.

  • Rolf, B.: 1980, ‘A Theory of Vagueness’,Journal of Philosophical Logic 9.

  • Rolf, B.: 1981,Topics on Vagueness, Fil.Dr. Thesis, Lund.

  • Russell, B.: 1923, ‘Vagueness’,Australasian Journal of Philosophy and Psychology 1.

  • Russell, B.: 1903,The Principles of Mathematics.

  • Sanford, D. H.: 1975, ‘Infinity and Vagueness’,The Philosophical Review 84.

  • Sanford, D. H.: 1976, ‘Competing Semantics of Vagueness: Many Values versus Super-Truth’,Synthese 33.

  • Sanford, D. H.: 1979, ‘Nostalgia for the Ordinary: Comments on Papers by Unger and Wheeler’,Synthese 41.

  • Tarski, A.: 1944, ‘The Semantic Conception of Truth’,Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4. Reprinted in L. Linsky (ed.)Semantics and the Philosophy of Language, University of Illionois Press, Champaign, 1952. Page references to the latter.

  • Unger, P.: 1979, ‘There are no Ordinary Things’,Synthese 41.

  • Wheeler, S. c.: 1973, ‘A Solution to Wang’s Paradox’, mimeo, University of Connecticut.

  • Wheeler, S. c.: 1975, ‘Reference and Vagueness’,Synthese 30.

  • Wheeler, S. c.: 1979, ‘On That Which is Not’,Synthese 41.

  • Weiss, S. E.: 1976, ‘The Sorites Fallacy: What Difference does a Peanut Make?’,Synthese 33.

  • Wright, C.: 1975, ‘On the Coherence of Vague Predicates’,Synthese 30.

  • Zadeh, L. A.: 1975, ‘Fuzzy Logic and Approximate Reasoning’,Synthese 30.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rolf, B. Sorites. Synthese 58, 219–250 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03055306

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03055306

Keywords

Navigation