Abstract
In this article, the authors try to review the Paris-Match cover page (No. 326 from 1955) analyzed by Roland Barthes and introduces a new model of analyzing sign system from a new semiotic approach based on the new definition of the context. This research is based on three layers of the context and shows that understanding the cover page of a magazine or any other kind of text is not only absolute but also somehow relative due to the different background knowledge of the audience. This means that human sees the Context A, or what is designed, in the situation of Context B, or situational context, and interpret based on their Context C, or background knowledge of the audience.
References
Barthes, Roland. 1972. Mythologies. New York: The Noonday Press.Search in Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émilie. 1981. Sémiologie de la langue. Semiotica 1(1). 1–12.10.1515/semi.1969.1.1.1Search in Google Scholar
Bouzida, Feyrouz. 2014. The semiology analysis in media studies: Roland Barthes’ approach. Paper presented at International conference on social sciences and humanities, Istanbul, 8–10 September.Search in Google Scholar
Chandler, Daniel. 2007 [2001]. Semiotics: The basics, 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203014936Search in Google Scholar
Eco, U. 1981. The theory of signs and the role of the reader. Bulletin of the Midwest Modern Language Association 14(1). 35–47.10.2307/1314865Search in Google Scholar
Fiske, John & John Hartley. 2003. Reading television. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203356623Search in Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1978. Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Search in Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1989 [1985]. Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1971 [1967]. Linguistics in relation to other sciences. In Gordon H. Fairbanks (ed.), Selected writings II: Word and language, 655–696. The Hague: Mouton.10.1515/9783110873269.655Search in Google Scholar
Kimmelman, Michael., 2008. For blacks in France, Obama’s rise is reason to rejoice, and to hope. New York Timeshttp://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/17/arts/17abroad.html?_r=0 (accessed 10 January 2016).Search in Google Scholar
Konan, Aude. 2015. Why black people in France are still invisible. https://mediadiversified.org/2015/05/12/why-black-people-in-france-are-still-invisible (accessed 11 January 2016).Search in Google Scholar
Langer, Susanne K. 1951 [1942]. Philosophy in a new key: A study in the symbolism of reason, rite, and art. New York: Mentor.Search in Google Scholar
Safavi, Koorosh. 2015. An introduction to literary semiotic. Tehran: Elmi.Search in Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1975 [1916]. In Charles Bally, Albert Sechehaye & Albert Riedlinger (eds.), Course de Linguistique Générale. Paris: Payot.Search in Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef. 1987. Pragmatics as a theory of linguistic adaptation. Antwerp: International Pragmatic Association.Search in Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. 1997 [1941]. Prehistory of the development of written language. In R. W. Rieber (ed.), M. J. Hall (trans.), The history of the development of higher mental functions, Vol.4, (L. S. The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky). New York: Plenum Press.Search in Google Scholar
Ward, Matthew O., Georges Grinstein & Daniel Keim. 2015. Interactive data visualization: Foundations, techniques, and applications, 2nd edn. New York: Taylor & Francis.10.1201/b18379Search in Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. & J. A. Bivens. 1992. The social origins of individual mental functioning: Alternatives and perspectives. Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition 14(2). 35–44.Search in Google Scholar
Xu, Xiaohui. 2013. Research on the application of context theory in vocabulary study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 3(6). 1059–1064.10.4304/tpls.3.6.1059-1064Search in Google Scholar
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
