Skip to main content
Log in

From Everyday Science to Science Education: How Science and Technology Studies Inspired Curriculum Design and Classroom Research

  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article illustrates how teachers designed new science learningenvironments and studied teaching and learning within these environments based on their readings of research in science and technology studies conducted from a social-constructivist perspective. Examples of students‘ science-related activities are drawn from a data corpus which includes several hundred hours of videotaped laboratory activities, audiotaped interviews, and student-produced artifacts collected over a period of five years in nearly 30 different science classes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bijker, W.E.: 1987, ‘The Social Construction of Bakelite: Toward a Theory of Invention’, in W.E. Bijker, T.P. Hughes & T.J. Pinch (eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijker, W.E., Hughes, T.P. & Pinch, T.J. (eds.): 1987, The Social Construction of Technological Systems, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. & Wacquant, L.J.D.: 1992, An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookhart Costa, V.: 1993, ‘School Science as a Rite of Passage: A New Frame for Familiar Problems’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30, 649–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S., Collins, A. & Duguid, P.: 1989, ‘Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning’, Educational Researcher 18, 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H.M.: 1982, ‘Tacit Knowledge and Scientific Networks’, in B. Barnes & D. Edge (eds.), Science in Context: Readings in the Sociology of Science, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F.: 1982, ‘Money Tree, Lasagna Bush, Salt and Pepper: Social Construction of Topical Cohesion in a Conversation among Italian Americans’, in D. Tannen (ed.), Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk, Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P.K.: 1991, Three Dialogues on Knowledge, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK and Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H.: 1967, Studies in Ethnomethodology, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H., Lynch, M. & Livingston, E.: 1981, ‘The Work of a Discovering Science Construed with Materials from the Optically Discovered Pulsar’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11, 131–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gooding, D.: 1992, ‘Putting Agency back into Experiment’, in A. Pickering (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, K.: 1991, ‘Flexible Sketches and Inflexible Data Bases: Visual Communication, Conscription Devices, and Boundary Objects in Design Engineering’, Science, Technology & Human Values 16, 448–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, K. & Lynch, M.: 1993, ‘The Mainstreaming of a Molecular Biological Tool: A Case Study of a New Technique’, in G. Button (ed.), Technology in Working Order: Studies of Work, Interaction, and Technology, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K.D.: 1981, The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science, Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K.D. & Amann, K.: 1990, ‘Image Dissection in Natural Scientific Inquiry’, Science, Technology & Human Values 15, 259–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T.S.: 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed., The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B.: 1987, Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B.: 1992, Aramis ou l'Amour des Techniques [Aramis or the Love of Technology], Editions la Découverte, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. & Woolgar, S.: 1979, Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J.: 1988, Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J.: 1993, ‘The Practice of Learning’, in S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (eds.), Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., Murtaugh, M. & de la Rocha, O.: 1984, ‘The Dialectic of Arithmetic in Grocery Shopping’, in B. Rogoff & J. Lave (eds.), Everyday Cognition: Its Development in Social Context, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. & Wenger, E.: 1991, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M.: 1985, Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science: A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Laboratory, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M. & Woolgar, S. (eds.): 1990, Representation in Scientific Practice, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, M.K., Roth, W.-M., Boutonné, S. & Woszczyna, C.: 1995, ‘The Transformation of Individual and Collective Knowledge in Elementary Science Classrooms that are Organized as Knowledge-Building Communities’, Research in Science Education 25, 163–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulkay, M. & Gilbert, G.N.: 1986, ‘Replication and Mere Replication’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 16, 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinch, T.J. & Bijker, W.E.: 1987, ‘The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other’, in W.E. Bijker, T.P. Hughes & T.J. Pinch (eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R.: 1989, Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M.: 1993, ‘Problem-Centered Learning or the Integration of Mathematics and Science in a Constructivist Laboratory: A Case Study’, School Science and Mathematics 93, 113–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M.: 1994, ‘Experimenting in a Constructivist High School Physics Laboratory’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 31, 197–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M.: 1995, ‘The Co-Evolution of Situated Language and Physics Knowing’, Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Roth, W.-M. & Bowon, G.M.: 1993, ‘An Investigation of Problem Solving in the Context of a Grade 8 Open-Inquiry Science Program’, The Journal of the Learning Sciences 3, 165–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. & Bowen, G.M.: 1994, ‘Mathematization of Experience in a Grade 8 Open-Inquiry Environment: An Introduction to the Representational Practices of Science’, Journal of Research in Science Feaching 31, 293–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. & Bowen, G.M.: 1995, ‘Knowing and Interacting: A Study of Culture, Practices, and Resources in a Grade 8 Open-Inquiry Science Classroom Guided by a Cognitive Apprenticeship Metaphor’, Cognition and Instruction 13, 73–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. & Roychoudhury, A.: 1992, ‘The Social Construction of Scientific Concepts or the Concept Map as Conscription Device and Tool for Social Thinking in High School Science’, Science Education 76, 531–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. & Roychoudhury, A.: 1993, ‘The Development of Science Process Skills in Authentic Contexts’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30, 127–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxe, G. B.: 1991, Culture and Cognitive Development: Studies in Mathematical Understanding, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D.A.: 1983, The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A.: 1987, Educating the Reflective Practitioner, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scrihner, S.: 1986, ‘Thinking in Action: Some Characteristics of Practical Thought’, in R.J. Stemberg & R.K. Wagner (eds.), Practical Intelligence Nature and Origins of Competence in the Everyday World, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slezak, P.: 1993a, ‘Sociology of Scientific Knowledge and Scientific Education’, Part I, Science & Education 3, 265–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slezak, P.: 1993b, ‘Sociology of Scientific Knowledge and Scientific Education’, Part 2: ‘Laboratory Life Under the Microscope’, Science & Education 3, 329–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørenson, K.H. & Levold, N.: 1992, ‘Tacit Networks, Heterogeneous Engineers, and Embodied Technology’, Science, Technology & Human Values 17, 13–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S.L. & Griesemer, J.R.: 1989, ‘Institutional Ecology “Translations” and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39’, Social Studies of Science 19, 387–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A.L.: 1987, Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L.A.: 1987, Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. & Papert, S.: 1991, ‘Episternological Pluralism and the Revaluation of the Concrete’, in I. Harel & S. Papert (eds.), Constructionism: Research Reports and Essays 1985–1990, Ablex, Norwood, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1968, Philosophical Investigations, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolgar, S.: 1990, ‘Time and Documents in Researcher Interaction: Some Ways of Making out what is Happening in Experimental Science’, in M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (eds.), Representation in Scientific Practice, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenzen, M. & Restivo, S.: 1982, ‘The Mysterious Morphology of Immiscible Liquids: A Study of Scientific Practice’, Social Science Information 21, 447–473.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roth, WM. From Everyday Science to Science Education: How Science and Technology Studies Inspired Curriculum Design and Classroom Research. Science & Education 6, 373–396 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017909815902

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017909815902

Keywords

Navigation