Skip to main content
Log in

Tapping the Source of Moral Approbation: The Moral Referent Group

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A recent contribution to the moral decision-making literature argues that individuals' moral behavior is partially shaped by the amount of moral approbation they expect to receive from their moral referent groups (Jones and Ryan, 1997). This paper examines the nature and content of these previously underexamined sources of moral guidance. In an open-ended empirical test of undergraduate business students (n = 369), we found that 1) significant differences exist between individuals' moral referent groups and work-related referent groups, 2) females were more likely than males to include themselves in their moral referent groups, 3) females were more likely than males to be designated as moral referents, and 4) females were more likely to be included in moral referent groups than in work-related referent groups. The paper also includes a general description of the membership of these business subjects' moral referent groups and presents a variety of suggestions for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blasi, A.: 1984, ‘Moral Identity: Its Role in Moral Functioning', in W. M. Kurtines and J. L. Gewirtz (eds.), Morality, Moral Behavior, and Moral Development ( John Wiley and Sons, New York), pp. 128–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, R. F.: 1997, ‘Long-term Retest Reliability of Interpersonal Dependency Inventory Scores in College Students,' Assessment 4, 359–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, R. F., S. C. Rossner and E. L. Hill: 1994, ‘Retest Reliability of Scores on Objective and Projective Measures of Dependency: Relationship to Life Events and Interest Interval’, Journal of Personality Assessment 62, 398–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U.: 1962, ‘The Role of Age, Sex, Class, and Culture in Studies of Moral Development,' in S. W. Cook (ed.), Review of Recent Research Bearing on Religious and Character Formation (Religious Education Association, New York), pp. S3-S17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B. P.: 1962, ‘The Process of Choosing a Reference Group', in J. H. Criswell, H. Solomon and P. Suppes (eds.), Mathematical Methods in Small Group Processes (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA), pp. 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K.: 1966, ‘The Significant Others of a College Population’, Sociological Quarterly 7, 298–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. L.: 1959, Edwards Personal Preference Schedule (Manual) (Psychology Corporation, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S.: 1973, ‘The Self-concept Revisited: Or a Theory of a Theory’, American Psychologist 28(5), 404–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke, G. R., D. F. Crown and D. F. Spake: 1997, ‘Gender Differences in Ethical Perceptions of Business Practices: A Social Role Theory Perspective’, Journal of Applied Psychology 82, 920–934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, S. H., M. A. Bumpus, J. E. Logan and J. R. Ciesla: 1997, ‘Re-examining the Influence of Individual Values on Ethical Decision Making’, Journal of Business Ethics 16, 1319–1329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, R. M.: 1983, The Psychodynamic Foundations of Morality (S. Karger, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschfeld, R. M., G. L. Klerman, H. G. Gough, J. Barrett, S. J. Korchin and P. Chodoff: 1977, ‘A Measure of Interpersonal Dependency’, Journal of Personality Assessment 41, 610–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, M.: 1979, ‘Development of Moral Thought, Feeling, and Behavior’, American Psychologist 34: 958–966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, H. H.: 1980/1942, The Psychology of Status (New York Times Company, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M. and L. V. Ryan: 1997, ‘The Link between Ethical Judgment and Action in Organizations: A Moral Approbation Approach’, Organization Science 8, 663–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M. and L. V. Ryan: 1998, ‘The Effect of Organizational Forces on Individual Morality: Judgment, Moral Approbation, and Behavior’, Business Ethics Quarterly 8, 431–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, H. H.: 1952, ‘Two Functions of Reference Groups', in G. E. Swanson, T. M. Newcomb, and E. L. Hartley (eds.), Readings in Social Psychology (Henry Holt, New York), pp. 410–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1969, ‘Stage and Sequence: The Cognitive-developmental Approach to Socialization', in D. A. Goslin (ed.), Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research (Rand McNally, Chicago), pp. 347–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, C. T. and M. L. Ambrose: 1992, ‘Personal and Situational Determinants of Referent Choice’, Academy of Management Review 17, 212–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, R. R.: 1989, ‘Individual and Contextual Influences on Group Identification’, Social Psychology Quarterly 52(3), 220–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malinowski, C. and K. A. Berger: 1996, ‘Undergraduate Student Attitudes about Hypothetical Marketing Dilemmas’, Journal of Business Ethics 15, 525–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K.: 1957, Social Theory and Social Structure (Free Press, Glencoe, IL).

    Google Scholar 

  • Murgatroyd, D. and E. I. Gavurin: 1975, ‘Comparisons of Edwards Personal Preference Schedule Norms with Recent College Samples’, Journal of Psychology 91, 71–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, A.: 1997, ‘Personality and Help Seeking: Autonomous versus Dependent Seeking of Help', in G. R. Pierce, B. Lakey, I. G. Sarason and B. R. Sarason (eds.), Sourcebook of Social Support and Personality (Plenum Press, New York), pp. 379–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, T. M.: 1950, Social Psychology (Dryden Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, D. M. and A. M. Gibson: 1990, ‘Methodology in Business Ethics Research: A Review and Critical Assessment’, Journal of Business Ethics 9, 457–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R.: 1986, Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory (Praeger, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, L. V. and C. M. Riordan: 2000, ‘The Development of a Measure of Desired Moral Approbation’, Educational and Psychological Measurement 60, 448–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, D. L. and N. Bowman-Upton: 1990, ‘Female and Male Entrepreneurs: Psychological Characteristics and Their Role in Gender-related Discrimination’, Journal of Business Venturing 5, 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, P. P.: 1998, ‘Who are Employees' Social Referents? Using a Network Perspective to Determine Referent Others’, Academy of Management Journal 41, 249–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoma, S. J. and J. R. Rest: 1986, ‘Moral Judgment, Behavior, Decision Making, and Attitudes', in J. R. Rest (ed.), Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory (Praeger, New York), pp. 133–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorson, J. A. and F. C. Powell: 1992, ‘Vagaries of College Norms for the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule’, Psychological Reports 70, 943–946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, A. S.: 1988, ‘On the Uses of Psychological Theory and Research in the Process of Ethical Inquiry’, Psychological Bulletin 103(3), 283–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, F. A.: 1996a, ‘Sources of Influence in Moral Thought: The New Moral Authority Scale’, Journal of Moral Education 25(4), 421–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, F. A.: 1996b, ‘Family Processes as Predictors of Adolescents' Preferences for Ascribed Sources of Moral Authority: A Proposed Model’, Adolescence 31(121), 133–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. A.: 1970, ‘Reference Groups: A Review and Commentary’, Sociological Quarterly 11, 545–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. W. and L. R. Ferguson: 1979, ‘Developmental Changes through Adolescence in the Spontaneous Nomination of Reference Groups as a Function of Decision Content’, Journal of Youth and Adolescence 8(2), 239–252.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ryan, L.V., Ciavarella, M.A. Tapping the Source of Moral Approbation: The Moral Referent Group. Journal of Business Ethics 38, 179–192 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015729231274

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015729231274

Navigation