Abstract
Argument, in any full sense of the word, needs resources and assumptions that postmodernism does not provide. Postmodernism is not a phenomenon that emerged ‘after modernism,’ as it were, to replace it; postmodernism is just an ultimate expression of the nihilistic tendencies of modernism, tendencies which were present from its beginning and have continued to the present. A radical critique of modernism undercuts postmodernism as well and clears the way for a revival of realist foundations for argument and rhetoric.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Derrida, J.: 1972, ‘Les Fins de L'Homme.’Marges de la Philosophie. Paris: Editions de Minuit.
Foucault, M.: 1973,Les Mots et Les Choses. Paris: Gallimard.
Jameson, F.: 1984, ‘Postmodernism or the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism,’New Left Review, 149, 53–78. Useful description of postmodernism even for those who will not buy the connection with capitalism.
Kearney, R.: 1987,The Wake of Imagination: Ideas of Creativity in Western Culture. London: Hutchinson.
Lévi-Strauss, C.: 1962,La Pensée Sauvage. Paris: Plon.
Lyotard, J.: 1979,La Condition Postmoderne. Paris: Editions de Minuit.
—: 1986,Le Postmoderne — Expliqué aux Enfants. Paris: Galile.
Perelman, C.: 1962,The New Rhetoric, University of Nortre Dame.
Rorty, R.: 1979,Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton University.
Russman, T. A.: 1986,A Prospectus for the Triumph of Realism. Macon, GA: Mercer University.
Warhol, A.: 1975,The Philosophy of Andy Warhol, London: Cassell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Russman, T.A. Postmodernism and the parody of argument. Argumentation 9, 123–135 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00733105
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00733105