Skip to main content
Log in

Discussion (B) Re-ordering ethical sensitivity with Pavlich: notes on abolitionism

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Criminal Law and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bataille, G. (1988). (1992). The accursed share: An essay on general economy (vol. 1–3). New York: Zone Books.

  • Chryssostalis, J. (2005). The critical instance after the critique of the subject. Law & Critique, 16, 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Critchley, S. (1999). Ethics, Politics, Subjectivity. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1994). Force de Loi. Paris: Galilee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, P. (2001). Modernity and the Grounds of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (1998). The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motha, S., Zartaloudis, T. (2003). Law, ethics, and the utopian end of human rights, Social & Legal Studies, 12, 243–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlich, G. (2005). Experiencing critique. Law and Critique, 16, 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, D. (1995). Geographies of Exclusion. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank George Pavlich and Erik Claes for comments given on an earlier version of this contribution. Some ideas in this contribution were first presented on the occasion of the symposium on ‘Criminal Law and Philosophy’, October 2005, London. Thanks go to the British Academy and to all participants in the symposium.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronnie Lippens.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lippens, R. Discussion (B) Re-ordering ethical sensitivity with Pavlich: notes on abolitionism. Criminal Law, Philosophy 1, 107–113 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-006-9005-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-006-9005-y

Keywords

Navigation