Abstract
Much attention has been given in recent years to the moral status of commercial spam. Less attention has been focused on newer, non-commercial varieties of spam, such as spam from political parties, community sector organizations and governments. This article makes a start on evaluating the moral status of these non-commercial varieties of spam, drawing on arguments used to evaluate commercial spam.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CSO:
-
Civil Society Organisation
- ISP:
-
Internet Service Provider
References
Brightmail. Internet Archive WayBack Machine. Online available at http://web.archive.org/web/*/http:/www. brightmail.com/spamstats.html. Accessed 06.08.07.
J. Feinberg. Offense to Others: The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law. Oxford University Press, New York Oxford . 1985.
R. Grant. Federal Government advertising. Parliamentary Library Research Note 62, 2003–4. Online available at http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/rn/2003-04/04rn62.htm. Accessed 05.15.07.
J. Habermas. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, translated by C. Lenhardt and S. W. Nicholsen. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1991.
M. Lyons. Third Sector: The Contribution of Nonprofit and Co-operative Enterprises in Australia. Allen and Unwin, Sydney. 2001.
MessageLabs. MessageLabs Intelligence: ‹Spam Spikes – The Battering Ram of Spam,’ May 2007. Online available at http://www.messagelabs.com/Threat_Watch/Intelligence_ Reports. Accessed 06.08.07.
C. Metz. Get Ready for an Avalanche of Election-Year Spam. PC Magazine, July 14, 2004. Online available at http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1623655,00.asp. Accessed 05.15.07.
K. Mieszkowski. Political spam: Get Used to It. Salon.com, November 20, 2002. Online Available at http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/2002/11/20/political_spam/. Accessed 05.15.07.
J.S. Mill. On Liberty. Hackett Publishing Press, Indianapolis. 1978.
Parliamentary Library, Australia. Political Advertising in Australia. Research Brief 5, November 29, 2004.
D. Parfit. Reasons and Persons. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 1984.
I. Ramsay. Consumer Protection: Text and Materials. Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London. 1989.
J. Raz. The Morality of Freedom. Clarendon Press, Oxford. 1986.
R. Shiner. Freedom of Commercial Expression. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 2003.
R. Spinello. Ethical Reflections on the Problem of Spam. Ethics and Information Technology 1(1): 185–191. 1999.
R. Sullivan. An Introduction to Kant’s Ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 1994.
S.M. Herald. Call for Probe into PM’s Election Spam. Sydney Morning Herald, August 27 2004. Online available at www.smh.com.au. Accessed 05.15.07.
H. Tavani. Ethics and Technology: Ethical Issues in an Age of Information and Communication Technology. Wiley and Sons, New Jersey. 2004.
P. Van Onselen and W. Errington. Voter Tracking Software: The Dark Side of Technology and Democracy. Paper prepared for the Australian Electronic Governance Conference, Centre for Public Policy, University of Melbourne, April 14 and 15,2004. Online available at http://www.public-policy.unimelb.edu.au/egovernance/papers/ 39_Vanolsen.pdf. Accessed 05.15.07.
Acknowledgement
I would like to thank James Moor for encouraging me to write an article on this topic, and an anonymous reviewer for highlighting the ethical importance of the mechanisms by which individuals are enabled to exercise a choice not to receive spam.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rooksby, E. The ethical status of non-commercial spam. Ethics Inf Technol 9, 141–152 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-007-9136-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-007-9136-4