Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reconsidering Methodological Arguments: A Commentary on Stephen L. Smith’s Paper ‘Naïve Expertise: Spacious Alternative to the Standard Account of Method (SAM)’

  • Published:
Philosophy of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of South Africa (College of Human Sciences), South Africa

    Norma Romm (Professor, Dean)

  2. Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Swaziland, Swaziland

    Norma Romm (Professor, Dean)

  3. Social Sciences and Humanities, European University Cyprus, Cyprus

    Norma Romm (Professor, Dean)

Authors
  1. Norma Romm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Romm, N. Reconsidering Methodological Arguments: A Commentary on Stephen L. Smith’s Paper ‘Naïve Expertise: Spacious Alternative to the Standard Account of Method (SAM)’. Philos. of Manag. 10, 75–90 (2011). https://doi.org/10.5840/pom20111026

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/pom20111026

Keywords

Search

Navigation