Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Challenging Food Governance Models: Analyzing the Food Citizen and the Emerging Food Constitutionalism from an EU Perspective

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Critical analyses of current food systems underline the need to respond to important challenges in questions of nutritional health, environmental sustainability, socio-economic development and protection of the cultural wealth. A wide range of perspectives and methodologies were used to carry out those analyses yielding a significant variety of proposals to undertake the challenges. In most of those analyses, the need to transform our current food systems both from the local to the global level is emphasized, paying attention to food chain processes as well as to decision-makers. The analysis presented in this paper reflects specifically on those proposals based on a common aspect: the need to transform the governance of the EU present-day food system, that is, who makes decisions, how are those decisions made, and which changes need to be made to empower food consumers. The introduction of reforms to change these models is proposed. The focus of these proposals, including those that argue in favour of food sovereignty, the human right to food or the acknowledgement of a food citizenship, share, I believe, a common key. All of them advocate transformations in models of food governance on the basis of a series of mechanisms and principles which for centuries have been employed to control power and grant the governed a status digno vis-à-vis those who govern. Within those proposals we may identify an incipient food constitutionalism, which I will address along with the opportunities and obstacles inherent in the current EU Legal Framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, B. (2007). The living constitution. New Haven: Yale Law School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akram-Lodhi, H. (2013). How to build food sovereignty. In Conference paper for discussion at Food sovereignty: A critical dialogue, Yale University.

  • Alkon, A. (2012). Black white and green: Farmers, markets, race and green economy. University of Georgia Press.

  • Alkon, A. H. (2013). Food justice, food sovereignty and the challenge of neoliberalism. The Journal of Peasant Studies, Yale.

  • Balaguer Callejón, F. (2005). Die europäische Verfassung auf dem Weg zum Europäischen Verfassungsrecht. Jahrbuch des öffentlichen Rechts der Gegenwart, 55, 337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brem-Wilson, J. (2010). The reformed Committee on World Food Security. A briefing paper for civil society. IPC & Mundubat. http://www.foodsovereignty.org/Portals/0/documenti%20sito/Home/News/reformed%20CFS_english.pdf.

  • Bunte, F., & Dagevos, J. C. (2009). The food economy: Global issues and challenges. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Camilleri, J. A. (2002). Major structural reform. In E. Aksu & J. A. Camilleri (Eds.), Democratizing global governance (pp. 255–271). Palgrave MacMillan: Houndmills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clotet Banus, R., et al. (2010). Human development and food: A global vision. In C. M. Romeo & L. Escajedo (Eds.), Global food security: Ethical and legal challenges. Wageningen Academics Publishers: Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Contreras, J., & García, M. (2005). Alimentación y Cultura, perspectivas antropológicas. Ariel, Madrid.

  • De Tavernier, J. (2012). Food citizenship: Is there a duty for responsible consumption? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 25, 895–907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Declaration at the Parallel Rome forum. (1997). Profit for some or food for all: Food sovereignty and the elimination of the globalization of hunger.

  • Escajedo San-Epifanio, L. (2009). Consequences of the EC framework of health claims made on food: Are we protecting the consumer by means of human trials? In K. Millar, et al. (Eds.), Ethical futures: bioscience and food horizons. Wageningen Academics Publishers: Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrajoli, L. (2010). Más allá de la soberanía y la ciudadanía: Un constitucionalismo global. In: Carbonell, M., & Vázquez, R.(comps.), Estado constitucional y globalización. México: Porrúa.

  • Ferrarese, M. R. (2001). Las instituciones jurídicas de la globalización. Revista Jueces para la Democracia, 21, 22–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. (2005). The state of food insecurity in the world 2005. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2005). Voluntary guidelines to support the progressive realization of the right to adequate food in the context of national food security. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forum Sovranità Alimentare. (2007). Declaration of the forum for food sovereignty. Nyéléni Village: Sélingué. http://www.nyeleni.org/spip.php?article290.

  • García Canclini, N. (1995). Consumidores y Ciudadanos. Grijalbo, Mexico: Conflictos multiculturales de la globalización.

    Google Scholar 

  • González Vaqué, L. (2004). El principio de precaución en la jurisprudencia del tribunal de justicia de las comunidades europeas: ¿un principio de buen gobierno? Estudios sobre consumo, 68, 17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • González Vaqué, L. (2005). El principio de precaución: Incertidumbre científica, riesgos hipotéticos y decisión política. Revista Aranzadi de Derecho Ambiental, 7, 97–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthman, J. (2008). Bringing good food to others: Investigating the subjects of alternative food practice. Cultural Geographies, 15(4), 431–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Häberle, P. (2004). Normatividad y reformabilidad de la Constitución desde las Ciencias de la Cultura. In: Nueve Ensayos Constitucionales y una Lección Jubilar. Peru: Ed. Palestra.

  • Halkier, B. (1999). Consequences of the politicization of consumption: The example of environmentally friendly consumption practices. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 1, 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt-Gimenez, E. (2011). Food security, food justice or food sovereignity? Crises, food movements and regime change. In A. Alkon & J. Agyeman (Eds.), Cultivating food justice; race, class and sustainability. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, T., & Heasman, M. (2004). Food wars: The global battle for mouths. Earthscan, London: Minds and Markets.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G. (1992). Structural policy in the European Community. In Sbragia (Ed.), Europolitics, institutions and policymaking in the New European Community, pp. 191–225.

  • Matteucci, N. (1963). Positivismo giuridico e costituzionalismo. Rivista trimestrale di diritto e procedura civile, pp. 1041–1052.

  • McKeon, N. (2011). global governance for world food security: A scorecard four years after the eruption of the ‘food crisis’. Berlin: Heinrich Boll Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMichael, P. (2001). Revisiting the question of the transnational state? Theory and Society, 30, 201–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMichael, P. (2013). Historicizing food sovereignity: A food regime perspective, en international conference food sovereignity: a critical dialogue. New Haven: Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micheletti, M. (2003). Political virtue and shopping. Individuals, consumerism, and collective action. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oosterveer, P. (2007). Global governance of food production and consumption. Wageningen: Wageningen University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, E. A., & Redcliff, A. (2002). Human security and the environment international comparisons. Cheltenham: Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pattel, R. (2007). Transgressing rights: La Via Campesina’s call for food sovereignity. Feminist Economics, 13(1), 87–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattel, R. (2012). Stuffed and Starved: The hidden battle for the world food system, 2nd edn.

  • Pernice, I. (1999). Multilevel constitutionalism and the treaty of Amsterdam: European constitution-making revisited? Common Market Law Review, 36, 703.

  • Piattoni, S. (2010). The theory of multilevel governance. conceptual, empirical, and normative challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimbert, M. (2009). Towards food sovereignty. London: Gatekeeper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, W. I. (2001). Social theory and globalization: The rise of a transnational state. Theory and Society, 30, 157–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez Fuentes, V. Derecho Agroalimentario, Bosch, (2003).

  • Rowe, G., Marsh, R., & Frewer, L. (2004). Evaluation of a deliberative conference. Science, Technology and Human Values, 29(1), 88–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzgalis, W. (2014). John Locke. In Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2014 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/locke/.

  • Valente, F. L. S. (2010). It is time for a rights-based global strategic framework on food security and nutrition, in right to food and nutrition watch. FIAN: Challenges for global Governance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warde, A. (1997). Consumption, food and taste (pp. 132–135). Manchester University: SAGE Publications.

  • Windfuhr, M. (1998). NGOs and the right to adequate food. In The right to food in theory and practice, FAO.

  • Windfuhr, M., & Jonsen, J. (2005). Food sovereignty: Towards democracy in localized food systems. FIAN, ITDG Publishing.

  • Ziegler, J. (2001). The right to food E/CN. 4/2001/53.

  • Zwart, H. (2000). A short history of food ethics. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 12(2), 113–126.

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to acknowledge here the input of the different experts that took part in the review process. Their comments and suggestions have been very helpful. “Food, Beliefs and Cultural Diversity Project”, funded by the Government of Castilla-Leon; Research Team Grant IT 743-13 of the Directorate on Scientific Policy of the Basque Country “Multilevel Constitutionalism and Integration of Diversity (Political, Legal-Institutional and Cultural-Religious)”; “The Ways of Federalism and the Horizons of the Spanish Territorial Autonomy: Accommodation of political and cultural diversity”, DER2013-47774-P (MINECO); URBAN-ELIKA, Cross-Disciplinary Studies for Food and Society, “Improving access to food”, US14/19 (University of the Basque Country).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Escajedo San-Epifanio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Escajedo San-Epifanio, L. Challenging Food Governance Models: Analyzing the Food Citizen and the Emerging Food Constitutionalism from an EU Perspective. J Agric Environ Ethics 28, 435–454 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-015-9543-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-015-9543-1

Keywords

Navigation