References
Bataille, G. (1988). (1992). The accursed share: An essay on general economy (vol. 1–3). New York: Zone Books.
Chryssostalis, J. (2005). The critical instance after the critique of the subject. Law & Critique, 16, 3–25.
Critchley, S. (1999). Ethics, Politics, Subjectivity. London: Verso.
Derrida, J. (1994). Force de Loi. Paris: Galilee.
Fitzpatrick, P. (2001). Modernity and the Grounds of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lacan, J. (1998). The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis. London: Vintage.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Motha, S., Zartaloudis, T. (2003). Law, ethics, and the utopian end of human rights, Social & Legal Studies, 12, 243–268.
Pavlich, G. (2005). Experiencing critique. Law and Critique, 16, 95–112.
Sibley, D. (1995). Geographies of Exclusion. London: Routledge.
Acknowledgements
The author wishes to thank George Pavlich and Erik Claes for comments given on an earlier version of this contribution. Some ideas in this contribution were first presented on the occasion of the symposium on ‘Criminal Law and Philosophy’, October 2005, London. Thanks go to the British Academy and to all participants in the symposium.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lippens, R. Discussion (B) Re-ordering ethical sensitivity with Pavlich: notes on abolitionism. Criminal Law, Philosophy 1, 107–113 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-006-9005-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-006-9005-y