Skip to main content

The Role of Making and Taking in Sustainability Transitions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Economies for Sustainability

Part of the book series: Ethical Economy ((SEEP,volume 59))

  • 385 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter introduces an ecological economic understanding of the sustainability concept, which combines an emphasis on keeping within environmental limits with an ethical call to fulfil the basic needs of all humans. With a particular focus on the distributional aspects of sustainability, the chapter provides a framework for understanding and discussing social provisioning processes. Provisioning is about transforming natural resources into a total of products and services that is referred to as the real cake. The framework distinguishes between the provisioning of the real cake and the appropriation of the cake, between makers and takers, because both aspects are key to sustainability. The main message is that the transformation of appropriation processes should play a much more important role in sustainability transitions, which requires more debate about who the makers and takers are in modern societies. Although ownership in itself does not contribute anything to the provisioning of the cake, appropriation is closely related to property rights, which form the basis of large social inequalities. The chapter provides a critical discussion of the narratives that legitimise these inequalities and suggests counter narratives. In conclusion, the need for new narratives is related to the idea of social tipping points.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Including all humans here involves taking an ethical position that is not shared by everyone. As Hardin’s lifeboat ethics illustrate, a world of scarcity for some leads to the alternative position that countries or particular social groups should fight for their own interests at the expense of others (Hardin, 1974).

References

  • Bezemer, D., & Hudson, M. (2016). Finance is not the economy: Reviving the conceptual distinction. Journal of Economic Issues, 50(3), 745–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birch, K. (2017). Rethinking value in the bio-economy: Finance, assetization, and the management of value. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 42(3), 460–490. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243916661633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaug, M. (1997). Economic theory in retrospect (5th ed.). Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. (2011). 23 things they don’t tell you about capitalism. Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christophers, B. (2011). Making finance productive. Economy and Society, 40(1), 112–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2011.529337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R. (Ed.). (1991). Ecological economics. The science and management of sustainability. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle, D. (2014). GDP: A brief but affectionate history. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, G. (Ed.). (2005). Financialization and the world economy. Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, J., & Kubiszewski, I. (2015). The economics of information in a post-carbon economy. In P. W. Elliott & D. H. Hepting (Eds.), Free knowledge. Confronting the commodification of human discovery (pp. 199–222). University of Regina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2008). Diverse economies: Performative practices for ‘other worlds’. Progress in Human Geography, 32(5), 613–632. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508090821

  • Gibson-Graham, J. K., Cameron, J., & Healy, S. (2013). Take Back the economy. An ethical guide for transforming our communities. University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, I. (2017). Heat, greed and human need. Climate change, capitalism and sustainable wellbeing. Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gowdy, J., & Erickson, J. D. (2005). The approach of ecological economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 29, 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graeber, D. (2018). Bullshit jobs: A theory. Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberl, H., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Krausmann, F., Martinez-Alier, J., & Winiwarter, V. (2011). A socio-metabolic transition towards sustainability? Challenges for another great transformation. Sustainable Development, 19(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1974). Living on a lifeboat. Bioscience, 24(10), 561–568. https://doi.org/10.2307/1296629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, B. (2016). Capital without borders. Wealth managers and the one percent. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornborg, A. (2019a). The money-energy-technology complex and ecological marxism: Rethinking the concept of “use-value” to extend our understanding of unequal exchange, part 1. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 30(3), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2018.1440614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornborg, A. (2019b). The money-energy-technology complex and ecological marxism: Rethinking the concept of “use-value” to extend our understanding of unequal exchange, part 2. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 30(4), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2018.1464212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornborg, A., McNeill, J. R., & Martinez-Alier, J. (Eds.). (2007). Rethinking environmental history. World-system history and global environmental change. AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallis, G. (2018). Degrowth. Agenda Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kapp, K. W. (1976). The nature and significance of institutional economics. Kyklos, 29(2), 209–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Alier, J. (1987). Ecological economics. Energy, environment and society. Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzucato, M. (2011). The entrepreneurial state. Demos.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzucato, M. (2018). The value of everything. Making and taking in the global economy. Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (2014). Financialization and the multinational corporation. Transfer, 20(2), 183–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Neill, D. W., Fanning, A. L., Lamb, W. F., & Steinberger, J. K. (2018). A good life for all within planetary boundaries. Nature Sustainability, 1(2), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut economics. Seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. Random House Business Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Røpke, I. (1999). Prices are not worth much. Ecological Economics, 29(1), 45–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Røpke, I. (2005). Trends in the development of ecological economics from the late 1980s to the early 2000s. Ecological Economics, 55(2), 262–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Røpke, I. (2020). Econ 101—In need of a sustainability transition. Ecological Economics, 169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106515

  • Sayer, A. (2015). Why we can’t afford the rich. Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schor, J. B. (2005). Prices and quantities: Unsustainable consumption and the global economy. Ecological Economics, 55(3), 309–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seabrooke, L., & Wigan, D. (2017). The governance of global wealth chains. Review of International Political Economy: Special Section: Global Wealth Chains, 24(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2016.1268189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The dynamics of social practice. Everyday life and how it changes. Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spash, C. L. (2020). A tale of three paradigms: Realising the revolutionary potential of ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 169, 106518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106518

  • Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., … Sörlin, S. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223), 1259855. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stratford, B. (2020). The threat of rent extraction in a resource-constrained future. Ecological Economics, 169, 106524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tainter, J. A. (1988). The collapse of complex societies. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. K. (1999). Environmental and ecological economics perspectives. In J. C. J. M. van den Bergh (Ed.), Handbook of environmental and resource economics (pp. 1001–1033). Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, A. (2016). Between debt and the devil. Money, credit, and fixing global finance. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (1999). An overview of environmental and resource economics. In J. C. J. M. van den Bergh (Ed.), Handbook of environmental and resource economics (pp. 3–31). Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Inge Røpke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Røpke, I. (2022). The Role of Making and Taking in Sustainability Transitions. In: Langergaard, L.L. (eds) New Economies for Sustainability. Ethical Economy, vol 59. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81743-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics