Abstract
Most direct reference theorists believe that ‘I’ is a pure indexical. This means that when ‘I’ is uttered, it contributes with the speaker to what is said. But, from some conceptions of metonymy as reference transfer, if ‘I’ is used metonymically, it has an improper meaning and the object referred to is not the speaker. We will show that all theories of metonymy as transfer are inadequate and so they cannot determine if the metonymic use of ‘I’ is a counterexample to its consideration as a pure indexical or not. We argue that the appropriate conception on metonymy is to consider it as a case of language reduction and that ‘I’, when used metonymically, is just a part of a non-textual complete noun phrase; ‘I’ has the semantic value that it usually has. The metonymic use of ‘I’ does not risk the consideration of ‘I’ as a pure indexical.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Nunberg, G.: Indexicality and Deixis. Linguistics and Philosophy 16, 1–43 (1993)
Nunberg, G.: Transfers of Meaning. Journal of Semantics 12, 109–132 (1995)
Romero, E., Soria, B.: La Metonimia Referencial. Theoría 17/3, 435–455 (2002)
Kaplan, D.: Demonstratives. An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics, and Epistemology of Demonstratives and other In-dexicals. In: Almog, H., Wettstein, H., Perry, J. (eds.) Themes from Kaplan, pp. 481–563. Oxford University Press, New York (1989)
Recanati, F.: Direct Reference: From Language to Thought. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1993)
Grice, H.P.: Logic and Conversation. In: Cole, P., Morgan, J. (eds.) Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, pp. 41–58. Academic Press, New York (1975)
Romero, E., Soria, B.: Comunicación y Metáfora. Análisis Filosófico XXII/2, 167–192 (2003)
Romero, E., Soria, B.: A View of Novel Metaphor in the Light of Recanati’s Proposals. In: Frápolli, M.J. (ed.) Saying, Meaning and Refering. Essays on François Recanati’s Philosophy of Language, Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition, London (forthcoming)
Recanati, F.: The Alleged Priority of Literal Interpretation. Cogni-tive Science 19, 207–232 (1995)
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M.: Metaphors We Live by. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago (1980)
Huddlestone, R.: Introduction of the Grammar of English. Cam-bridge University Press, Cambridge (1984)
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., Svartvik, J.: A Comprenhen-sive Grammar of the English Language. Longman, London (1985)
Burton-Roberts, N.: Analysing Sentences. Longman, London (1986)
Romero, E., Soria, B.: Novel Metaphor and Novel Metonymy as Primary Pragmatic Processes. In: Garrido, P. (ed.) Grammar and Discourse: Interactions (forthcoming)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Romero, E., Soria, B. (2005). ‘I’ as a Pure Indexical and Metonymy as Language Reduction. In: Dey, A., Kokinov, B., Leake, D., Turner, R. (eds) Modeling and Using Context. CONTEXT 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3554. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11508373_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11508373_33
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-26924-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31890-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)