Skip to main content
Log in

Sleeper Agents: The Sense of Agency Over the Dream Body

  • Theoretical / Philosophical Paper
  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the sense of agency is often reduced if not absent in dreams, our agentive dream experiences can at times be similar to or enhanced compared to waking. The sense of agency displayed in dreams is perplexing as we are mostly shut off from real stimulus whilst asleep. Theories of waking sense of agency, in particular, comparator and holistic models, are analysed in order to argue that despite the isolation from the real environment, these models can help account for dream experience. The dreamer might feel an increased sense of control of their dream bodies and a sense that they can directly control elements of the dream world. Such experiences may at times be caused by superstitious or delusional thinking due to altered cognition and changes to the sleeping brain. Here it is argued that some such experiences are akin to specific waking delusions, such as delusions of grandeur, with similar cognitive features. However, other instances of increased sense of agency in dreaming appear to be sui generis and nothing like what we experience when awake. Lucid control dreams, in which the dreamer realises that they are dreaming and that they can control the dream environment, are examples of such an experience although further nuance is required to account for their specific cognitive attributes. Future empirical research should focus on controlled dream reporting conditions in order to clarify the types of experience that occur and determine the relevant cognitive mechanisms that relate to each type.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. “Dream Text: Last Night's Dream—last_nights_dream), 66 words, ad2007_paul[2006–07-08].

  2. Sleepanddreamsdatabase.org.

  3. Dream Text: Last Night's Dream—last_nights_dream), 86 words, kb_dj_2018:kb_dj_2018:kb [2018–09-05].

  4. Dream Text: Last Night's Dream—last_nights_dream), 728 words, kb_dj_2016a:kb_dj_2016a:kb [2016–11-26].

  5. Examples of extracts from dream report containing references to common superstitious elements: 1. […]travelling by airplane. A croquet ball suddenly smashes the mirror, an indispensable instrument of navigation, and the airplane crashes to the ground. […] Dream Text: Last Night's Dream—last_nights_dream), 47 words, paulidreams:pauli[Answer Date Unknown].

    2. A black cat which would not get out of my house and every time i thought it was gone it would appear on a chair in my spare bedroom and just stare at me. i keep that door shut all the time now because it was really terrifying. Dream Text: Most Memorable—harris_2011:Q1005), 56 words, harris_2011:011,619 [Answer Date Unknown]. Neither of these reports relate to a specific SoA but do indicate that such elements may occur in dreams.

  6. (Dream Text: Last Night's Dream—last_nights_dream), 85 words, recent_dreams_2015:27,780 [Answer Date Unknown]).

  7. (Dream Text: Last Night's Dream 2—last_nights_dream2), 225). sleepanddreamdatabase.org.

  8. Dream Text: Awareness—harris_2012:Q1035), 17 words, harris_2012:003075[2012–01–01].

  9. Dream Text: Most Recent Dream—Q15), 158 words, krippner_survey1:krusf111[Answer Date Unknown].

  10. Dream Text: Last Night's Dream—last_nights_dream), 622 words, km2015:km[2003–04–27].

  11. Dream Text: Last Night's Dream—last_nights_dream), 89 words,recent_dreams_2015:17,753 [Answer Date Unknown].

  12. All reports are extracts from reports in sleepanddreamsdatabase.org.

  13. Dream Text: Last Night's Dream—last_nights_dream), 150 words, td2017:td116[2016–11-20].

  14. Dream Text: Most Memorable—harris_2011:Q1005), 97 words, harris_2011:047,002 [Answer Date Unknown].

  15. Dream Text: Last Night's Dream—last_nights_dream), 667 words, rb_dreams:rb[Answer Date Unknown].

  16. Telekinetic dreams: Dream Text: Awareness—harris_2012:Q1035), 40 words, harris_2012:001976[2012–01-01].

  17. Dream Text: Last Night's Dream—last_nights_dream), 134 words, sersa:s112[Answer Date Unknown].

  18. Beverly Journal 1986 beverly_1986:beverly 03–10-2017 sleepanddreamsdatabase.org.

  19. Nepal Dreams 2014 nepaldreams:nishan_s 11–23–2014 sleepanddreamsdatabase.org.

  20. Trump Dreams 2016–2017 td2017:td163 04–07–2017 sleepanddreamsdatabase.org.

  21. We many not have the cognitive capacity for such reflection during some dreams since cognition, especially higher-order cognition, is often limited, but my view is that it is possible to have JoAs in some dreams, especially the lucid variety.

References

  • Aarts, H., Custers, R., & Wegner, D. M. (2005). On the inference of personal authorship: Enhancing experienced agency by priming effect information. Consciousness and Cognition, 14(3), 439–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2004.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, M., Nielbo, K. L., Schjoedt, U., Pfeiffer, T., Roepstorff, A., & Sørensen, J. (2018). Predictive minds in Ouija board sessions. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 18(3), 577–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appel, K., Pipa, G., & Dresler, M. (2017). Investigating consciousness in the sleep laboratory – an interdisciplinary perspective on lucid dreaming. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2017.1380468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, P. S., Robbins, P. C., & Roth, L. H. (1999). Dimensional approach to delusions: Comparison across types and diagnoses. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156(12), 1938–1943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnulf, I. (2019). RBD: A window into the dreaming process. In C. H. Schenck, B. Högl, & A. Videnovic (Eds.), Rapid-eye-movement sleep behavior disorder (pp. 223–242). Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayne, T., & Pacherie, E. (2007). Narrators and comparators: The architecture of agentive self-awareness. Synthese, 159(3), 475–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J., & Forstmeier, W. (2007). Superstition and belief as inevitable by-products of an adaptive learning strategy. Human Nature, 18(1), 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentall, R. P., Kinderman, P., & Kaney, S. (1994). The self, attributional processes and abnormal beliefs: Towards a model of persecutory delusions. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32(3), 331–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berti, A., Spinazzola, L., Pia, L., Rabuffetti, M., Haggard, P., & Rossetti, Y. (2007). Motor awareness and motor intention in anosognosia for hemiplegia. In Attention and performance XXII, sensorimotor foundations of higher cognition (pp. 163–181). Oxford University Press

  • Blakemore, S.-J., Wolpert, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (1998). Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation. Nature Neuroscience, 1(7), 635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore, S.-J., Wolpert, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (1999). The cerebellum contributes to somatosensory cortical activity during self-produced tactile stimulation. NeuroImage, 10(4), 448–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanke, O., & Mohr, C. (2005). Out-of-body experience, heautoscopy, and autoscopic hallucination of neurological origin: Implications for neurocognitive mechanisms of corporeal awareness and self-consciousness. Brain Research Reviews, 50(1), 184–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, M. S. (2010). Beyond dreams: Do sleep-related movements contribute to brain development? Frontiers in Neurology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2010.00140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, M. S., Coleman, C. M., Gerth, A. I., & McMurray, B. (2013). Spatiotemporal structure of REM sleep twitching reveals developmental origins of motor synergies. Current Biology, 23(21), 2100–2109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hands ‘feel’touch that eyes see. Nature, 391(6669), 756–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bünning, S., & Blanke, O. (2005). The out-of body experience: Precipitating factors and neural correlates. Progress in Brain Research, 150, 331–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambon, V., Filevich, E., & Haggard, P. (2014). What is the human sense of agency, and is it Metacognitive? In S. M. Fleming & C. D. Frith (Eds.), The cognitive neuroscience of metacognition (pp. 321–342). Springer.

  • Cheyne, J. A. (2000). Play, dreams, and simulation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(6), 918–919.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheyne, J. A., Rueffer, S. D., & Newby-Clark, I. R. (1999). Hypnagogic and hypnopompic hallucinations during sleep paralysis: Neurological and cultural construction of the night-mare. Consciousness and Cognition, 8(3), 319–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M. (2005). Conscious experience and delusional belief. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 12(2), 153–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corlett, P. R., Taylor, J. R., Wang, X. J., Fletcher, P. C., & Krystal, J. H. (2010a). Toward a neurobiology of delusions. Progress in Neurobiology, 92(3), 345–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.06.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M., Coltheart, M., Langdon, R., & Breen, N. (2001). Monothematic delusions: Towards a two-factor account. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 8(2), 133–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. A., & Carr, T. H. (2013). When dyads act in parallel, a sense of agency for the auditory consequences depends on the order of the actions. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(1), 155–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. A., Pacherie, E., & Knoblich, G. (2014). The phenomenology of controlling a moving object with another person. Cognition, 132(3), 383–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domhoff, G. W. (2007). Realistic simulation and bizarreness in dream content: past findings and suggestions for future research. In D. Barrett & P. McNamara (Eds.), The new science of dreaming (pp. 1–28). Westport: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domhoff, G. W., & Schneider, A. (2018). Are dreams social simulations? Or are they enactments of conceptions and personal concerns? An empirical and theoretical comparison of two dream theories. Dreaming, 28(1), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dresler, M., Wehrle, R., Spoormaker, V. I., Steiger, A., Holsboer, F., Czisch, M., et al. (2015). Neural correlates of insight in dreaming and psychosis. Sleep Medicine Reviews, 20, 92–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, R. D., & Shor, R. E. (1976). An experimental analysis of the Chevreul pendulum illusion. The Journal of General Psychology, 95(1), 111–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrer, C., Bouchereau, M., Jeannerod, M., & Franck, N. (2008). Effect of distorted visual feedback on the sense of agency. Behavioural Neurology, 19, 53–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulkes, D. (1979). Home and laboratory dreams: Four empirical studies and a conceptual reevaluation. Sleep, 2(2), 233–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulkes, D., & Kerr, N. H. (1994). Point of view in nocturnal dreaming. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78(2), 690–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, C. D. (2005). The self in action: Lessons from delusions of control. Consciousness and Cognition, 14(4), 752–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, C. D. (2012). Explaining delusions of control: The comparator model 20years on. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(1), 52–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, C. D. (2014). The cognitive neuropsychology of schizophrenia. Psychology Press.

  • Gallagher, S. (2012). Multiple aspects in the sense of agency. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(1), 15–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, J. (2010). Superstition and human agency. Implicit Religion. https://doi.org/10.1558/imre.v13i3.307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, F. K., & Jamison, K. R. (2007). Manic-depressive illness: Bipolar disorders and recurrent depression (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press.

  • Haggard, P., Martin, F., Taylor-Clarke, M., Jeannerod, M., & Franck, N. (2003). Awareness of action in schizophrenia. NeuroReport, 14(7), 1081–1085. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wnr.0000073684.00308.c0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, E. (2000). The waking-to-dreaming continuum and the effects of emotion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(06), 947–950. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00474029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, J. A. (2004). A model for madness? Nature, 430(6995), 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, J. A. (2005). In bed with mark solms? what a nightmare! A reply to Domhoff (2005). Dreaming, 15(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/1053-0797.15.1.21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, J. A., & Schredl, M. (2011). The continuity and discontinuity between waking and dreaming: A dialogue between Michael Schredl and Allan Hobson concerning the adequacy and completeness of these notions. International Journal of Dream Research, 4(1), 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, J. A., & Voss, U. (2011). A mind to go out of: Reflections on primary and secondary consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(4), 993–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2010.09.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, J. A., Pace-Schott, E. F., & Stickgold, R. (2000). Dreaming and the brain: Toward a cognitive neuroscience of conscious states. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(6), 793–842.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ichikawa, J. (2008). Skepticism and the imagination model of dreaming. Philosophical Quarterly, 58(232), 519–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ichikawa, J. (2016). Imagination, dreaming, and hallucination. In Routledge handbook of the philosophy of imagination (pp. 149–162). Routledge.

  • Kahan, T. L., & LaBerge, S. (1994). Lucid dreaming as metacognition: Implications for cognitive science. Consciousness and Cognition, 3(2), 246–264. https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.1994.1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowles, R., McCarthy-Jones, S., & Rowse, G. (2011). Grandiose delusions: A review and theoretical integration of cognitive and affective perspectives. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(4), 684–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubota, Y., Takasu, N. N., Horita, S., Kondo, M., Shimizu, M., Okada, T., et al. (2011). Dorsolateral prefrontal cortical oxygenation during REM sleep in humans. Brain Research, 1389, 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2011.02.061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liddon, S. C. (1967). Sleep paralysis and hypnagogic hallucinations: Their relationship to the nightmare. Archives of General Psychiatry, 17(1), 88–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J.-R. (2013). Experiences of activity and causality in schizophrenia: When predictive deficits lead to a retrospective over-binding. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(4), 1361–1374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J.-R., & Pacherie, E. (2013). Out of nowhere: Thought insertion, ownership and context-integration. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(1), 111–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzinger, T. (2003). Phenomenal transparency and cognitive self-reference. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 2(4), 353–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzinger, T. (2014). What is the specific significance of dream research for philosophy of mind? In N. Tranquillo (Ed.), Dream consciousness: Allan Hobson’s new approach to the brain and its mind (pp. 161–166). Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. W. (2016). What is the sense of agency and why does it matter? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1272. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. W., Wegner, D. M., & Haggard, P. (2009). Modulating the sense of agency with external cues. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(4), 1056–1064.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, R. C. (1997). Intentions, self-monitoring and abnormal experiences. Philosophical Psychology, 10(1), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089708573205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, W. H., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). A second type of superstition in the pigeon. The American Journal of Psychology, 70(2), 308–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, J. M. (1988). Defensive functions of manic episodes. In T. Oltmanns & B. Maher (Eds.), Delusional beliefs. New York: Wiley.

  • Nielsen, T. A. (1993). Changes in the kinesthetic content of dreams following somatosensory stimulation of leg muscles during REM sleep. Dreaming, 3(2), 99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, T. A., & Zadra, A. (2005). Nightmares and other common dream disturbances. Principles and Practice of Sleep Medicine, 4, 926–935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, T. A., Ouellet, L., & Zadra, A. L. (1995). Pressure stimulation during REM sleep alters dream limb activity and body bizarreness. Sleep Res, 24, 134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noreika, V., Windt, J. M., Lenggenhager, B., & Karim, A. A. (2010). New perspectives for the study of lucid dreaming: From brain stimulation to philosophical theories of self-consciousness. International Journal of Dream Research, 3, 36–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oudiette, D., De Cock, V. C., Lavault, S., Leu, S., Vidailhet, M., & Arnulf, I. (2009). Nonviolent elaborate behaviors may also occur in REM sleep behavior disorder. Neurology, 72(6), 551. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000341936.78678.3a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, A. (2017). Current research on lucid dreaming and shared lucidity states. In Book of abstracts of the 41st SPR international annual conference (Vol. 35, pp. 11–13). Society to Psychical Research.

  • Parker, J. D., & Blackmore, S. J. (2002). Comparing the content of sleep paralysis and dream reports. Dreaming, 12(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013894522583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proust, J. (2013). The philosophy of metacognition: Mental agency and self-awareness. OUP Oxford.

  • Ramadan, R. A., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2017). Brain computer interface: Control signals review. Neurocomputing, 223, 26–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raune, D., Bebbington, P., Dunn, G., & Kuipers, E. (2006). Event attributes and the content of psychotic experiences in first-episode psychosis. Psychological Medicine, 36(2), 221–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revonsuo, A., Tuominen, J., & Valli, K. (2015a). The avatars in the machine: Dreaming as a simulation of social reality. In Open MIND: Open MIND. MIND Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revonsuo, A., Tuominen, J., & Valli, K. (2015b). The simulation theories of dreaming: How to make theoretical progress in dream science. In Open MIND: Open MIND. MIND Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, M. G. (2013). What I make up when I wake up: Anti-experience views and narrative fabrication of dreams. [Hypothesis & Theory]. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, M. G. (2018a). How bizarre? A pluralist approach to dream content. Consciousness and Cognition, 62, 148–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, M. G. (2018b). Your dream-body: All an illusion? Commentary on Windt’s account of the dream-body in dreaming. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 25(5–6), 44–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, M. G. (2019). Dreaming of a stable world: Vision and action in sleep. Synthese, 1–36.

  • Rosen, M. G. (2021). I could do that in my sleep: Skilled performance in dreams. Synthese, 1–28.

  • Rosen, M. G., & Sutton, J. (2013). Self-representation and perspectives in dreams. Philosophy Compass, 8(11), 1041–1053. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato, A., & Yasuda, A. (2005). Illusion of sense of self-agency: Discrepancy between the predicted and actual sensory consequences of actions modulates the sense of self-agency, but not the sense of self-ownership. Cognition, 94(3), 241–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarone, S., Manzone, M. L., Gambini, O., Kantzas, I., Limosani, I., D’agostino, A., et al. (2007). The dream as a model for psychosis: An experimental approach using bizarreness as a cognitive marker. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 34(3), 515–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzman, M., Worsley, A., & Fenwick, P. (1988). Correspondence during lucid dreams between dreamed and actual events. In Conscious mind, sleeping brain (pp. 155–179). Springer.

  • Schredl, M., & Hofmann, F. (2003). Continuity between waking activities and dream activities. Consciousness and Cognition, 12(2), 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8100(02)00072-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwitzgebel, E. (2002). Why did we think we dreamed in black and white? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 33(4), 649–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwitzgebel, E. (2003). Do people still report dreaming in black and white? An attempt to replicate a questionnaire from 1942. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 96(1), 25–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwitzgebel, E., Huang, C., & Zhou, Y. (2006). Do we dream in color? Cultural variations and skepticism. Dreaming, 16(1), 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikka, P., Revonsuo, A., Sandman, N., Tuominen, J., & Valli, K. (2018). Dream emotions: A comparison of home dream reports with laboratory early and late REM dream reports. Journal of Sleep Research, 27(2), 206–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1948). ‘Superstition’ in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38(2), 168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, W. (2017). Agency and practical abilities. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 80, 235–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N., Freeman, D., & Kuipers, E. (2005). Grandiose delusions: An experimental investigation of the delusion as defense. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 193(7), 480–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soper, B. (1999). A comparison of daydream and dream perspectives. College Student Journal, 33(2), 217–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soper, B., Milford, G. E., & Rosenthal, G. T. (1994). Dream perspective: A research note. Journal of Mental Imagery, 18(3–4), 181–182.

  • Sutton, J. (2010). Observer perspective and acentred memory: Some puzzles about point of view in personal memory. Philosophical Studies, 148(1), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-010-9498-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Synofzik, M., Vosgerau, G., & Newen, A. (2008). Beyond the comparator model: A multifactorial two-step account of agency. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(1), 219–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. (2014). Waking, dreaming, being: Self and consciousness in neuroscience, meditation, and philosophy. Newyork: Columbia University Press.

  • Tuominen, J., Stenberg, T., Revonsuo, A., & Valli, K. (2019). Social contents in dreams: An empirical test of the social simulation theory. Consciousness and Cognition, 69, 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2019.01.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss, U., Schermelleh-Engel, K., Windt, J. M., Frenzel, C., & Hobson, J. A. (2013). Measuring consciousness in dreams: The lucidity and consciousness in dreams scale. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(1), 8–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vyse, S. A. (1997). Believing in magic: The psychology of superstition. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, D. M., & Wheatley, T. (1999). Apparent mental causation: Sources of the experience of will. American Psychologist, 54(7), 480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, D. M., Gilbert, D., & Wheatley, T. (2003). The illusion of conscious will. MIT Press.

  • Windt, J. M. (2010). The immersive spatiotemporal hallucination model of dreaming. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 9(2), 295–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windt, J. M. (2013). Reporting dream experience: Why (not) to be skeptical about dream reports [Hypothesis and Theory]. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windt, J. M. (2015). Dreaming : A conceptual framework for philosophy of mind and empirical research. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windt, J. M. (2017). Predictive brains, dreaming selves, sleeping bodies: How the analysis of dream movement can inform a theory of self-and world-simulation in dreams. Synthese, 195(6), 2577–2625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windt, J. M. (2018). Précis of dreaming: A conceptual framework for philosophy of mind and empirical research. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 25(5–6), 6–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windt, J. M., & Metzinger, T. (2007). The philosophy of dreaming and self-consciousness: What happens to the experiential subject during the dream state? In D. B. P. McNamara (Ed.), The new science of dreaming: Volume 3, cultural and theoretical perspectives (pp. 193–247). Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group.

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melanie G. Rosen.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

I, the author of this article, give my consent for the publication of the work submitted.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rosen, M.G. Sleeper Agents: The Sense of Agency Over the Dream Body. Hum Stud 44, 693–719 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-021-09598-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-021-09598-z

Keywords

Navigation