Skip to main content

Genome Editing and the Transgression of the Species Boundary

Does Species Affiliation Have an Ethical Relevance?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Between Moral Hazard and Legal Uncertainty

Abstract

One of the main fields of research in genome editing is the manufacture of transgenic organisms. If this includes genetically human components, then we must not only ask whether such techniques should be allowed, but also what the moral status of “cross species beings” with a genetically “human” component would be and whether the possibility to manufacture them affects the validity of bioethical arguments from species affiliation. In my chapter I want to show that the two latter questions are less dramatic than it might seem, because most, if not all transgenic organisms are not real “interspecies beings”, but rather belong to one of the original species, or constitute a new species. As for the first question, possible epistemic uncertainties about the status of transgenic organisms call for a precautionary approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Fichte, Johann G. 2000. Foundations of Natural Right According to the Principles of the Wissenschaftslehre. Neuhouser, Frederick (ed.). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, Georg W. F. 1977. Phenomenology of Spirit, Inwood, Michael (ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, Ernst. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Jung, Joachim. 2017. Der Mensch im Schwein. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, January 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, Wolfgang. 2012. Open Minds. The Social Making of Agency and Intentionality. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, Richard A. 2010. The Species Problem: A Philosophical Analysis. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweidler, Walter. 2008. Ethische Neutralität und weltanschauliche Souveränität des Staates. In Begründung von Menschenwürde und Menschenrechten, Härle, Wilfried, and Bernhard Vogel (eds.), 169–187. Freiburg: Alber

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaemann, Robert. 2000. Happiness and Benevolence. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaemann, Robert. 2006. Persons. The Difference between ‘Someone’ and ‘Something’. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Michael. 2008. Life and Action: Elementary Structures of Practice and Practical Thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Rothhaar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rothhaar, M. (2018). Genome Editing and the Transgression of the Species Boundary. In: Braun, M., Schickl, H., Dabrock, P. (eds) Between Moral Hazard and Legal Uncertainty. Technikzukünfte, Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft / Futures of Technology, Science and Society. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22660-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics