Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Counter-intuitivity and the method of analysis

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. Meaning and Necessity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1947).

  2. Actually, Carnap reveals his awareness of this a little further on in the paragraph from which I quoted.

  3. Langford calls it the “analysans” in “The Notion of Analysis in Moore's Philosophy,”The Philosophy of G. E. Moore, P. A. Schilpp, ed. (Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1942).

  4. “On the Simplicity of Ideas,”Journal of Symbolic Logic, 8(4):110.

  5. “Studies in the Logic of Explanation,”Philosophy of Science, 15(2):162 (April 1948).

  6. Ibid., p. 154.

  7. Ibid., p. 152.

  8. Contemporary British Philosophy, J. H. Muirheud, ed. (London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1925), pp. 193–223passim.

    Google Scholar 

  9. “On the Simplicity of Ideas,”Journal of Symbolic Logic, p. 108.

  10. Contemporary British Philosophy, p. 198.

  11. Meaning and Necessity, p. 8.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Washington University, Washington

    Richard Rudner

Authors
  1. Richard Rudner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rudner, R. Counter-intuitivity and the method of analysis. Philos Stud 1, 83–89 (1950). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02199410

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02199410

Search

Navigation