Notes
Meaning and Necessity (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1947).
Actually, Carnap reveals his awareness of this a little further on in the paragraph from which I quoted.
Langford calls it the “analysans” in “The Notion of Analysis in Moore's Philosophy,”The Philosophy of G. E. Moore, P. A. Schilpp, ed. (Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press, 1942).
“On the Simplicity of Ideas,”Journal of Symbolic Logic, 8(4):110.
“Studies in the Logic of Explanation,”Philosophy of Science, 15(2):162 (April 1948).
Ibid., p. 154.
Ibid., p. 152.
Contemporary British Philosophy, J. H. Muirheud, ed. (London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1925), pp. 193–223passim.
“On the Simplicity of Ideas,”Journal of Symbolic Logic, p. 108.
Contemporary British Philosophy, p. 198.
Meaning and Necessity, p. 8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rudner, R. Counter-intuitivity and the method of analysis. Philos Stud 1, 83–89 (1950). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02199410
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02199410