Abstract
This paper presents an introductory overview of the main issues that the digitalisation of industrial enterprises known as Industry 4.0 raises for social sciences. First, it will show that this technological transition—which, however, is unfinished and is seen to be in continuity with the so-called “third industrial revolution”—cannot be interpreted with reference to a deterministic approach. It can be analysed more usefully as a range of decisions affecting the industrial policies of national states, the conception and design of machines, their adoption in production processes and finally their use by operators. Second, certain aspects of Industry 4.0 of special concern in terms of organisation of work processes will be analysed on various scales (from inter-company transactions to the specific tasks of individual workers). Finally, we will explain various hypotheses that social and economic research is developing with regard to the new technologies’ controversial effects on employment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Consider, for example, the case of Nokia, a former mobile phone leader, which–shaken by the “smartphone revolution”, i.e. a disruptive transformation of the mobile phone market by hyper-capitalised companies such as Google and Apple – had to downsize its field of action and competitive positioning, announcing in 2016 a three-year staff reduction plan affecting 10-15,000 workers. It is interesting to note that in order to avoid analogous failures, a consortium of the main German car manufacturers in 2015 acquired the Nokia division of navigation devices, thus trying to gain control of activities that have become essential in the mobility market.
For example, the interventions carried out by a machine operator based on his experience can be tracked and cross-analyzed together with machine self-diagnostic data. Similarly, three radio transmitters and one accelerometer can track the path variations, accelerations and decelerations operated by a trolley driver supplying workstations. Most of the times, such manoeuvres and adjustments – inspired and guided by the logic of practice in accordance with contingent conditions – are irreflexive and can be hardly explained by the workers themselves, but their function can be inferred and made explicit by the analysis of (big) data. Knowledge made explicit can be later codified and used for programming “intelligent” self-driving robots.
References
Acemoglu D, Autor D (2010) Skills, tasks, and technologies: implications for employment and earnings. In: Ashenfelter O, Card D (eds) Handbook of labor economico, vol 4B. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1043–1171
Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2016) The race between machine and man: implications of technology for growth, factor shares and employment, NBER working paper no. 22252. http://www.nber.org/papers/w22252
Acemoglu D, Restrepo P (2017) Robots and jobs: evidence from US labor market, NBER working paper no. 23285. http://www.nber.org/papers/w23285
Arntz MT, Gregory and Zierahn U (2016) The risk of automation for jobs in OECD countries: a comparative analysis, OECD social, employment and migration working papers, no. 189, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jlz9h56dvq7-en
Beck U (2013) German Europe. Polity, Cambridge
Benasayag M (2016) Cerveau augmenté, homme diminué. La Découverte, Paris
Berta G (2014) Produzione intelligente. Un viaggio nelle nuove fabbriche, Einaudi, Torino
Boltanski L, Esquerre A (2016) L’économie de l’enrichissement et ses effets sociaux, Teoria Politica, nuova serie, annali VI, pp 289–306
Boston Consulting Group (2015a) Industry 4.0. The future of productivity and growth in manufacturing industries. http://www.zvw.de/media.media.72e472fb-1698-4a15-8858-344351c8902f.original.pdf
Boston Consulting Group (2015b) Man and machine in industry 4.0. https://www.bcgperspectives.com/content/articles/technology-business-transformation-engineered-products-infrastructure-man-machine-industry-4/?chapter=3#chapter3
Bower JL, Christensen CM (1995) Disruptive technologies: catching the wave. Harvard Bus Rev 73(1):43–53
Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A (2014) The second machine age: progress and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. Norton, New York
Cirillo V, Pianta M, Nascia L (2015) The dynamics of skills: technology and business cycles, scuola superiore sant’Anna Lem working paper, no. 2015/30
Dardot P, Laval Ch (2009) La nouvelle raison du monde. Essai sur la société néolibérale, La Découvert, Paris
de Terssac G (1992) Autonomie dans le travail. PUF, Paris
Engelen E, Johal S, Salento A, Williams K (2014) How to build a fairer city, The Guardian/Cities. http://www.theguardian.com/cities/2014/sep/24/manifesto-fairer-grounded-city-sustainable-transport-broadband-housing. Accessed 24 Sept 2014
European Commission (2012) A stronger European industry for growth and economic recovery, communication to the European parliament, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/com/com_com(2012)0582_/com_com(2012)0582_en.pdf
Fligstein N (2001) The architecture of markets: an economic sociologo of twenty-first-century capitalist societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Florida R (2002) The rise of the creative class. And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. Perseus Book Group, New York
Frank RH, Cook P (1995) The winner-take-all society. Why the few at the top get so much more than the rest of us. Free Press, New York
Frey CB, Osborne MA (2013) The future of employment. How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Oxford University programme on the impacts of future technology, Oxford
Gallino L (1998) Se tre milioni vi sembran pochi. Sui modi per combattere la disoccupazione, Einaudi, Torino
Glaeser EL (2011) Triumph of the city: how our greatest invention makes us richer, smarter, greener, healthier, and happier. Penguin, London
Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am J Sociol 78(6):481–510
Harrison B (1994) Lean and mean: the changing landscape of corporate power in the age of flexibility. Basic Books, New York
Head S (2014) Mindless: why smarter machines are making dumber humans. Basic Books, New York
Krippner G (2011) Capitalizing on crisis: the political origins of the rise of finance. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Maggi B (2003) De l’agir organisationnel: un point de vue sur le travail, le bien-être, l’apprentissage. Toulouse, Octarès
Magone A, Mazali T (2016) Industria 4.0. Uomini e macchine nella fabbrica digitale, Guerini e Associati, Milano
Masino G, Zamarian M (2000) La mediazione degli artefatti nella regolazione organizzativa. In: Maggi B (ed) Le sfide organizzative di fine e inizio secolo. Tra post-fordismo e deregolazione, Etas, Torino, pp 151–164
Mayo E (1933) The human problems of an industrialized civilization. Macmillan, London
Moretti E (2012) The new geography of jobs. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston
Noble D (1979) Social choice in machine design. In: Zimbalist A (ed) Case studies on the labor process. Monthly Review Press, New York, pp 100–134
Norman DA (1993) Things that make us smart. Addison-Wesley, Reading
Page SE (2006) Path dependence. Q J Political Sci 1:87–115
Piketty Th (2013) Le capital au XXI siècle. Seuil, Paris
Polanyi M (1967) The tacit dimension. Doubleday Anchor, New York
Ramella F (2015) Sociology of economic innovation. Routledge, London
Sachs JD and Kotlikoff LJ (2012) Smart machines and long-term misery”, NBER working paper no. w18629. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2192802)
Salento A, Masino G (2013) La fabbrica della crisi. Finanziarizzazione delle imprese e declino del lavoro, Carocci, Roma
Staglianò R (2016) Al posto tuo. Così web e robot ci stanno rubando il lavoro, Einaudi, Torino
Standing G (2011) The precariat: the new dangerous class. Bloomsbury, London
Thompson JD (1967) Organizations in action. McGraw-Hill, New York
World Economic Forum (2016) The future of jobs. Employment, skills and workforce strategy for the fourth industrial revolution. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Salento, A. Digitalisation and the regulation of work: theoretical issues and normative challenges. AI & Soc 33, 369–378 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0738-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0738-z