Skip to main content
Log in

Woodger on genetics a critical evaluation

  • Published:
Acta Biotheoretica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A critical analysis of Woodger's work on formal logic in biology, especially genetics, reveals that the claim for the value of such methods in genetics is misplaced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  • Achinstein, P. (1968). Concepts of science.—Baltimore, The Johns Hopkin's Press, xiii + 266 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, R. B. (1953). Scientific explanation.—Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, x + 374 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R. (1958). Introduction to symbolic logic and its applications.—New York, Dover, xiv + 241 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, Th. (1951). Genetics and the origin of species. 3rd ed.—New York, Columbia, xvi + 364 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, W. (1964). Elementary genetics. 2nd ed.—London, Macmillan, vi + 198 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C. G. (1958). The theoretician's dilemma: A study in the logic of theory construction. In:H. Feigl, M. Scriven, &G. Maxwell, Eds. Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science2.—Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press. Reprinted with changes in: C. G.Hempel (1965). Aspects of scientific explanation.-New York, Macmillan, p. 173–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions.—Chicago, University of Chicago Press, xii + 210 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyburg, H. E. (1968). Philosophy of science: A formal approach.—New York, Macmillan, xi + 332 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przelecki, M. (1964). On the concept of genotype. In:J. R. Gregg &F. T. C. Harris, Eds. Form and strategy in science.—Dordrecht, Reidel, p. 315–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, M. (1971). The matter of life: Philosophical problems of biology.—New Haven, Yale University Press, xi + 258 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. G. (1953). The principles of animal taxonomy.—New York, Columbia University Press, xii + 247 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. J. C. (1953). Theory construction. In:A. G. N. Flew, Ed. Logic and language, second series.—Oxford, Blackwell, p. 222–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, (1963). Philosophy and scientific realism.—London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, viii + 160 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, M. (1966). Theory and observation.—Brit. J. Phil. Science,17, p. 1–20, p. 89–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, D. (1967). Identity and spatio-temporal continuity.—Oxford, Blackwell, viii + 83 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. B. (1970). Deducing the consequences of evolution: A mathematical model.—J. theor. Biol.29, p. 343–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodger, J. H. (1937). The axiomatic method in biology.—Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, x + 174 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, (1939). The technique of theory construction.—Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 81 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, (1952). Biology and language.—Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, xiii + 364 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, (1959). Studies in the foundations of genetics. In:Henkin, Suppes &Tarski. The axiomatic method.—Amsterdam, North Holland Publ. Comp., p. 408–28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruse, M. Woodger on genetics a critical evaluation. Acta Biotheor 24, 1–13 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01556736

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01556736

Keywords

Navigation