Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Locke on Land and Labor

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Arnold, N.S. (1985): ‘Capitalists and the Ethics of Contribution’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 15, 87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, N.S. (1987): ‘Why Profits are Deserved’, Ethics 97, 387–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, L.C. (1976): ‘The Labor Theory of Property Acquisition’, Journal of Philosophy 73, 653–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J.D. (1997): ‘Locke's Theory of Original Appropriation and the Right of Settlement in Iroquois Territory’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 27, 311–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G.A. (1995): ‘Marx and Locke on Land and Labour’, in Cohen (ed.), Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality (pp. 165–194), Cambridge.

  • Ellerman, D.P. (1985): ‘On the Labor Theory of Property’, Philosophical Forum 16, 293–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebovics, H. (1986): ‘The Uses of American in Locke's Second Treatise of Government’, Journal of the History of Ideas 5, 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. (1980): Second Treatise of Government, C.B. Macpherson (ed.), Hackett.

  • Mautner, T. (1982): ‘Locke on Original Appropriation’, American Philosophical Quarterly 19, 259–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narveson, J. (1998): ‘Libertarianism vs. Marxism: Reflections on G.A. Cohen's Self-Ownership, Freedom and Equality’, Journal of Ethics 2, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narveson, J. (1999): ‘Property Rights: Original Acquisition and Lockean Provisos’, Public Affairs Quarterly 13, 205–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. (1974): Anarchy, State, and Utopia, Basic Books.

  • Olivecrona, K. (1974): ‘Locke's Theory of Appropriation’, Philosophical Quarterly 24, 220–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, L. (1956): ‘I, Pencil: My Family Tree as told by Leonard E. Read’, The Foreman.

  • Sartorius, R. (1984): ‘Persons and Property’, in R. Frey (ed.), Utility and Rights (pp. 196–214), University of Minnesota Press.

  • Schmidtz, D. (1990): ‘When is Original Appropriation Required?’, Monist 73, 504–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidtz, D. (1998): ‘Why Isn't Everyone Destitute?’, in D. Schmidtz and R.E. Goodin (eds.), Social Welfare and Individual Responsibility: For and Against (pp. 24–43), Cambridge.

  • Shrader-Frechette, K. (1993): ‘Locke and Limits on Land Ownership’, Journal of the History of Ideas 54, 201–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J.J. (1976): ‘PropertyAcquisition’, Journal of Philosophy 73, 664–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H. (1975): ‘Distributive Justice, Welfare Economics, and the Theory of Fairness’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 4, 223–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winfrey, J.C. (1981): ‘Charity versus Justice in Locke's Theory of Property’, Journal of the History of Ideas 42, 423–438.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, Wichita State Unviersity, Wichita, KS, 67260-0001, USA

    Daniel Russell

Authors
  1. Daniel Russell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Russell, D. Locke on Land and Labor. Philosophical Studies 117, 303–325 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHIL.0000014529.01097.20

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHIL.0000014529.01097.20

Search

Navigation