Abstract
Management has the opportunity to promote self-serving accounting practices, such as earnings management, when management can effectively avoid oversight by the audit committee. This article investigates the effects of financial knowledge and dispositional trust on the ability of audit committee members to recognize management attempts to avoid full disclosure to the board and potentially deceive board members. The results of a controlled laboratory experiment with 40 experienced audit committee member participants indicate that: (1) Audit committee members with less financial knowledge are more likely to accept insufficient client explanations for accounting judgments than are more knowledgeable audit committee members; (2) Audit committee members with less financial knowledge are more likely to reject sufficient client explanations for accounting judgments than are more knowledgeable audit committee members; and (3) Audit committee members that place higher levels of trust in others are more likely to accept insufficient client explanations for accounting judgments than are less trusting committee members.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abbott L., S. Parker, & G. Peters.: 2004, Audit Committee Characteristics and Restatements, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 23, 69–87
Agrawal A., & S. Chadha.: 2005, Corporate Governance and Accounting Scandals, Journal of Law and Economics 48, 371–406
Anderson U., L. Koonce, & G. Marchant.: 1994, The Effects of Source-Competence Information and its Timing on Auditors’ Performance of Analytical Procedures, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 13(1), 137–148
Bamber E.: 1983, Expert Judgment in the Audit Team: A Source Reliability Approach Journal of Accounting Research 21, 396–412
Beccaria C.: 1963, On Crime and Punishment, Bobbs Merril: Indianapolis, IN
Becker G.: 1968, Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach, Journal of Political Economy 76, 169–217
Birnbaum M., & S. Stegner.: 1979, Source Credibility in Social Judgment: Bias, Expertise, and the Judge’s Point of View, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37, 48–74
Buckley A., & M. Van Der Nat.: 2003, Derivatives and the Non-Executive Director, European Management Journal 21, 389–297
Chaiken S., & D. Maheswaran.: 1994, Heuristic Processing can Bias Systematic Processing: Effects of Source Credibility, Argument Ambiguity, and Task Importance on Attitude Judgment, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66, 460–473
Cressey D. R.: 1973, Other People’s Money, Montclair, NJ: Patterson Smith
Davidson W., B. Xie, & W. Xu.: 2004, Market Reaction to Voluntary Announcements of Audit Committee Appointments: The Effect of Financial Expertise, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 23, 279–293
Dechow P., R. Sloan, & A. Sweeney.: 1996, Causes and Consequences of Earnings Manipulation, an Analysis of Firm Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC Contemporary Accounting Research 13, 1–36
DeFond M., R. Hann, & X. Hu.: 2005, Does the Market Value Financial Expertise on Audit Committees of Boards of Directors?, Journal of Accounting Research 43, 153–193
Deutsch M.: 1973, The Resolution Of Conflict: Constructive and Destructive Processes, New Haven, CN: Yale University Press
Elias R.: 2002, Determinants of Earnings Management Ethics Among Accountants Journal of Business Ethics 40, 33–45
Farber D. B.: 2005, Restoring Trust after Fraud: Does Corporate Governance Matter?, The Accounting Review 80(2), 539–561
Flynn J., P. Slovic, & H. Kunreuther.: 2001, Risk, Media, and Stigma: Understanding Public Challenges to Modern Science and Technology, London: Earthscan Publications, Ltd
Goffman, E.: 1959, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Penguin Books)
Harnett L., & L. Cummings.: 1980, Bargaining Behavior: An International Study, Houston: Dame Publications
Healy P.: 1985, The Effect of Bonus Schemes on Accounting Decisions, Journal of Accounting and Economics 33, 85–107
Hirst D.: 1994, Auditor’s Sensitivity to Source Reliability, Journal of Accounting Research 32, 113–126
Kaplan S.: 2001, Ethically Related Judgments by Observers of Earnings Management, Journal of Business Ethics 32, 285–298
Kasperson R., R. Ortwin, P. Slovic, H. Brown, J. Emel, R. Goble, J. Kasperson, & S. Ratick.: 1988, The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework, Risk Analysis 8, 177–187
Merchant K. A., & J. Rockness.: 1994, The Ethics of Managing Earnings: An Empirical Investigation, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 13, 79–94
Morse, G.: 2004, ‹Audit Committees can’t Add’, Harvard Business Review 82(5)
New York Stock Exchange.: 1999, Report of the Blue Ribbon Committee on Improving the Effectiveness of Corporate Audit Committees
New York Stock Exchange.: 2003, Standard 303A.06 Audit Committee
Perino M.: 2002, Enron’s Legislative Aftermath: Some Reflections on the Deterrence Aspects of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002, St. John’s Law Review 76(4), 671–698
Petty R., & J. Caccioppo.: 1977, Forewarning, Cognitive Responding, and Resistance to Persuasion, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35, 645–655
Pidgeon N., R. Kasperson, & P. Slovic (Eds.).: 2002, The Social Amplification of Risk, London: Cambridge University Press
Powers, W., R. Troubh and H. Winokur: 2002, Report of the Investigation by the Special Investigative Committee of the Board of Directors of Enron Corp., Austin, TX
Rempel J., J. Holmes, & M. Zanna.: 1985, Trust in Close Relationships, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49, 95–112
Rose J.: 2007, Attention to Aggressive and Potentially Fraudulent Reporting: Effects of Experience and Trust, Behavioral Research in Accounting 19, 215–229
Rose A., & J. Rose.: 2003, The Effects of Fraud Risk Assessments and a Risk Analysis Decision Aid on Auditors’ Evaluation of Evidence and Judgment, Accounting Forum 27(3), 312–338
Rose, J, A. Rose and M. Dibben: 2007, ‹Trust and Assurance: Are Business Leaders Overly Trusting?’, Working Paper, Southern Illinois University
Rosen R.: 2003, Risk Management and Corporate Governance: the Case of Enron, Connecticut Law Review 35, 1157–1184
Rotter J.: 1980, Interpersonal Trust, Trustworthiness, and Gullibility, American Psychologist 35, 1–7
Sarbanes-Oxley Act.: 2002, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Congress
Schul Y.: 1993, When Warning Succeeds: The Effect of Warning on Success of Ignoring Invalid Information, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 29, 42–62
Schul Y., E. Burnstein, & A. Bardi.: 1996, Dealing with Deceptions that are Difficult to Detect: Encoding and Judgment as a Function of Preparing to Receive Invalid Information, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 32, 228–253
Shaub M.: 1996, Trust and Suspicion: The Effects of Situational and Dispositional Factors on Auditors’ Trust of Clients, Behavioral Research in Accounting 8, 154–174
Staubus G.: 2005, Ethics Failures in Corporate Financial Reporting Journal of Business Ethics 57, 5–15
United States Security and Exchange Commission.: 2003, 17 CFR 240.10A-3. Washington, DC
Walster E., E. Aronson, & D. Abrahams.: 1966, On Increasing the Persuasiveness of a Low Prestige Communicator, Journal of Experimental Psychology 2, 325–342
Williams K. R., & R. Hawkins: 1986, Perceptual Research on General Deterrence: A Critical Review, Law and Society Review 20(4), 545–572
Wrightsman L.: 1974, Assumptions About Human Nature: A Social-Psychological Approach, Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company
Wrightsman L. S.: 1991, Interpersonal Trust and Attitudes toward Human Nature, In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes: Vol. 1: Measures of Social Psychological Attitudes, 373–412. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rose, A.M., Rose, J.M. Management Attempts to Avoid Accounting Disclosure Oversight: The Effects of Trust and Knowledge on Corporate Directors’ Governance Ability. J Bus Ethics 83, 193–205 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9611-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9611-1