Abstract
In Making Sense of Life, Keller emphasizes several differences between biology and physics. Her analysis focuses on significant ways in which modelling practices in some areas of biology, especially developmental biology, differ from those of the physical sciences. She suggests that natural models and modelling by homology play a central role in the former but not the latter. In this paper, I focus instead on those practices that are importantly similar, from the point of view of epistemology and cognitive science. I argue that concrete and abstract models are significant in both disciplines, that there are shared selection criteria for models in physics and biology, e.g. familiarity, and that modelling often occurs in a similar fashion.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander R.M. (1999) Engineering approaches to chewing and digestion. Science Progress 82: 171–184
Baker, A. (2004). Simplicity. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (winter edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2004/entries/simplicity/
Blanchette I., Dunbar K. (2000) How analogies are generated: The roles of structural and superficial similarity. Memory & Cognition 28: 108–124
Blanchette I., Dunbar K. (2001) Analogy use in naturalistic settings: The influence of audience, emotion, and goals. Memory and Cognition 29: 730–735
Clagett M. (1959) The science of mechanics in the middle ages. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison
Collins A., Gentner D. (1987) How people construct mental models. In: Holland D., Quinn N. (eds) Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 243–265
Da Costa N.C.A., French S.R.D. (2003) Science and partial truth: A unitary approach to models and reasoning in science. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Duhem, P. M. M. (1991). The aim and structure of physical theory (P. P. Wiener, Trans.). Princeton: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1906)
Dunbar K.N. (2002) Understanding the role of cognition in science: The science as category framework. In: Carruthers P., Stich S., Siegal M. (eds) The cognitive basis of science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 154–170
Ferguson E.S. (1977) The mind’s eye: Non-verbal thought in technology. Science 197(4306): 827–836
Galison P. (1997) Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Gentner D. (1983) Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science 7: 155–170
Gentner D., Gentner D.R. (1983) Flowing waters or teeming crowds: Mental models of electricity. In: Gentner D., Stevens A. (eds) Mental models. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum
Gooding D. (1990) Experiment and the making of meaning: Human agency in scientific observation and experiment. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Hawkins R.J., McLeish T.C.B. (2004) Coarse grained model of entropic allostery. Physical Review Letters 93: 098104
Hille B. (1984) Ionic channels of excitable membranes. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA
Keller E.F. (2002) Making sense of life: Explaining biological development with models, metaphors, and machines. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Keller E.F. (2007) A clash of two cultures. Nature 445(5): 603
Kohler R.E. (1994) Lords of the fly: Drosophila genetics and the experimental life. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Kuhn T.S. (1996) The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed). University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Laudan, L. (1990). Demystifying underdetermination. In C. W. Savage (Ed.), Scientific theories, Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (Vol. XIV, pp. 267–297). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Leduc S. (1911) The mechanism of life (W. D. Butcher, Trans.). Heinemann, London
Nagaoka H. (1904) Kinetics of a system of particles illustrating the line and the band spectrum and the phenomena of radioactivity. Philosophical Magazine Sixth Series 7: 445–455
Nersessian N.J. (1988) Reasoning from imagery and analogy in scientific concept formation. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1: 41–47
Nersessian N.J. (2002) The cognitive basis of model-based reasoning in science. In: Carruthers P., Stich S., Siegal M. (eds) The cognitive basis of science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 133–153
Polya G. (1973) Mathematics and plausible reasoning (Vol. 1). Princeton University Press, Princeton
Rader K.A. (1998) The mouse people: Murine genetics at the Bussey institution, 1909–1936. Journal of the History of Biology 31: 327–354
Rowbottom, D. P. (Forthcoming). Approximations, idealizations, and “experiments” at the physics–biology interface. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences.
Smith, A. (1980). The principles which lead and direct philosophical enquiry: Illustrated by the history of astronomy. In W. P. D. Wightman & J. C. Bryce (Eds.), Vol. III of the Glasgow edition of the works and correspondence of Adam Smith (pp. 31–129). Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. Reprinted 1982. (Original work published 1795)
Sober E. (1975) Simplicity. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Swinburne R. (1997) Simplicity as evidence for truth. Marquette University Press, Milwaukee
Thompson D.W. (1942) On growth and form. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Thornburn W. (1918) The myth of Occam’s Razor. Mind 27: 345–353
Trumpler M. (1997) Converging images: Techniques of intervention and forms of representation of sodium-channel proteins in nerve cell membranes. Journal of the History of Biology 30: 55–89
Tversky B. (2002) Spatial schemas in depictions. In: Gattis M. (eds) Spatial schemas and abstract thought. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 79–112
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rowbottom, D.P. Models in Biology and Physics: What’s the Difference?. Found Sci 14, 281–294 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-009-9160-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-009-9160-4